Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Draft Companies (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 23 December 2010 regarding: Draft Companies (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

Decision Reference:  MD-E-2010-0210 

 

Decision Summary Title :

Draft Companies (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

 

Date of Decision Summary:

23 December 2010

Decision Summary Author:

 

Director, Finance Industry Development

 

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

 

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

Draft Companies (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

 

Date of Written Report:

23 December 2010

Written Report Author:

Director, Finance Industry Development

 

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject:  

 

Draft Companies (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Regulations 201- (“the draft Regulations”)

 

Decision(s):

 

The Minister approved the draft Regulations and directed that these be lodged au Greffe for debate by the States at the earliest opportunity.

 

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

 

The draft Regulations will amend the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 to provide for certain companies incorporated in Jersey to merge, in any combination, with other such companies, other bodies incorporated in Jersey, or bodies incorporated outside Jersey (subject to certain restrictions).  

 

 

Resource Implications:

 

There are no financial or manpower implications for the States.

 

Action required:

 

The draft Regulations to be lodged au Greffe for debate by the States at the earliest opportunity.

 

Signature:  Senator A.J.H.Maclean

 

 

Position: Minister for Economic Development

 

 

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Draft Companies (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

Lodging of draft Companies (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

 

 

1. Issue and Recommendation

 

1.1.            The draft Companies (Amendment No. 5) (Jersey) Regulations 201-     (“the draft Regulations”) will amend the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 to provide for certain companies incorporated in Jersey to merge, in any combination, with other such companies, other bodies incorporated in Jersey, or bodies incorporated outside Jersey (subject to certain restrictions).

 

1.2. It is recommended that the Minister approves the draft Regulations and that these be lodged au Greffe for debate by the States at the earliest opportunity.

 

1.3. The Law Officers’ Department has indicated that the draft Regulations are Human Rights compliant and that all tariffs for new offences created are commensurate with similar existing offences. 

 

1.4. There are no manpower or cost implications for the States.

 

 

2. Background

 

2.1.            At present, it is only possible to directly merge a Jersey company with another Jersey company.  However, the Companies (Amendment No.10) (Jersey) Law 2009 introduced an enabling provision into the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 (“the Companies Law”) allowing the States to make Regulations to permit the cross-border merger of Jersey companies with companies and other bodies incorporated outside Jersey and also with bodies that are incorporated in Jersey but which are not companies.

 

2.2.            In an increasingly globalised world, more and more business is conducted across national borders and there is a growing demand for Jersey companies to be able to merge directly with a wider range of bodies, in particular with foreign companies – something which is already permitted by some of our competitor jurisdictions.

 

2.3.            Although it is possible to merge a Jersey company with a foreign company indirectly by first bringing them into the same jurisdiction (either by continuing the Jersey company into the foreign jurisdiction or by continuing the foreign company into Jersey under Part 18C of the Companies Law) and then merging them (either under Part 18B of the Companies Law or the relevant foreign law), this procedure is more cumbersome than the direct merger process permitted in other jurisdictions and is also more costly. 

 

2.4.            In order to ensure that Jersey’s company law remains market leading, it is intended to amend Part 18B of the Companies Law so as to permit the cross-border merger of Jersey companies (subject to appropriate safeguards) with any other body corporate, wherever incorporated.  This will include foreign companies, foreign incorporated bodies and also bodies that are incorporated in Jersey but are not companies, such as foundations (once corresponding amendments have been made to the foundations legislation).   

 

2.5.            It is considered that the proposed amendments are necessary in order to strengthen the competitiveness of the Jersey company, one of the key tools used by the finance industry in the Island, which will help to maintain Jersey’s position as one of the most progressive jurisdictions in the world.

 

Draft Companies (Amendment No.5) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

 

2.6.            The draft Regulations provide for certain companies incorporated in Jersey to merge, in any combination, with other such companies, other bodies incorporated in Jersey, or bodies incorporated outside Jersey (subject to certain restrictions).

 

2.7.            The result of a merger is either that one of the merging bodies (a survivor body) absorbs the others or that they are all merged into a new body which is created by the merger and shares certain characteristics with at least one of the merging bodies.

 

2.8.            All merging bodies that are companies must obtain approval from their members and give notice to their creditors, and both members and creditors may object to the court if their interests would be unfairly prejudiced.

 

2.9.            A merger involving only Jersey companies can be carried out through the registrar of companies. Any other merger requires the consent of the Jersey Financial Services Commission (“the Commission”), which must consider the interests of members, creditors and the public, and the reputation of Jersey.

 

2.10.       The draft Regulations will permit a merger to take place where, although the merged body will be solvent, one or more of the merging companies will not meet the test for a solvency statement before the merger (in a merger involving an insolvent merging body other than a company, the merged body would still have to be solvent and the Commission, before deciding whether to give consent, would consider the interests of creditors of all of the merging bodies.

 

2.11.       The merger can only take place if the company without the solvency statement applies to the court, and the court decides to permit the merger on the basis that it will not be prejudicial to any creditor of any of the merging bodies. The company must send a copy of the application to any creditors of any of the merging bodies who are known after reasonable enquiry to be owed over £5,000, and to any other creditors on request.

 

3. Recommendation

 

3.1. It is recommended that the Minister approves the draft Regulations and that these be lodged au Greffe for debate by the States at the earliest opportunity.

 

 

 

DIRECTOR, FINANCE INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT  

1

 

Back to top
rating button