Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

P/2022/0882 - Fields MN561B and MN683 (FOI)

P/2022/0882 - Fields MN561B and MN683 (FOI)

Produced by the Freedom of Information office
Authored by Government of Jersey and published on 12 September 2024.
Prepared internally, no external costs.


Request

P/2022/0882 - Fields MN561B and MN683 La Rue de la Clochette, St Martin

How many times since Planning Refusal of the 8 December 2022 has the Planning Enforcement Department met or corresponded with the Planning Applicant and if so, please advise of the dates of the correspondence, calls or meetings?

Response

Information has been withheld in accordance with Article 42 (Law Enforcement) of the Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law 2011 as it relates to a live Compliance Case.

Article applied

Article 42 - Law enforcement

Information is qualified exempt information if its disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice –

​(a) the prevention, detection or investigation of crime, whether in Jersey or elsewhere;

(b) the apprehension or prosecution of offenders, whether in respect of offences committed in Jersey or elsewhere;

(c) the administration of justice, whether in Jersey or elsewhere;

(d) the assessment or collection of a tax or duty or of an imposition of a similar nature;

(e) the operation of immigration controls, whether in Jersey or elsewhere;

(f) the maintenance of security and good order in prisons or in other institutions where persons are lawfully detained;

(g) the proper supervision or regulation of financial services; or

(h) the exercise, by the Jersey Financial Services Commission, of any function imposed on it by any enactment.

Public Interest Test

Whilst disclosure of the information would support transparency, promote accountability to the general public and provide confirmation that necessary actions are taking place, the investigations in this matter remain ongoing.

As such it is considered that disclosure of these records would likely prejudice the outcome and the result of the case and that this potential prejudice outweighs the public interest in favour of disclosure at this time.​

Back to top
rating button