Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Education, Sport and Culture 2008 Budget Transfers.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (23/01/2009) regarding: Education, Sport and Culture 2008 Budget Transfers.

Decision Reference:  MD-TR-2009-0010

Decision Summary Title:

ESC 2008 Budget Transfers

Date of Decision Summary:

23rdJanuary 2009

Decision Summary Author:

Amy Taylor – Head of Financial Reporting

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title:

ESC 2008 Budget Transfers

Date of Written Report:

23rd January 2008

Written Report Author:

Amy Taylor – Head of Financial Reporting

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: 

Education, Sport and Culture 2008 budget transfers.

Decision(s): 

The Minister approved the following transfers:

  • £310,000 from ESC’s revenue budget to their capital budget for the ICT Strategy phase II;
  • £25,427 actual from the Treasury and Resources department to ESC; and
  • £311,573 from the WEB Leisure Pool capital vote to ESC’s revenue budget in respect of the operating deficit of the waterfront pool in 2008.

Reason(s) for Decision:

Financial Direction 3.6 requires certain budget transfers to be approved by the Minister for Treasury and Resources.

Resource Implications:

As per the attached report.

Action required: 

Treasury to advise the Education, Sport and Culture Department of decision and to arrange for the budget transfers to be actioned.

Signature: 

Position: Senator PFC Ozouf, Minister for Treasury and Resources 
 

Date Signed: 23rd January 2009

Date of Decision: 23rd January 2009

Education, Sport and Culture 2008 Budget Transfers.

TREASURY AND RESOURCES MINISTER

Education, Sport and Culture 2008 Budget Transfers  

  1. Purpose of Report
    1. The Minister is asked to agree the 2008 year end budget transfers for the Education, Sport and Culture Department (ESC) in respect of ICT funding and the waterfront pool deficit.
  2. Background
  3. ICT Funding

The Minister will note that the issue of how to fund the ICT replacement programme and phase II of the ICT strategy has been on the agenda since the first phase of the strategy commenced in 1999.  Funding for one year of £600,000 was identified within the States central IT vote for 2008, which has as yet not been called on by the department. No funds have been allocated for 2009 and 2010, but long term funding is to be considered within the current Strategic Plan process. 

In line with practice for the past 3 years, it is proposed that savings made within the department’s revenue budget are transferred to the ICT capital budget for use against ongoing ICT replacement and enhancement. The department has recently taken receipt of PCs, which were ordered in 2008 but only received in 2009, to the value of £130,000 which requires this funding. 

A summary of the financial position of the ICT capital budget is shown below : 

 

Budget

£

Expenditure

£

Brought forward 1 Jan 2008

2,854,697

1,892,758

Revenue transfer

310,000

 

Expenditure 2008

 

83,379

Out-turn position 2008

3,164,697

1,976,137

 

 

 

Figures in italics indicate transfers proposed in this report. 

In addition to the above, a further £256,000 has been spent on revenue items such as support for schools ICT co-ordinators, software licences, systems support and training.  These costs will be reflected within the revenue budget. 
 

2.2 Waterfront Pool

The latest figures from a report dated 9th January 2009, prepared by James Shepherd, Operations Director, Serco (Jersey) Ltd indicate a net overspend of approximately £342,668 in respect of the operation of the Waterfront Pool for the year 2008.  As a result of some confusion during the course of the year in regard to the amount of subsidy payable monthly by CTP Ltd (the original developers of the Waterfront site) there is still a small credit balance remaining on the Business Unit dealing with the Waterfront Pool, and the sum of £337,000 is required to fund the deficit payment. 

The Waterfront Pool was transferred to the administration of the Department for Education, Sport and Culture (ESC) from the Waterfront Enterprise Board in the early part of 2005.  At that time a commitment was made by the then Finance and Economics Committee that deficits (which are contractually bound to be paid to Serco (Jersey) Limited) would be funded centrally and that there would be no adverse affects on the ESC budget. 

The loss for 2006 was £275,456, which was paid to Serco in the early part of 2007 and a budget of £275,000 was transferred from T&R to cover this payment.  A creditor was raised at the end of 2006 to correctly account for the deficit in that year. 

The loss for 2007 was £297,873, which was paid to Serco in the early part of 2008 and a budget of £298,000 was transferred from T&R to cover this payment.  A creditor was raised at the end of 2007 to correctly account for the deficit in that year. 

Funding for 2009 has been agreed as an addition to the budget of the ESC department, however, for 2008 the budget remains within the capital allocation held by the Treasury and Resources department. 

A refund of £25,427 was received from WEB for contingency expenses in 2006 in respect of the Waterfront Pool which is currently held by the Treasury and Resources department. It is therefore proposed that the refund is transferred to ESC and that the remaining required budget allocation of £311,573 is also transferred to ESC. 
 

  1. Recommendation

It is recommended that the Minister approve the following transfers:

  • £310,000 from ESC’s revenue budget to their capital budget for the ICT Strategy phase II;
  • £25,427 actual from the Treasury and Resources department to ESC; and
  • £311,573 from the WEB Leisure Pool capital vote to ESC’s revenue budget in respect of the operating deficit of the waterfront pool in 2008.

 

Back to top
rating button