Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Le Foin Bas, Route Orange, St. Brelade

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (02.02.08) to endorse the request for archaeological investigations to support planning applications for Le Foin Bas, Route Orange, St. Brelade.

Decision Ref:

MD–PE–2008-00027

Subject:

Archaeological investigations to support planning applications: P/2007/2386 – Le Foin Bas, Route Orange, St. Brelade

Decision Summary Title:

DS – Archaeological investigations to support planning applications: P/2007/2386 – Le Foin Bas, Route Orange, St. Brelade

DS Author:

J Dore Principal Historic Buildings Advisor

DS Date:

1/02/08

DS Status:

Public

Written Report Title:

WR – Archaeological investigations to support planning applications: P/2007/2386 – Le Foin Bas, Route Orange, St. Brelade

WR Author:

J Dore Principal Historic Buildings Advisor

WR Date

29/01/08

WR Status:

Public

Oral Rapporteur:

J Dore Principal Historic Buildings Advisor

Decision(s):

The Minister for Planning and Environment endorsed and upheld the request for pre-determination archaeological investigations and reports in accordance with the brief (revised) provided by Oxford Archaeology relative to the proposed development at Le Foin Bas, Route Orange, St Brelade (P/2007/2386).

Reason(s) for Decision:

The need to provide full information for the determination of a planning application is in accordance with adopted policy and SPG.

Legal and Resource Implications:

SPG has been adopted in relation to archaeological sites and along with Island Plan Policy guide the way in which Planning applications are managed and the level of information which is requested to enable a properly informed recommendation to be formulated. If insufficient information is submitted and the application is permitted there is a risk that archaeology may be lost or damaged, or if there are finds of high significance the contract may be delayed or worse with the potential for costs claims against the department. Thus the request for full information prior to determination allows for a fully informed assessment of the application and provides much greater certainty for all concerned.

The process as recommended is within existing resources. If archaeological remains were to be found during the contract where permission had been given without full information, it is possible that additional costs may be incurred in relation to dealing with finds and potential costs relating to delay of the construction works.

Action required:

  1. Advise the applicant and agent of the decision and forward the revised brief for the pre-determination investigations.
  2. Advise Development Control as above

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister for Planning and Environment

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different to Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button