Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Review of Bicycle Laws (P27/2010): Ministerial Response

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 8 April 2010 to approve the Ministerial Comment on Review of Bicycle Laws (P27/2010)

Decision Reference: MD-T-2010-0036

Decision Summary Title :

Proposition 27/2010 – Review of Bicycle Laws - Comments

Date of Decision Summary:

1 April 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Head of DVS &

Inspector of Motor Traffic

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Proposition 27/2010 – Review of Bicycle Laws - Comments

Date of Written Report:

1 April 2010

Written Report Author:

Head of DVS &

Inspector of Motor Traffic

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:   Proposition 27/2010 – Review of Bicycle Laws - Comments

Decision(s): The Minister for Transport and Technical Services approved the attached Ministerial Comment on P27-2010 – Review of Bicycle Laws

Reason(s) for Decision:  To provide evidence to the States that the current bicycle legislation is fit for purpose and that any proposal to reintroduce bicycle registration is detrimental to States policies.

Resource Implications:  None

Action required:  That the Chief Officer of Transport and Technical Services request the Greffier to arrange for the Comment to be presented to the States in time for the States debate scheduled for 20 April 2010

Signature: 

Position: 

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Review of Bicycle Laws (P27/2010): Ministerial Response

TRANSPORT AND TECHNICAL SERVICES  

P27/2010 - REVIEW OF BICYCLE LAWS  

MINISTER’S COMMENTS  
 

Purpose of the Report  

To provide the Minister for Transport and Technical Services comments on Proposition 27/2010 - Review of Bicycle Laws. 
 

Background  

The Deputy of St John has lodged a Proposition 27/2010 – Review of Bicycle Laws.  In order to respond to the Proposition and provide the States with evidence on matters raised in the Report and Proposition, in advance of debating the Proposition, the Minister has asked that a report providing comments is prepared for lodging. 
 

Discussion  

The Comments provide a fuller background to the Proposition and the accompanying Report, putting the Proposition into context, particularly with respect to the priorities in the Strategic Plan and States policies.  The Proposition is at odds with the aims of encouraging a healthier, fitter population and sustainable travel. 
 

Recommendation  

The Minister for Transport and Technical Services is requested to approve the attached Ministerial comments. 
 

Reason(s) for Decision  

To provide evidence to the States that the current bicycle legislation is fit for purpose and that any proposal to reintroduce bicycle registration is detrimental to States policies. 
 

Action Required  

That the Chief Officer of Transport and Technical Services request the Greffier to arrange for the comments to be presented to the States in time for the States Debate scheduled for 20 April 2010 
 
 

Written by:

Head of Driver and Vehicle Standards

Approved by: 

Acting Director of Transport and Traffic Policy.

Attachment:

Proposition 27/2010 - Review Of Bicycle Laws - Comments

 

 

Back to top
rating button