Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Comment to P.147/2008 - Rates: the States' liability.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (15/01/2009) regarding: Comment to P.147/2008 - Rates: the States' liability.

Decision Reference:  MD-TR-2009-0004

Decision Summary Title:

Comment P147/2008 - Rates: the States’ liability

Date of Decision Summary:

08/1/09

Decision Summary Author:

R.Foster

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title:

Draft Comment to P147/2008 - Rates: the States’ liability

Date of Written Report:

8/1/09

Written Report Author:

R.Foster

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: 

Comment to P147/2008 - Rates: the States’ liability 

Decision(s): 

The Minister approved the comment on project P147/2008 - Rates: the States’ liability as set out in the attached report.

Reason(s) for Decision:

The subject matter of the project impacts on the Treasury and Resources department

Resource Implications:

None resulting from the comment

Action required:

Comment to be presented to the States

Signature: 
 
 

Position: Senator P.F.C. Ozouf Minister for Treasury and Resources 

                 

Date Signed: 15/01/2009

Date of Decision: 15/01/2009

Comment to P.147/2008 - Rates: the States' liability.

Comment to P147/2008 - Rates: the States’ liability  

Whilst the Minister broadly supports the Working Party’s argument that the States should pay rates on its properties from an equity standpoint, such are the significant pressures on public finances it is not feasible to absorb the additional cost within already pressured States spending limits.  

The cost of implementing the proposal will be in the order of £1.65 million per annum at a time when the States has numerous unfunded challenges, such as the cost of maintaining the reciprocal health agreement with the United Kingdom, and significant property and infrastructure works backlogs, which must take priority.  

Pressures on States funding are likely to increase during the current period of economic uncertainty and no funding has been included in States’ spending proposals to meet the additional costs associated with the proposition.  

To preserve the States budget position there would need to be a compensatory measure. The Minister met with the Connétable and agreed a process to resolve the matter. Property Holdings would commence work to evaluate those States properties from which a commercial activity is undertaken, resulting in the delivery of a chargeable service that recovers its costs, with a view to moving to the payment of full rates over time for these properties. Consideration will also be given to charging the residual States liability to the Island Wide Rate commercial element.  

The Minister believed that an agreement had been reached to move forward on this basis to find a constructive compromise position for the Parish accounting year commencing May 2010, at the earliest.  
 

 

Back to top
rating button