Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Income Tax: Report on Personal Income Tax Assessments (P.106/2012): Comments of the Minister for Treasury and Resources

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 28 November 2012:

Decision Reference:  MD-TR-2012-0105

Decision Summary Title:

Comments on P106/2012: Income Tax: Report on Personal Income Tax Assessments

Date of Decision Summary:

27 November 2012

Decision Summary Author:

 

Director – Tax Policy

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Comments on P106/2012: Income Tax: Report on Personal Income Tax Assessments

Date of Written Report:

27 November 2012

Written Report Author:

Director – Tax Policy

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject:  Comments on P106/2012: Income Tax: Report on Personal Income Tax Assessments.

Decision(s):  The Minister approved his comment on P.106/2012: Income Tax: Report on Personal Income Tax Assessments.

Reason(s) for Decision:  To enable the Minister’s comments on P106/2012: Income Tax: Report on Personal Income Tax Assessments to be presented to the States.

Resource Implications:  Other than those detailed in the comments there are no further financial or manpower implications.

Action required:  Greffier of the States to be requested to present attached comments to the States at the earliest opportunity and prior to debate of P106/2012 at the sitting commencing 4 December 2012.

Signature:

 

 

 

Position: Senator P F C Ozouf

Minister for Treasury and Resources

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision:

 

Income Tax: Report on Personal Income Tax Assessments (P.106/2012): Comments of the Minister for Treasury and Resources

Comment to ‘Income Tax: Report on Personal Income Tax Assessments’ (p. 106/2012)

 

The Minister for Treasury & Resources has already, on more than one occasion, publicly committed to undertake a feasibility study into the possibility of introducing independent taxation, within a clearly defined timescale.

 

The Minister recognises the importance of modernisation of the tax laws which is why he committed, in the 2012 Budget Statement (September 2011), to complete this within a 2 – 3 year time period.

 

The 2013 Budget Statement refers to the significant progress made in tax policy and tax administration over the past year.  Further work is underway including the second phase of the transformation programme.  This involves implementing a range of major initiatives and recommendations and is likely to span a 2 to 3 year period. The work will be aimed at modernising and simplifying the tax system, the interrelationships between relevant States departments, improving the range and types of services available to all taxpayers and delivering CSR savings.

 

These initiatives are:

 

  • Online filing for personal taxpayers initially for those with agents (2013) but with the goal of rolling this out to all personal taxpayers (2014).
  • Self assessment for companies (2014)
  • Self assessment for personal taxpayers (2015)
  • Introduction of a statutory interest regime (2015)
  • Introduction of a risk based approach to all tax types (started and on going)
  • Data sharing across relevant States departments (review started)

Earlier in 2012 it was also agreed that the Taxes Office would administer the new Long Term Care charge acting as agents on behalf of Social Security Department. This is a major States project with an implementation date of January 2014.

 

Financial and Manpower

 

The proposition assumes there will be no financial or manpower costs arising from the proposition on the basis that the feasibility report can be prepared by existing staff.

 

Introducing independent taxation would not just involve making amendments to the Income Tax legislation; the impact would be much wider than this. As such, the Minister would be looking to engage an external Economics Consultancy to contribute to the report.

 

There would in fact be financial implications arising from the external economics advice that would be required. This cost cannot be specified until the project has commenced and the detailed scope of the work is determined.

 

In view of the fact the Minister has already, publicly, committed to a review regarding the potential introduction of independent taxation, within a specified timescale which is in line with the Deputy’s proposition, the Minister politely requests that the Deputy withdraw this proposition.

 

Back to top
rating button