Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Inert waste strategy feasibility assessment - funding

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 8 March 2010 regarding: Inert waste strategy feasibility assessment - funding.

ecision Reference:  MD-TR-2010-0035

Decision Summary Title:

Temporary Capital Transfer From Central Planning Vote to Transport and Technical Services

Date of Decision Summary:

25/02/2010

Decision Summary Author:

Head of Decision Support

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Transport and Technical Services Temporary Capital Transfer from Central Planning Vote

Date of Written Report:

25/02/2010

Written Report Author:

Finance Manager, Decision Support

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:

Temporary Budget Transfer from Central Planning Vote to fund Inert Waste Strategy feasibility assessment.

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the £300,000 capital budget transfer from the Central Panning Vote in 2010 to Transport and Technical Services Department to fund the Inert Waste Strategy assessment.  The Department will replenish the Central Planning Vote from its Business Plan allocation of £750,000 for the project in 2011.

Reason(s) for Decision: The temporary budget transfer will enable the Inert Waste Strategy feasibility assessment to commence in 2010 to ensure a new site is operational before 2015.

Resource Implications: Other than those detailed in the report there are no further financial or manpower Implications

Action required:

Head of Financial Planning to action budget transfers.  Director, Municipal Services to progress the feasibility study.

Signature: 
 
 

Position: Senator P.C.F Ozouf, Minister for Treasury and Resources 

Date Signed:

Date of Decision:

Inert waste strategy feasibility assessment - funding

Treasury and Resources

Ministerial Report  
 
 

transport and technical services department

temporary capital transfer from central planning vote

 

1.      Purpose of Report

To enable the Minister to approve a temporary capital budget transfer of £300,000 from the Central Planning Vote to Transport and Technical Services to enable early commencement of the Inert Waste Strategy assessment. 

2.      Background

The Inert Waste Strategy is scheduled to receive £750,000 in 2011, as approved in the States Annual Business Plan 2010, to undertake a feasibility assessment to determine the most appropriate location for a new facility to safely dispose of the Island’s inert waste.  The new site must be operational by 2015 as the current location is likely to be full by then. 

3.      Current Position

Annual disposal volumes of inert waste vary and a number of big basement dig outs have occurred since the initial bid leading the Transport and Technical Services Department to believe the operating life of the current location will be reduced further.  Therefore the Department wish to commence the assessment early in 2010 to ensure completion before the current location is full.

To fund the early commencement of the assessment the Department’s Ministerial Decision requested permission to transfer £300,000 from the Sludge Thickening vote in 2010, and then replenish it in 2011 when the £750,000 for the Inert Waste Strategy becomes available.  However, the Central Planning Vote has been used in the past to provide departments with advance monies to fund feasibility studies.  The advance is then replenished back to the Central Planning Vote when the department receives the funding through the Business Plan process. 

4.      Recommendation

That the Minister approves the £300,000 capital budget transfer from the Central Panning Vote in 2010 to the Transport and Technical Services Department to fund the Inert Waste Strategy assessment.  The Department will replenish the Central Planning Vote from its Business Plan allocation of £750,000 for the project in 2011. 

5.      Reason for Decision

Under Financial Direction 3.6 and the Public Finance (Jersey) Law 2005, the approval of the Minister for Treasury and Resources is required for any variations to heads of expenditure above £100,000. 

6.      Resource Implications

There are no manpower implications or increases in budgets or expenditure. 
 

 

Back to top
rating button