Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Law drafting instructions in relation to appointments under the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 24 March 2010 regarding: Law drafting instructions in relation to appointments under the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998 (“the Law”).

Decision Reference:   MD-E-2010-0053 

Decision Summary Title:

Law drafting instructions in relation to appointments under the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998            

Date of Decision Summary:

22 March 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Director, Finance Industry Development

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Law drafting instructions in relation to appointments under the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998            

Date of Written Report:

22 March 2010

Written Report Author:

Director, Finance Industry Development

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: 

Law drafting instructions in relation to appointments under the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998 (“the Law”).

            

Decision(s) 

The Minister approved the recommended amendments to the Law and requested the Jersey Financial Services Commission (“the Commission”) to prepare the necessary law drafting instructions. 

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Commission has recommended that certain provisions of the Law relating to the appointment of Commissioners be amended in order to allow the Commission to more clearly demonstrate compliance with international standards for transparency and operational independence.

Resource Implications:  

There are no financial or manpower implications for the States of Jersey.

Action required: 

The Economic Development Department to notify the Commission and the Law Draftsman of this decision in order that drafting instructions can be prepared.

Signature:  Senator A.J.H.Maclean 
 

Position: Minister for Economic Development

Date Signed:                 

Date of Decision:   

 

Law drafting instructions in relation to appointments under the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998

The Minister for Economic Development (“the Minister”)  

Law drafting instructions in relation to appointments under the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998  
 

1. ISSUE AND RECOMMENDATION  

1.1.     The Jersey Financial Services Commission (“the Commission”) has recommended that certain provisions of the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998 (“the Law”) relating to the appointment of Commissioners be amended in order to allow the Commission to more clearly demonstrate compliance with international standards for transparency and operational independence.

 

1.2.     There are no financial or manpower implications for the States.

 

1.3.     It is recommended that the Minister approves the Commission’s recommended amendments to the Law and requests the Commission to prepare the necessary law drafting instructions. 

 

2. BACKGROUND 

2.1.     The IMF report in relation to banking business in Jersey recommended that the Law should be amended to provide an explicit requirement that the reasons for the dismissal from office of any commissioner be made public.

 

2.2.     When considering the IMF recommendation, it was noted that although it is the States that appoints Commissioners under the Law, the Minister may terminate the appointment of a Commissioner without the need for a States debate.  This contrasts with the position for appointments under the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2005, the Competition Regulatory Authority (Jersey) Law 2001 and the Gambling Commission (Jersey) Law 200-, under which the level of authority required for terminating an appointment is the same as that for making the appointment.

 

2.3.     The Commission has proposed that the Law should be amended to provide that if the Minister is satisfied that any of the relevant grounds for terminating a Commissioner’s appointment apply, the Minister would make a recommendation to the States for termination of the appointment.  The recommendation would be debated by the States in camera and if it is decided to terminate the appointment, both the decision and the reasons for it would be made public (unless the States decides that only the Commissioner should be informed of the reasons).

 

2.4.     Minor amendments are required in relation to the appointment and termination of the Deputy Chairman and to remove an obsolete reference relating to a former requirement that the Chairman must be a member of the Finance and Economics Committee.

 

3. RECOMMENDATION 

3.1.     It is recommended that the Minister approves the Commission’s recommended amendments to the Law and requests the Commission to prepare the necessary law drafting instructions. 

 
 

DIRECTOR, FINANCE INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT

P04-005  Page of 1

2010-02-25

 

Back to top
rating button