Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Future Hospital Site: Policy Development Board: Terms of Reference

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 13 July 2018

Ministerial decision reference:  MD-C-2018-0115 

Decision summary title:  Policy Development Board – Hospital Site

Decision summary author

Senior Officer, Chief Minister’s Office

Is the decision summary public or exempt? 

Public

Report title: Policy Development Board – Hospital Site

Report author or name of

person giving report

Senior Officer, Chief Minister’s Office

Is the report public or exempt?

Public

Decision and reason for the decision

The Chief Minister approved the terms of reference for a new Policy Development Board in relation to the hospital site, which will consider the available evidence in relation to the decision of the previous States Assembly to support the proposal of the Council of Ministers that the new hospital be located on the existing site, and to do this so with a view to providing assurance over this decision, or raising issues of concern in relation to the evidence that led to this decision.

Resource implications

There were no additional resource implications arising from this ministerial decision.

Action required

To establish the new Policy Development Board in relation to the hospital site as outlined in the terms of reference.

Signature

 

 

 

 

Position

 

Senator J. Le Fondré

Chief Minister

 

 

 

Date signed

 

Effective date of the decision

 

Future Hospital Site: Policy Development Board: Terms of Reference

 

 

 

 

 

TERMS OF REFERENCE

 

POLICY DEVELOPMENT BOARD

 

HOSPITAL SITE

 

Purpose:

 

To consider the available evidence in relation to the decision of the previous States Assembly to support the proposal of the Council of Ministers that the new hospital be located on the existing site, and to do this so with a view to providing assurance over this decision, or raising issues of concern in relation to the evidence that led to this decision.

 

The Board should do this with a view to:

 

  • Supporting patient care
  • Delivering overall value for money for the public purse

In doing this, the Board should:

 

  1.  Consider the extent to which the evidence supported the conclusion that alternative sites were less suitable or deliverable, including Peoples’ Park, St Saviour’s Hospital, Warwick Farm, Waterfront site (including Jardin de la Mer), Overdale, and a Dual Site solution.

 

  1.  Provide clear communications over their work and its outcomes, so as to provide the public with assurance.

 

  1.  Provide opportunity as part of their work for external parties to provide evidence.

Membership:

 

Connetable Taylor (Chair); Deputy Richard Renouf; Deputy Trevor Pointon; Deputy Rowland Huelin; Connetable Richard Buchanan (and other Members may be invited).

 

Timeline:

 

To undertake initial review of evidence by 31st July, 2018, with a view to  determining any next steps, and overall, to aim to conclude by the 31st October, 2018, to coincide as far as possible with the outcomes of the planning enquiry.

 

Records and reporting:

 

The Board will be supported by the Director-General, Growth, Housing and Environment, and staff supplied, and provided space to meet at the offices of the Future Hospital Team.

 

Notes of each meeting will be made, and the conclusions of the board will be provided to the Chief Minister and Infrastructure Minister, who shall supply to the Council of Ministers, and publish thereon.

 

 

Back to top
rating button