Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Revised North of Town Masterplan: Draft Report and and Proposition

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 16 July 2010 regarding revised North of Town Masterplan: Draft Report and and Proposition

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2010-0078

Decision Summary Title:

Revised North of Town Masterplan – Draft Report and Proposition

Date of Decision Summary:

15 July 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Director of Planning

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title:

Revised North of Town Masterplan – Draft Report and Proposition

Date of Written Report:

15 July 2010 

Written Report Author:

Director of Planning

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Revised North of Town Masterplan – Draft Report and Proposition

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the Report and Proposition, and in so doing withdrew P.57/2010

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Minister seeks the agreement of the States for the Revised North of Town Masterplan, following consultation on the original Masterplan.

Resource Implications: There will be costs in implementing the Revised Masterplan, as described in the projet, but not in adopting the Revised Masterplan itself

Action required:

That the Report and Proposition be lodged on 20 July and circulated immediately to States Members.  It is proposed that the proposition be debated at the 13 September 2010 sitting of the States

Signature:  

Senator F E Cohen

Position

Minister

Date Signed:

16 July 2010 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

16 July 2010

Revised North of Town Masterplan: Draft Report and and Proposition

NORTH OF TOWN MASTER PLAN  

PROPOSITION  
 

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion −  

to endorse the intention of the Minister for Planning and Environment to adopt the North St Helier Revised Masterplan dated 19th July 2010 (attached at Appendix 1) as an agreed development framework. 

NOTE

This proposition replaces P57/2010, which is withdrawn  

Senator F E Cohen

Minister for Planning and Environment 
 
 
 

 
 

REPORT  

BACKGROUND TO THE MASTERPLAN  

Introduction  

1.     Since 1995, there have been repeated calls for a Town Park to be created on the site of the Old Gas Works as a way of marking the Millennium, and numerous ideas and plans have been suggested as to how this should happen.

 

2.     However, whilst they have all been proposed with the best of intentions, they have failed to address  fundamental principles such as how the new park can be stitched into the existing urban fabric and become an integral part of the town, and how the project, including the provision of alternative parking, can be funded.

 

3.     This Masterplan is the first attempt to put the new park into its proper urban context, which respects the townscape and creates a park that repairs the urban character of this part of the town, creating a meaningful open space that is available to all, but in particular that the residential community of the area can use and enjoy. By creating additional linked amenity space on nearby or adjoining sites it significantly increases the amount of open amenity space in other parts of the area.

 

4.     The Masterplan centres on the site of the proposed Town Park and covers the area from Rouge Bouillon in the north to West’s Centre in the south, and St Saviour’s Road in the east to Halkett Place in the west.

 

5.     In March 2009 the Minister for Planning and Environment appointed Hopkins Architects, in conjunction with Robert Townshend Landscape Consultants and prominent local firm Naish Waddington Architects, to prepare a Masterplan for the northern part of St Helier.

 

6.     Hopkins Architects is one of the top architectural and masterplanning practices in the world and have won many international accolades for their pioneering, often complex, high quality projects. In consultation with local architects Naish Waddington, the practice developed a Masterplan of the highest quality for the future development of the north part of town.

 

7.     Hopkins’ plan demonstrates their careful understanding of how this part of town evolved, how it currently works and their expert interpretation of how it could work in the future. Their plan demonstrated how a new urban park can be carefully stitched into the fabric of the town to repair the townscape and provide meaningful space for the people who live there and those who pass though the area daily, be they shoppers, commuters, school children or tourists.

 

8.     The recent decision, following the debate on the Constable of St Helier’s proposition, to keep the Town Park site free of development, and the commitment of the Council of Ministers to commence construction of the Park in 2010 and complete it in 2011, has caused the Minister for Planning and Environment to re-appraise the proposals, and to engage with the landowners of large sites close to Town Park to evaluate the contribution they can make towards achieving the original aims of the Masterplan.  Several meetings have taken place since the start of 2010 between the Planning, Transport and Technical Services and Property Holdings Departments, with the owners of Le Masurier , Jersey Gas and the Jersey Brewery about their own proposals, and how they might contribute to the aims of the Masterplan.

 

9.     The earlier public consultation on the Masterplan produced many thoughtful and encouraging comments which have helped to refine the final version of the Revised Masterplan and the Minister for Planning and Environment now seeks endorsement from the States Assembly for its adoption.

 

10.     Appendix:

 

1.     The Amended Masterplan

 
 

THE MASTERPLAN CONSULTATION 

11.     Work on the Masterplan commenced in March 2009 and the draft was published for public consultation on 26 September 2009. Comments were invited on the following issues:

 

12.     The principle of regenerating the Northern part of Town.

§     The redevelopment of Ann Court to include residential development around three sides, enclosing a central public open space, with underground shoppers’ and residents’ parking.

§     The creation of a new town park, with perimeter residential development and underground commuters’ and residents’ car parking;

§     The redevelopment of Minden Place car park with a mixed use development with public open space.

§     Environmental improvements to Bath Street and David Place consisting of a one way north-bound traffic flow with wider pavements and landscaping.

§     The redevelopment of the Parish of St Helier’s Belmont Gardens car park which proposed a small residential development and public open space.

§     The creation of new pedestrian routes to connect Bath Street to Halkett Place, and Gas Place to Belmont Road.

§     The redevelopment of Green Street car park to provide additional commuter and residential parking to replace that lost in Gas Place, and residential development.

 

The Public Response to Consultation 

13.     The public consultation took place over 3 months and attracted over 450 responses, obtained from public exhibitions, surveys and written responses.

 

14.     The Public supported:

 

§     The principle of regenerating the North of Town;

§     The principle of providing more public open space in the town;

§     The provision of a town park on the Gas Place and Talman sites;

§     The creation of underground parking;

§     The redevelopment of Ann Court for residential, open space and underground parking uses;

§     The provision of open space and commercial development at the site of Minden Place car park once the car park reaches the end of its design life.

§     Environmental improvements to Bath Street and David Place and increased pedestrian permeability;

§     The provision of mixed-tenure housing to include affordable, social rent and homes for the elderly; and

§     The principle of funding the public amenity and environmental improvements from development receipts.

 

15.     Concern was expressed over:

 

§     The development of buildings on the Talman site and Gas Place and the impact this would have on the size of the park.

§     The loss of parking for residents and businesses at Gas Place, with potential damage to the viability of existing hotels and small businesses in the area as a result of less parking for clients. Extending parking capacity for commuters at Green Street car park was not considered to be a reasonable alternative.

§     The loss of parking at Minden Place which would be a problem for  the elderly and infirm;

§     The creation of a one way system in Bath Street, which could be detrimental to emergency services and existing businesses.

§     The construction of buildings on Belmont Road car park which would be detrimental to neighbouring residential property;

 

Picnic in the Park Event 

16.     In addition to the Minister’s formal public consultation, the Millennium Town Park Support Group held the Picnic in the Park event, which resulted in 230 comments and provided the following indication:

§     Nearly everyone who commented (221 people) supported the idea of creating open space in the town;

§     95 people specifically wanted a park with no new development on the site;

§     Only 10 people disagreed or felt the money should be spent on other things.

 

Ann Court Petition 

17.     On 27 November 2009, Deputy J A Martin of St Helier, lodged a proposition (P.202/2009) containing and supporting a petition containing 2,588 signatures opposing the (then) proposal to construct an above ground multi-storey car park on the site of Ann Court (to replace the spaces lost at the Town Park site and Minden Place car park).  The Deputy’s proposition, which the States agreed, was to abandon the car park proposal and charged the Council of Ministers to bring forward alternative proposals for the Ann Court site as part of the North of Town Masterplan.

 
 

THE REVISED MASTERPLAN CHANGES 

Open Space

18.     The overwhelming message from both the Minister’s consultation, and the Picnic in the Park event, was that more public open space should be created in the town. Accordingly, the proposals to include housing development on the Gas Place, Talman and Belmont Gardens sites have been removed.

 

19.     However, development is proposed on the Jersey Gas site at the western end of the Town park site for the following purposes:

 

§     To regenerate the area, particularly the residential community, which will help the Island’s housing needs;

§     To repair the townscape by providing attractive, appropriate scale, buildings for that part of the town. The buildings will provide a framework to the Town Park and in townscape terms will provide a counterpoint to the enclosure provided by the Odeon Cinema at the western end of the new town park;

§     To provide ‘people policing’ to ensure a safe community environment, all of the time, through natural surveillance of the Town Park;

§     To help revitalise that part of the town, providing a community focal point, where people can meet and relax; and

§     To generate economic benefits, employment and activity, through increased property values, cafes, restaurants, open air events and so on.

 
 

20.     The Masterplan seeks to deliver over 9 vergees of new public open space as shown in the table below. In addition, the development of the Jersey Gas site, the Jersey Brewery site and the Le Masuriers site will increase these figures

 

Approximate areas of new public open space 

Town Park    12,710m² 7v

Belmont Gardens    550 m²  0.3v

Ann Court     2480 m² 1.36v

Site of Minden Place CP  260m²  0.14v

Facing Old Fire Station  400 m²  0.22v 

Total     16,400m² 9.02v 
 

In addition, the development of the Jersey Gas site, the Jersey Brewery site and the Le Masuriers site will increase these figures.

 

Pedestrian and Cycle Links

21.     The Revised Masterplan proposes a number of new or improved pedestrian and cycle linkages through the north of Town area.  These include:

§     A major route running north-south along Oxford Road, from Springfield Stadium to the Town Park, extending across the Park to Belmont Road, Providence Street, Ann Court and Peter Street to West’s Centre;

§     A link from the Town Park, past the Odeon and Old Fire Station to Halkett Place, provided as part of the development of the Le Masurier  and Odeon sites, and properties owned by the company to the west;

§     A link from the Town Park through the Jersey Gas site to St Saviour’s Road;

§     A link from the Town Park, south to Belmont Place, then east to St Saviour’s Road as part of the development of the Jersey Brewery site; and

§     A link from the Town Park, via the Wine Warehouse and the former Le Masurier’s warehouse, then past the new Salisbury Crescent development to the bottom of Wellington Road.

 
 

Car Parking

22.     The loss of public car parking from Gas Place was a major concern and the originally proposed alternative for commuter parking at Green Street was considered to be too far from the area it serves. Accordingly the redevelopment of Green Street car park has been completely removed from plan, parking beneath Ann Court has been increased, and the provision originally intended below the Town Park, will now be made up as part of the development of nearby private sites, including the Jersey Gas and Jersey Brewery sites.

 

23.     Although Green Street car park has been removed from the plan, it is clearly an opportunity site for the States which will come forward as a separate development initiative in the future.

 

24.     Minden Place car park remains a popular and convenient shopper car park, and will remain in use until it reaches the end of its design-life in 2020.  However, its capacity will by then have been replaced at Ann Court, some 300 m away.

 

25.     The proposed underground car parks are based on traditional basement construction and conventional parking format. However, there are parking systems using state of the art technology which can significantly improve operational efficiency and reduce costs. Accordingly, if the plan is endorsed by the States, the Minister for Planning and Environment will ensure that the most appropriate and cost effective approach to underground parking is adopted.

 

Ann Court

26.     The proposition P202/2009 was considered by the States on 10 March 2010 when it was agreed that the proposal to develop Ann Court for an above-ground multi-storey car park should be abandoned.  The Revised Masterplan proposes 400 underground car parking spaces for shoppers (285) and residents (115).

 

Minden Place

27.     The relocation of Minden Place car park to Ann Court was a concern particularly for disabled drivers. Accordingly, it is proposed that the redevelopment scheme incorporates 10 disabled, short stay car parking spaces at street level. The Revised Masterplan proposes 25 underground car parking spaces for residents only and 10 on-street spaces for disabled drivers.

 

28.     In summary, proposed future public parking will be provided as shown in the table below.

 

Site  

Gas Place

Le Masurier site

Jersey Brewery site

Ann Court

Jersey Gas site

Minden Place (until 2020)

Nelson Street

 

Total

Existing public parking

390

 
 
 
 

240

50

 

680

Proposed public parking  

100

75 -100

285

125

10

 
 

595-620

 

29.     The numbers of shoppers’ car parking spaces increases and of commuter spaces reduce. The reduction in commuter spaces is in line with the Draft Sustainable Transport Policy and is supported by Transport and Technical Services.  .

 
 

THE MASTERPLAN

 

Key Intervention Sites

 

30.     The Masterplan takes a pragmatic look at the interventions that can be made and sites that can be developed by the States themselves.

 

31.     There are several sites owned by the Public and privately owned, the development of which can be co-ordinated to achieve the aims of the Masterplan. A balance between the costs of public realm improvements and the capital released from States development and contributions from private developments has been sought, with the intention that the developments will finance the public realm and parking improvements.

 

32.     It is considered important that the States can actively start development with its own funding stream without reliance on private finance. The States will take an active role to pump-prime the regeneration of the north of town area by creating the Town Park and redeveloping Ann Court. The Jersey Gas company has indicated that it is prepared to release its site for development, as part of an arrangement where the company relocates its operations from Tunnell Street to States land at la Collette. This pro-active approach will send a clear signal to local landowners that the North Town is an area worth investing in.

 

33.     The improved public realm, reduced traffic congestion, new parks and new developments will set the quality benchmark for other future, privately financed developments.

 

Privately Owned Development sites

 

34.     Other privately owned potential development sites have been looked at as part of the preparation this Masterplan, and discussions have taken place with most of the owners. Advice has been given on use and massing. The consultation has already prompted a number of key private land owners to think about redevelopment and discussions have taken place in advance of the Masterplan being endorsed by the States.  The sites, and the outline design and development guidance, comprise Appendix 3

 

Housing

 

35.     The original Masterplan brief (March 2009) asked for 100 lifelong and sheltered homes. Overall, the housing development proposed on Ann Court would yield around 180 2-bedroom apartments, although the actual mix of units and tenure will be decided when the schemes are implemented under the policies of the existing or new Island Plan.

36.     All private residential development sites identified on the Masterplan Proposals Map, which do not already have planning permission, will be required to provide affordable housing at the rate of 12.5% of the total number of homes provided.

 

37.     This requirement will apply immediately after the Revised Masterplan is adopted.  This rate will increase to 20% over the first five years of the new Island Plan, following its adoption.

 

Public Realm Improvements

 

38.     Public realm interventions proposed by the Masterplan can be summarised as follows:

 

§     Reinforcing and part-pedestrianising the main artery in the north town - Bath Street and David Place;

§     Creating new pedestrian and cycle routes as part of States and private development schemes

§     Locating public spaces on pedestrian routes;

§     Locating car parks, where feasible, below ground to free up space above ground for public realm and beneficial development;

§     Considering the creation of additional routes north-eastwards for residents and school children as part of future developments.

§     The particular needs of children in this area were highlighted during the consultation. Many of them live in apartments and bed-sits with no access to safe open space or private gardens. Family friendly local parks, gardens and squares, carefully planned throughout the area and linked by a safe pedestrian route, are therefore vitally important for this area.

 

39.     A safe pedestrian and cycle route which links Springfield stadium with Snow Hill is illustrated on the Masterplan.

 

KEY SITE PROPOSALS

 

40.     The following sites have specific proposals in the Revised Masterplan:

 

Gas Place and Talman sites

 

41.     These sites will deliver the new Town Park, although there will be no underground car parking or perimeter residential development as outlined in the original Masterplan.

 

42.     Remediation of the site is likely to commence towards the end of 2010, and will be followed by laying-out the Town Park which will be completed during 2011. 

 

Ann Court

 

43.     The Revised Masterplan proposes 15000m² of housing development (approximately 200 dwellings), enclosing public open space, with 400 underground car parking spaces for shoppers and residents.

 

Minden Place car park site

 

44.     This site is suitable for residential use on the upper floors, and retail and/or food and drink use on the ground floor. The development should be four storeys. The Revised Masterplan proposes approximately 30 residential units with 25 underground car parking spaces for residents only and 10 on-street spaces for disabled drivers.  A small south-facing public square is proposed as part of this development fronting Minden Place.

 

45.     The existing car park has a possible 10 years of life before it requires replacement, and will remain in place for this time. If Minden Place car park were retained into the long term it would mean continued traffic congestion associated with the need to draw traffic right into the centre of town through congested streets. However, by relocating the shoppers’ car park to Ann Court, this allows more direct access from the ring road, reducing the need for cars to enter the centre of town.

 

46.     The following proposed environmental improvements then become possible:

 

§     Minden Place can become a narrower road with wider pavements and on-street disabled parking and a more pedestrian-friendly crossing at the Bath Street junction;

 

§     Bath Street and David Place can become one-way (heading north), allowing the enlargement of pavements and the substantial reduction of traffic volumes. This becomes feasible when the shoppers’ car park access is no longer from Bath Street.

 
 

Jersey Gas site

 

47.     This large site is suitable for a significant new development for residential or other purposes, should it become surplus to the Gas Company’s requirements. This will only occur if the company can extend its site at La Collette onto States land. Discussions have taken place with the International Energy Group (the parent company) which has indicated a willingness to work with the States to achieve the States and its own commercial objectives.

 

48.     The Revised Masterplan proposes 24000m² of housing development (approximately 250-300 dwellings), enclosing public open space, with underground car parking spaces for residents.

 

49.     Any new buildings should be predominantly 5 storeys and will enclose further open amenity space and provide a pedestrian route to St Saviour’s Road. A review of the existing listed buildings on St Saviour’s Road will be undertaken to see if they merit their listing. 

 

50.     The site will be required to deliver 125 car parking spaces for general public use, which will be subject to a management agreement with Transport and Technical Services.  The site must be fully remediated as part of the redevelopment.

 

Partial pedestrianisation of Bath Street / David Place

 

51.     By making Bath Street and David Place one-way for north bound traffic only, the pavements can be widened, trees introduced and shared-space principles adopted. Future consideration will be given to extending this approach to Stopford Road, Victoria Street, Val Plaisant and St Mark’s Road.  The achievement of this aim is dependent on the eventual removal of Minden Place car park, and on the amount of traffic likely to be generated by development of the Le Masurier site.

 

52.     Should it not prove possible to make Bath Street and David Place fully one-way, there will still be the opportunity to achieve street improvements.

 

Bath Street to Halkett Place link

53.     A pedestrian route can be created that connects Bath Street with Halkett Place to provide a much needed east-west connection in this area. This link will require development of Le Masurier’s Bath Street and Odeon Cinema sites, including properties to the west of the Nelson Street car park site.

 

Belmont Gardens

54.     This Parish-owned site currently used as the market trader’s car park is suitable for redevelopment as a small local park, providing around 2,500m² of public open space. This project can go ahead once parking provision for the market traders is made available in Ann Court, the Jersey Gas site or the Le Masurier site.

 

Nelson Street car park site

55.     This site is suitable for residential use and open space, possibly associated with the Old Fire Station and the development of the Odeon Cinema.

 

56.     Proposals for the development area must ensure that the front of the Old Fire Station building is set within an appropriate urban setting, with suitable public space in front and furthermore, a route is provided that connects Bath Street with Halkett Place to provide a much needed east west connection in this area. This link is dependent on the development of the Le Masurier and Odeon sites being approved, when submitted as an application.

 

Planning guidance for other sites within the Masterplan Area

 

57.     There are numerous sites ripe for redevelopment in northern St Helier totalling around 220,000m².

 

58.     All private residential development sites identified on the Masterplan Proposals Map, which do not already have planning permission, will be required to provide affordable housing at the rate of 12.5% of the total number of homes provided.

 

59.     This requirement will apply immediately after the Revised Masterplan is adopted.  This rate will increase to 20% over the first five years of the new Island Plan, following its adoption.

 

60.     The masterplan makes specific recommendations for the following sites:

 

Former Le Masurier Warehouse

61.     As a going concern, this site could retain its existing warehouse use. However, if this site was to be redeveloped, it could offer an alternative site for residents’ car parking or an opportunity for residential development. Future development should be contained within the existing building heights.

 

62.     Any development should include a pedestrian route linking the Salisbury Crescent site with the historic buildings on the wine warehouse site, through to the Town Park on Gas Place.

 
 

Wine Warehouse

63.     Redevelop existing historic structures suitable for small scale retail together with food and drink use.

 

64.     Any new development should be sympathetic to the scale and materials of the existing historic structures and include provision for the proposed pedestrian route from Salisbury Crescent to the proposed town park.

 
 

Britannia Place site

65.     This site could be developed as a new 3 storey commercial/residential scheme with the main facades presented towards the new park.  The property is in multi-ownership which may militate against a comprehensive redevelopment.  It is hoped that the added-value of a view over the park, and the opportunity to increase the yield with a further floor of development will overcome this potential problem.

 

66.     Consideration will be given to establishing design codes to guide future development for this project.

 

67.     In redeveloping this site, service access should be provided from Tunnell Street, and consideration given to closing Robin Place and incorporating it within the public realm of the town park.

 

Le Masurier Bath Street and Odeon Cinema site

68.     The development of these sites presents a significant opportunity to regenerate this part of the town.  The site should be developed with a mixture of retail, office and residential development. On-site car parking provision should be limited to that necessary to serve the development itself

 

69.     Residential use in this location will help reduce the impact of cross-town traffic, which is a key component of the traffic strategy.

70.     Le Masurier Ltd. recently presented its proposals for the site, which include the demolition and redevelopment of the Odeon, to States Members.

 

71.     Consideration is being given to the current listing of the Odeon on Bath Street and whether it should be retained on the list.  Notwithstanding that reassessment, the proposals in their entirety can only be properly evaluated through the planning application process, supported by retail and traffic impact assessments.  An application is anticipated once the company has completed the revised impact assessments and its own public on-line consultation.

 

72.     The grain of new development should be sympathetic to the existing urban grain as detailed in the St Helier Urban Character Appraisal.

 

73.     The development should provide improvements to the public realm in the form of public open space and pedestrian permeability and should be developed as part of an overall plan in conjunction with the Nelson Street car park site.

 

Former Jersey College for Girls

74.     Proposals for residential apartments and town houses are already in preparation. The site now includes the rear section of the site, which was formerly occupied by Centre Point. This increases the total development area of the site by more than 60% to 3.4 acres and as such offers one of the largest residential regeneration opportunities in this part of St Helier.   Further development opportunities may become available on the Mont Cantel site currently occupied by Janvrin School.

 

Le Bas Centre

75.     This site could be considered for a suitable community use, for residential use or for public car parking. If residential, due attention should be given to the air quality and noise issues associated with the proximity of the site to St Saviours Road.

 

Wesley Chapel

76.     This site has permission for a mixed use redevelopment with a public square facing Wesley Street. A proportion of any residential development will be required to be developed as affordable housing. The site could be developed in conjunction with the adjoining Le Coin site and warehouse.

 

Jersey Brewery site

77.     The listed buildings on Ann Street and St Saviour’s Road should be retained and the site redeveloped, possibly with a commercial development at ground floor. The heights of any new buildings on Ann Street and Simon Place will reflect surrounding buildings. Development could be considered of up to 5 storeys within the centre of the site, and possibly 6 storeys to the west of the site to relate to the height of the listed Brewery Building.

 

78.     The site will be required to deliver up to 100 car parking spaces for general public use, which will be subject to a management agreement with Transport and Technical Services.

 

Charles Street (south) sites – (Le Coin and warehouse)

79.     These sites should be developed as a 4 to 5 storey residential scheme.

 

Mayfair Hotel site

80.     This site could be developed for residential accommodation. Any new development should address the air quality and noise issues associated with locating residential accommodation near a main, and heavily trafficked, road. The development should be of 3 storeys adjacent to St Saviour’s Road and Brooklyn Street, and up to 4 storeys on Ann Street.

 

Robin Hood Roundabout site (Springfield)

81.     Subject to it being acceptable in traffic terms, consideration should be given to removing the Petite Rue Du Val Plaisant and incorporating the land into an improved soft landscape area to the Springfield Stadium. The roundabout site would be suitable for multi storey long stay parking or parking with residential use over. If residential use is considered, due attention should be given to the air quality and noise issues associated with the proximity of the site to the Springfield Road, perhaps by incorporating a set back with soft landscaping to the north of the site.

 

Masonic Temple Car Park site

82.     The Masonic Temple car park site would be suitable for a 3 story residential development.

 

Assessment of Traffic Implications

 

83.     The proposals for the States owned sites will eventually improve traffic conditions in the Minden Place and Bath Street area, as the movement of shopper car parking provision to Ann Court, the Jersey Gas and Jersey Brewery sites, and to a lesser extent the Le Masurier site, will allow almost direct access to the Ring Road and obviate the need for traffic to penetrate the town centre for access to Minden Place car park via Bath Street.

 

84.     The emerging proposals for private sites will need to be considered carefully in the context of the cumulative impact of different developments on traffic generation.  The proposals for the sites referred to in Appendix 3 and the Masterplan Proposals Map, which are predominantly for residential use, are likely to be relatively benign in their impact as most work and shopping journeys will be made on foot.

 

85.     The combined impact of the proposed developments are being assessed by the Transport and Technical Services Department; the conclusions of which will be available to States Members before the States debate in September.

 

Financial Implications

 

86.     The Revised Masterplan is significantly different from the Original Masterplan as far as funding is concerned, as the loss of development value on the Town Park site will result in an inability to fund all the proposed infrastructure projects, such as car parking provision and street improvements, unless these can be achieved by the development of private sites. The original Masterplan would have effectively paid for itself, but the Minister is confident that the Masterplan is viable based on the proposed combination of private and States development.

 

Planning Gain and Tariffs

 

87.     It is proposed that the shortfall in car parking provision will be made up through private development projects, principally at the Jersey Gas and Jersey Brewery sites which can be directly accessed from the Ring Road, although the Le Masurier site may also contribute additional shoppers’ car parking depending on the results of the traffic assessment. This is likely to involve the States in revenue rather than capital expenditure. All three sites will have the capacity overnight to accommodate parking by residents of the North of Town Area.

 

88.     Developers of the private sites will be invited to make a financial contribution towards the public realm improvements proposed in the Revised Masterplan.  These will be negotiated through the Planning Obligation Agreement procedure, and are based on the premise that developments will benefit from the creation of parks, other open spaces, improved pedestrian routes and more attractive streets.

 

89.     The Revised Masterplan does not make any distinction between open market and affordable housing at this stage.  Market housing at Ann Court would clearly deliver a capital return to the States which can fund some infrastructure provision, but it would be necessary to find an alternative States site to accommodate affordable housing.  Private residential development on the identified sites will be required to provide a proportion of affordable housing in line with the draft Island Plan policy H3, which will apply immediately after the Revised Masterplan is adopted. The requirement will be to provide affordable housing at the initial rate of 12.5% of the total number of homes provided. This rate will increase to 20% over the first five years of the new Island Plan, following its adoption.

 
 

CONCLUSION

 

90.     In conclusion, the development and improvements proposed in the Revised Masterplan afford us the opportunity for the States to pump-prime the regeneration of the northern part of central St Helier. Development by the States of public sites, and the associated developments of the Le Masurier, Jersey Gas and Jersey Brewery sites will substantially increase the quantity and quality of public space and, for the most part, resolve car parking issues in the area.  Repair and improvements to the area will encourage further development of privately-owned sites, which can also provide the benefits of public car parking and open amenity space. Housing development, not just for social housing, will increase the population in the area which will benefit retailers and service providers in the northern part of the town centre and David Place.  Attractive and safe routes for pedestrians will permeate the area, and the proposals for Bath Street and David Place will have a traffic-calming effect as well as restoring the grandeur of this principle artery.

 
 
 
 
 

Senator F E Cohen

Minister for Planning and Environment 

 

 

Back to top
rating button