Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Ville a l'Eveque Cottage, La Rue de la Monnaie, Trinity: Appeal Decision P/2020/0515

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 30 September 2021

Decision Reference:  MD-PE-2021-0056

Application Reference: P/2020/0515

Decision Summary Title:

Appeal Decision – Ville a l’Eveque Cottage, La Rue de la Monnaie, Trinity

Date of Decision Summary:

18 August 2021

Decision Summary Author:

Principal Policy Planner – Strategic Policy, Planning & Performance

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

n/a

Written Report

Title :

Inspector’s Report- Ville a l’Eveque Cottage

Date of Written Report:

07 July 2021

 

Written Report Author:

D A Hainsworth LL.B(Hons) FRSA Solicitor- Planning Inspector

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Appeal under Article 108 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002 against a decision to grant planning permission for; “Demolish existing dwelling. Construct 3 no. four bed dwellings with associated garages, parking and landscaping” at Ville a l’Eveque Cottage, La Rue de la Monnaie, Trinity JE3 5DG.

Decision:

The Minister allowed the appeal and refused to grant planning permission for the following reasons:

 

  1. The proposed development would result in the demolition of an existing, habitable dwelling and its replacement with three new dwellings. Insufficient evidence has been submitted to satisfy the Minister that the existing dwelling could not be reasonably repaired or refurbished to bring it to an acceptable standard of accommodation.

 

    The proposal, therefore, fails to satisfy the requirements of Policy GD1, of the adopted Island Plan 2011 (amended 2014) which states that development proposals will not be permitted unless [inter alia] they will not replace a building that is capable of being repaired or refurbished. 

 

2. The proposed development would result in the loss of a cottage which retains some historical interest as an example of a single-storey rural property of 18th century origins; the frontage of which remains largely intact. Policy SP4 of the 2011 Island Plan (revised 2014) places a high priority on the protection of the island’s heritage assets which contribute to and define its unique character and identity.

 

Insufficient justification has been presented to suggest why the protection regime offered by Policy SP4 should not apply in this instance.

 

Reason for Decision:

The Minister agreed with the recommendations of the Inspector.

Resource Implications:

None.

Action required:

Request the Judicial Greffe to inform interested parties of the decision.

 

Signature:

 

 

 

 

Deputy John H Young

Position:

 

 

 

Minister for the Environment

Date Signed:

 

 

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button