Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Harbours (Amendment No. 41) (Jersey) Regulations 200-.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (25/01/2008) regarding: Harbours (Amendment No. 41) (Jersey) Regulations 200-.

Decision Reference:  MD-E-2008-0010

Decision Summary Title :

DS - Harbours (Amendment No 41) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Date of Decision Summary:

25th January 2008

Decision Summary Author:

Myra Shacklady

Business Development Director

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Harbours (Amendment No 41) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Date of Written Report:

4th January 2008

Written Report Author:

Pam Staley

Law Draftsman

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Harbours (Amendment No 41) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Decision(s): 

The Minister approved the Draft Harbours (Amendment No 41) (Jersey) Regulations 200- and asked that they be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for debate by the States Assembly.

Reason(s) for Decision:

To maintain income in order for Jersey Harbours to meet budgetary targets, generate sufficient funds for the upkeep, maintenance and capital programmes of the harbours and the Island’s territorial sea without resorting to central States funds.

Resource Implications:

Financial: see attached Report.

Manpower:  There are no manpower implications. Jersey Harbours however continues to make significant economies in its workforce.

There are no property or ICT implications.

Law drafting requirements are a routine annual requirement to existing legislation.

Action required:

Sarah Price to notify the States Greffe to lodge the amendment for debate by the States.

Signature: 

Senator Philip Ozouf

Position: 

Minister for Economic Development

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Harbours (Amendment No. 41) (Jersey) Regulations 200-.

REPORT  

HARBOURS (AMENDMENT NO 41)(JERSEY) REGULATIONS 200-  
 
 

Fines for leaving goods and equipment in the Harbour (Quay rentals)  

These charges are similar to parking fines.   

They are essential for maintaining the free movement of goods and equipment through the Harbour.  The Regulation prescribes a free period following which a daily fine is applied to encourage goods to move and make way for others.   

It is important that the effectiveness of the fine should remain and therefore it is recommended that these charges/fines be increased by 2.5%. 
 
 
 
 

Myra Shacklady

Business Development Director 
 

21st December 2007

 

Back to top
rating button