Indiquiplies House, Grande Route de Mont a L'Abbe, St. Helier

Information about the publication of Ministerial Decisions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision
providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (20.11.07) to grant planning permission for Indiquiplies House, Grande Route de Mont a L'Abbe, St. Helier.

Subject:	Indiquiplies House, St Helier Loft Conversions to Units 1 & 2
Decision Reference:	MD-PE-2007-0290	Exempt clause(s):		n/a
Type of Report (oral or written):	Written	Person Giving Report (if oral):		Richard Glover
Telephone or e-mail Meeting?	n/a	Report File ref:		RP/2007/1852
Written Report Title:	Determination of planning application	Written report – Author:		Richard Glover
Decision(s) – This application was discussed at a public meeting 28 September 2007, but the item was deferred by the Minister for further information. Amended plans were subsequently submitted and on the 20 November 2007 the Minister decided to grant Planning Permission for the scheme.
Reason(s) for decision: The conversion of the roofspace as demonstrated by the amended plans, with high level rooflights will not so detrimentally affect the nearby dwellings as to justify refusing the application
Action required: Issue planning permit and notify other interested parties
Signature: (Minister)			Date of Decision: 20.11.07

Indiquiplies House, Grande Route de Mont a L'Abbe, St. Helier - permission granted

Planning and Environment Department

Report

Application Number

RP/2007/1852

Site Address	Indequiplies House, La Grande Route de Mont A L'Abbe, St. Helier.

Applicant	Grange Developments

Description	Demolish unit and replace with 2 No. detached units. Alteration to vehicular access. AMENDED PLANS: Alteration to design and layout. FURTHER AMENDED PLANS: Alteration to design, form and layout of "House 2". Minor amendments to "House 1". REVISED PLANS: Loft conversion to Units 1 and 2.

Type	Revised Plans

Date Validated	31/07/2007

Zones	Built-Up Area

Policies	G2 –General Development Considerations

Summary/

Conclusion

This application seeks to make use of the roof space area of the two dwellings as previously approved. By re-arranging the first floor accommodation a formal staircase can be introduced to allow access to two rooms noted on the plans as a study and playroom along with a bathroom. All the rooms are lit by rooflights on the eastern elevation with cills at a height of 900mm. There are already habitable room windows on the eastern elevation and the closest dwelling to the east is some 20m away. As such the introduction of the rooflights will not significantly change the relationship of the properties with surrounding dwellings.

(Worthwhile, when there is a conflicting balance of considerations, to play devil`s advocate, then give reasons for reaching recommendation.)

Officer

Recommendation

Approve

Site Description	Site of a former bungalow now being replaced by two detached dwellings

Relevant Planning History	P/2006/1108 – Permission granted for the erection of two dwellings

Existing use of Land/Buildings	Residential

Proposed use of Land/Buildings	Residential

Consultations	Parish have no comments

Summary of Representations	A total of 4 letters or representation have been received in connection with this application. The letters raise concerns over the impact the windows that are the subject of this application will have. The letters also make comments on the elements of the development that have already been approved and as such are not directly relevant to the application under consideration.

Planning Issues	Policy Considerations (What are the presumptions) Policy G2 allows for developments provided they do not harm, amongst other things, the amenity of the area or surrounding occupants. Land Use Implications None Size, Scale & Siting (Design Statement submitted?) The size scale and siting of the dwellings remains as previously approved. Design & Use of Materials The design and materials of the dwellings remain as previously approved Impact on Neighbours Impact on surrounding properties will be little different to that previously accepted. The rooflights to serve the proposed rooms will not give the same outlook as a normal window due to their design. In any case the presence of first floor windows as approved have already established that the distance and orientation of the elevation is acceptable in terms of its impact on surrounding properties. Access, Car parking and Highway Considerations The properties provide the maximum number of car parking spaces required by the Ministers Parking Guidelines Foul Sewage Disposal As existing Landscaping issues None

Officer Recommendation	Approve

Conditions/ Reasons	None

Background Papers	1:2500 Location Plan Letters of representation nad applicant’s response to those letters Consultation responses (Also include correspondence from Case Officer – Possibly [pre-application advice & any other relevant material)

Endorsed by:

Date: