Chateaubriand, La Rue de Guilleaume et D'Anneville, St. Martin: Planning Application P/2019/1256: Appeal Decision

Information about the publication of Ministerial Decisions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision
providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 2 November 2020

Decision Reference: MD-PE-2020-0079			Application Reference: P/2019/1256
Decision Summary Title:	Appeal Decision – Chateaubriand, La Rue de Guilleaume et D’Anneville, St Martin, Jersey		Date of Decision Summary:	13 October 2020
Decision Summary Author:	Principal Policy Planner – Strategic Policy, Planning and Performance		Decision Summary: Public or Exempt?	Public
Type of Report: Oral or Written?	Written		Person Giving Oral Report:	n/a
Written Report Title :	Inspector’s Report- Chateaubriand		Date of Written Report:	14 September 2020
Written Report Author:	Philip Staddon BSc, Dip, MBA, MRTPI - Planning Inspector		Written Report : Public or Exempt?	Public
Subject: Appeal under Article 108 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002 against a decision to refuse to grant planning permission, P/2019/1256, for; “Install tennis court and associated fence to North-West of site.” at Chateaubriand, La Rue de Guilleaume et D’Anneville, St Martin, Jersey
Decision: The Minister dismissed the appeal and refused to grant planning permission for the following reason: The proposed tennis court and its high fence would be located within Field MN661 which is within the designated Green Zone, where Policy NE 7 sets a general presumption against all forms of development, in order to protect the quality and distinctiveness of the Island’s countryside. The proposal would not meet the Policy’s criteria for an exception as an ancillary residential structure, as it would not be well sited in relation to the house, being separated from it and located in an open field, such that it would appear as a harmful man-made intrusion into its open countryside context. As such, the proposal would be contrary to Policy NE 7 of the Adopted Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).
Reason for Decision: The Minister agreed with the recommendation of the Inspector.
Resource Implications: None.
Action required: Request the Judicial Greffe to inform interested parties of the decision.
Signature: Deputy John H Young		Position: Minister for the Environment
Date Signed:		Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):