Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

P.167/2010 Green Lanes Speed Limit - Amendment to proposition to decrease limit to 15mph

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 23 December 2010 regarding: P.167/2010 Green Lanes Speed Limit - Amendment to proposition to decrease limit to 15mph.

Decision Reference:  MD-E-2010-0211 

Decision Summary Title :

Amendment to proposition P.167/ 2010 – Green Lanes speed limit

Date of Decision Summary:

22/12/2010

Decision Summary Author:

 

Director of Tourism

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Amendment to proposition P.167/ 2010 – Green Lanes speed limit

Date of Written Report:

22/12/2010

Written Report Author:

Director of Tourism

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject:

Amendment to proposition P.167/ 2010 – Green Lanes speed limit

 

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the amendment to, P.167/2010 Speed Limits - Revised Policy, to remove article (A) (IV) a 20mph speed limit in Green Lanes and directed that these be lodged au Greffe for debate by the States on 18 January 2011.

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

To amend P167/ 2010 to remove article (A) (IV) a 20mph speed limit in Green Lanes

 

Resource Implications:

No financial or manpower implications

 

Action required:

This amendment to be lodged au Greffe to be debated by the States on 18 January 2011.

 

Signature:  Senator A.J.H.Maclean

 

 

Position: Minister

 

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

P.167/2010 Green Lanes Speed Limit - Amendment to proposition to decrease limit to 15mph

SPEED LIMITS (P.167/2010) – AMENDMENT

 

PAGE 2, PARAGRAPH (a)(iv)

 

For the words “20 miles per hour” substitute the words “15 miles per hour”.

 

 

 

MINISTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT


Report

 

Introduction

 

Jersey’s Island Plan made first mention of ‘Green Lanes’ in 1986, and was approved by the States of Jersey on 10th November 1987. The Plan referred to the identification of tree lined lanes which “were particularly attractive or of great character and antiquity” and stated that, “in co-operation with landowners, parishes and States’ departments, every effort would be made to ensure that their character is maintained”.

 

The Island Plan further stated that “the aim will be to maintain the quiet, unspoilt and natural character of the countryside for people to enjoy. The provision of facilities will be kept to a minimum and every effort will be made to control the impact of cars and car parking in the countryside”.

 

Quite simply, the Island Plan identified the need to maintain the natural beauty of the Island’s narrow, tree lined lanes and wished to create a sustainable leisure amenity for walkers, cyclists and horse riders where people, not the car, had priority.

 

The ‘Green Lanes’ in St. Peter with the distinctive road sign and 15 miles per hour speed limit were introduced on St. Peter’s day on 29th June, 1994.

 

Discussion

 

Whilst supportive of articles (a) (i) to (iii) and articles (b), (c) and (d) in the report and proposition, it is felt that it has been mainly written from a car user’s perspective and perhaps insufficient credence has been given to non car users of the Island’s road infrastructure.

 

There currently exists 50 miles of Green Lanes, some 10% of the total road infrastructure and this facility is a key part of Jersey’s walking and cycling offering.

 

It is felt that more cars will be encouraged to use these small lanes if the speed limit is increased – conversely making it less attractive for use for walkers, cyclists and horse riders.

 

UK Government statistics state that if someone is hit by a car at 20 mph they are 10% more likely to be killed than by a car travelling at 15 mph.

 

If the speed limit is increased, ‘Green Lanes’ will in effect, be no different to the remainder of the road infrastructure with a 20 mph speed limit.  Thus, the existing unique Green Lane sign will no longer be relevant and will have to be replaced at significant cost at a time when public expenditure is being reduced.

 

Jersey Tourism has, since the introduction of the Green Lane network, marketed the island as a premium walking destination with the result that a third of all staying leisure visitors now come to Jersey to walk (visitor survey 2008) (No of staying leisure visitors in 2009 - 340,500. On island staying leisure visitor spend £150 million 2009 ‘Jersey Tourism – a Year in Review’).  

 

In Tourism terms, the Green Lanes and other ‘soft adventure’ opportunities are of huge importance, particularly in the current economic climate and in competition with other tourism destinations:-

 

The existing Cycling (100 mile) network was developed by SUSTRANS, the Bristol based charity responsible for creating the UK's cycle network, and is based largely on and connected to the Green Lane network.  If the speed limit is increased, Jersey Tourism would no longer wish to recommend its use by visiting families and other staying leisure visitors on safety grounds.

 

The 100 mile Cycle network has cost over £1 million since its inception in 1997.  All funding has come from the Tourism Development Fund.

 

Jersey Tourism is aware of the huge interest in this award winning scheme from its European Markets. The concept of ‘Green Lanes’ and the fact that a small island had put “people before the car” has achieved enormous press coverage over the years in Europe, particularly in Germany, Holland, Switzerland and Scandinavia, where environmental concerns are given a high profile.

 

Jersey needs to protect its assets and unique selling points in the current economic climate. To lose the Green Lane network and to impact adversely on the existing Cycle network would cause irreparable damage to the Island’s visitor offering, and destroy the peaceful infrastructure in which we have invested so significantly for the benefit of both our visitors and local residents.

 

Green Lanes also form part of existing 'safe routes to schools’ and increasing the speed limit could dissuade parents from encouraging their children to walk to school which could impact on the current strategy regarding health and obesity.

 

There are no financial or manpower implications for the States of Jersey.

 

 

23 December 2011

 

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button