Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Refusal of 129 Homes at Bel Royal.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (14/08/2006) regarding P/2004/2247: Fields 848, 851, 853, 854, 861, 862A and 863A, Bel Royal, St. Lawrence.

Subject:

P/2004/2247: Fields 848, 851, 853, 854, 861, 862A and 863A, Bel Royal, St. Lawrence

Decision Reference:

MD-PE-2006-0111

Exempt clause(s):

None

Type of Report (oral or written):

Written

Person Giving Report (if oral):

None

Telephone or

e-mail meeting

n/a

Report

File ref:

8/37/01 and P/2004/2247

Written Report

Title:

n/a

Written report – Author:

Principal Planner

Decision(s): The Minister for Planning and Environment, in respect of the development of 129 Category ‘A’ homes, road widening and improvement, drainage infrastructure, public amenity space and a community building at Fields 848, 851, 853, 854, 861, 862A and 863A, Bel Royal, St. Lawrence determined to refuse the application.

Reason(s) for decision:

1. Overdevelopment

The proposed housing development would be an unacceptable overdevelopment of the site, contrary to the indication of yield included in the Island Plan, resulting in a development which is harmful to the character and amenity of the area and which will lead to unacceptable problems of traffic generation, contrary to Policies H8 and G2 of the Jersey Island Plan, 2002.

2. Site Boundary

The proposed housing development extends beyond the boundaries of the site zoned for Category ‘A’ housing purposes and encroaches into an area identified as ‘Important Open Space’, contrary to Island Plan Policies H2 and BE8.

3. Education

There is unreasonably inadequate capacity in the local States schools at Bel Royal Primary School and Les Quennevais Secondary School to accommodate the likely increase in the number of school aged children in their catchment areas generated as a consequence of the proposed development.

4. Noise Impact

The future occupants of the proposed housing development are likely to be exposed to unacceptable noise nuisance from the operations conducted at the nearby premises of Jersey Steel Co. (1935) Ltd due to its proximity and the failure of the applicants to demonstrate their ability to make adequate provision for noise mitigation.

5. Design

The design of the proposed new housing development is unacceptable in that it fails to adequately reflect relevance to Jersey, particularly in terms of form and architectural details; is insufficiently spacious; and would present an unsatisfactory appearance, detrimental to the character of the area; contrary to Policy G3 of the Jersey Island Plan, 2002 and the published ‘Design Principles’ of the Minister for Planning and Environment. .

Action required:

  Notify applicant, objectors and other interested parties of decision

Signature:

(Minister/ Assistant Minister)

Date of Decision:

14 August 2006

Back to top
rating button