Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Advance to Work and Advance Plus: Transfer of Scheme from Education, Sport and Culture to Social Security

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 29 June 2012:

Subject:

Transfer of Advance to Work and Advance Plus from ESC to Social Security

Decision  Summary:

MD-ESC-2012-0014 

Date of Decision Summary:

19th June 2012

Decision Summary Author:

Lynne Haws

ESC Finance Manager

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report Oral or Written):

Written

Person Giving Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report Title:

Transfer of Advance to Work and Advance Plus to Social Security

 

Date of Written Report:

19th June 2012

Written  Report Author:

Lynne Haws

ESC Finance Manager

Written Report:

Public or Exempt

Public

Subject:

Transfer of Advance to Work and Advance Plus from ESC to Social Security from September 2012 as part the Back to Work Scheme on a permanent  and recurring basis

 

Decision(s):  

 

The Minister approved the transfer of the accounting responsibility for Advance to Work and Advance Plus from ESC to Social Security with effect from 1st September 2012.  The transfer is permanent and recurring.  No funding is being transferred in 2012 as this will be provided from the Social Security Back to Work project.  Further funds of £950,000 included in the ESC base growth allocated MTFP are transferred to Social Security.  The scheme is proposed to be extended as part of the growth proposals for 2013 to 2015 and will be funded from Social Security

Reason(s) for decision:

 

  • The decision was taken to ensure that all projects that fall under the remit of the Back to Work project team sit in the same department, in order to have consistent treatment and approach across all schemes

Resource Implications :

 

  There are no budgetary implications for 2012 and the MTFP will reflect the move as a service transfer with £950,000 budget move from ESC to Social Security in 2013.  An FTE of 18/ Headcount of 20 will move to Social Security from ESC.

Action required: 

 

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:

 

 

Date Signed:

Date of Decision:

Back to top
rating button