Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

SpectrumTrading

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (11/12/2008) to revoke decision MD-E-2008-0065 and to direct that spectrum trading is not extended to the Island and that there is a separate award process for the digital dividend.

Decision Reference:   MD-E-2008-0237 

Decision Summary Title:

Spectrum Trading

Date of Decision Summary:

10 December 2008

Decision Summary Author:

 

Jason Lane

Director

Regulatory Services

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Spectrum Trading

Date of Written Report:

9 December 2008

Written Report Author:

Jason Lane

Director

Regulatory Services

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject:

Spectrum Trading

 

Decision(s):

The Minister revokes his decision MD-E-2008-0065.

 

The Minister directs that spectrum trading is not extended to the Island.

 

The Minister directs that there is a separate award process for the digital dividend.

 

The Minister directs the Director of Regulatory Services to request that Programme Making and Special Events management be part of the UK Band Manager’s Regime.

 

The Minister directs the Director of Regulatory Services to confirm to Ofcom and the JCRA his decisions regarding the above, and authorises the Director to liaise with the other Crown Dependencies as required.

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Minister, having noted there was no clear local industry view on spectrum trading, and having received new information from Ofcom indicating that available spectrum will be less than initially indicated, has reviewed his earlier decision MD-E-2008-0065. As a result he believes that Programme Making and Special Events management be part of the UK Band Manager’s Regime, whilst other parts of the award come under a separate, local process.

 

This course of action is likely to result in greater benefits to consumers in Jersey as innovative services can be targeted to the local market. This would not preclude any interested parties from outside the Island from expressing interest in any award process.

 

Resource Implications:

There are no financial or manpower resource implications with this decision.

 

Action required:

The Director of Regulatory Services is to notify Ofcom and the JCRA of the Minister’s decision.

 

The Director of Regulatory Services is to keep the process under review.

Signature: Senator P.F.C. Ozouf

 

 

Position: Minister

 

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SpectrumTrading

 

Economic Development

 

Regulatory Services

 

Spectrum Trading

 

One significant difference between Jersey legislation and the UK Communications Act is the provision for spectrum trading. Spectrum trading is a mechanism whereby spectrum licensed by Ofcom and paid for by a company, person or other legal entity may be traded (bought and sold) without having to undergo relicensing. The methodology is that the most efficient use of spectrum will come when market forces dictate utilisation and not through a purely regulatory regime. This seems attractive and acceptable as a concept, but it does give rise to a number of issues.

 

When the instructions were prepared for the 2003 Jersey Orders in Council, spectrum trading was deliberately omitted on the grounds that it was an untried or tested system and that the potential impact for Jersey could not be substantiated.

 

In February / March of this year, Ofcom was predicting that this 'dividend' would be quite significant and, on that basis a recommendation was made to extend spectrum trading. This was endorsed through Ministerial Decision MD-E-2008-0065 with the caveat that the Director of Regulatory Services continues discussions with Ofcom to confirm that this was in the Island's best interests. 

 

Volume of trading in the UK, according to information received from Ofcom, has so far been relatively low.  They suggest that this might be for a number of reasons but it is not unexpected that it should take time for a new market in spectrum to develop; and it is possible that the volume indicates that spectrum is generally already in the hands of those who, for the present, are generating greatest benefit from it.  Ofcom has stated that trading volume has never been seen as a touchstone for the policy and Ofcom remains convinced that spectrum trading has a valuable role to play in securing maximum benefits from spectrum over time while recognising that circumstances in the Crown Dependencies may differ from those in the UK.

 

Subsequently Ofcom has advised that much of the cleared spectrum in the Channel Islands will have very significant constraints placed upon it under the GE-06 Plan, which regulates frequency usage in the broadcast bands of Europe, Africa and parts of Asia. The Geneva 2006 (GE-06) Agreement establishes frequency plans for analogue and digital environments in these regions with the status of a binding international agreement.

 

The situation is further complicated because a definitive assessment of potential interference from France cannot be made until France finalises its own digital switchover plan.

 

At this stage Ofcom was informed that a targeted consultation needed to be undertaken with local spectrum users and the JCRA. The responses showed that there was no clear industry view.

 

 

 

 

The other two Crown Dependencies have taken separate routes on this issue.  The Isle of Man has opted out of the award process with the exception of Programme Making and Special Events, which is a specialised band on a small scale and with small power usage.  They are generally not commercial and typically include loudspeaker transmitters in churches, public meetings and the like.

 

Guernsey on the other hand has currently opted to take on spectrum trading en bloc as per the UK and would thus form part of their larger market.

 

Based on this information the Department has recommended that Programme Making and Special Events management be part of the UK Band Manager’s Regime, whilst the Minister has directed that other parts of the award come under a separate, local process. It is the view that this is likely to result in greater benefits to consumers in Jersey as innovative services can be targeted to the local market. This would not preclude any interested parties from outside the Island from expressing interest in any award process.

 

To that end the Minister is recommended to revoke the decision of MD-E-2008-0065 and proceed accordingly.

 

 

 

Jason Lane

Director of Regulatory Services

9 December 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button