Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Future of Rent Control.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (14/07/2009) regarding: Future of Rent Control.

Decision Reference:  MD-H-2009-0068

Decision Summary Title :

The future of the Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law 1946, including the Rent Control Tribunal and its membership.

Date of Decision Summary:

13 July 2009

Decision Summary Author:

Paul Bradbury, Director, Population Office

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

-

Written Report

Title :

The future of the Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law 1946, including the Rent Control Tribunal and its membership.

Date of Written Report:

13 July 2009

Written Report Author:

Paul Bradbury, Director, Population Office

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject: The future of the Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law 1946, including the Rent Control Tribunal and its membership.

Decision(s): To present to the States information on the future of the Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law 1946, including the Rent Control Tribunal and its membership.

Reason(s) for Decision: The Housing Minister considered it helpful to outline the future of the Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law 1946, including the Rent Control Tribunal and its membership, as outlined in the accompanying report.

Resource Implications: None

Action required: The Population Office to liaise with the Greffier of the States regarding the presentation of the Report to the States as soon as practical.

Signature: 

Position:

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Future of Rent Control.

MD-H-2009-0068

 

The future of the Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law 1946, including the Rent Control Tribunal and its membership  

On the 17th June, 2009, the States approved the re-appointment of the Rent Control Tribunal under the Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law 1946.  

At the time of the debate, various questions were raised about the composition of the Tribunal, and its remit and role, which should be responded to as a matter of record.  

The Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law 1946 offers a statutory facility to enable a private sector tenants to appeal to an independent body, the Rent Control Tribunal, to have their rent reduced where they consider it to be excessive. The Tribunal can then maintain or reduce the rent as it considers reasonable.  

The Law applies to rents on residential properties but not commercial property. It applies only to tenants, and lodgers do not have any rights under this legislation. Further, tenancy agreements entered into using the Standard Residential Standard Tenancy Agreement issued by the Population Office – being the best practice agreement between landlord and tenant – are exempt from the Law. This exemption is designed to encourage people to adopt this best practice agreement, which includes, for example, a 6 month notice period on tenancies of over 2 years, and links rent rises to the Retail Price Index.  

The current Tribunal has not been required to meet to adjudicate on any specific referrals in the past 3 years. The very limited activity of the Rent Control Tribunal in recent years may reasonably be seen as a positive point, with landlords and tenants reaching agreement without the intervention of a third party, something the Tribunal has always endeavoured to encourage. Notwithstanding this, the main reason the Tribunal sits so infrequently is because most rental increases have not been excessive when compared to the market rates, and factoring in any improvements made by the landlord to the property. In part, this reflects the current state of the market, where capacity has existed, and therefore landlords have been prevented simply by the state of the market from charging “excessive” rents as this would result in tenants seeking alternative accommodation. This is consistent with a market orientated approach to rents, which have been historically determined in Jersey by supply and demand, rather than widespread and interventionist mechanisms of rent control, with various social housing schemes and methods of financial support being made available to those persons not able meet market rents and prices.  

As to the role of the Tribunal, the Citizens Advice Bureau are very well aware of the existence of the Tribunal, and will refer cases to the Population Office where they see there may be merit, indeed, the Citizens Advice Bureau is most people's first port of call.  

Having outlined the above, where the Tribunal is not meeting with any frequency, and where appointment is required by Regulation every 12 years, it is evident that a review of this legislation is in order. Indeed, this has now been scheduled within officer time for the coming 12 months, and a report on the outcome will be placed before the States at the end of that period.  
 
 

This review is also timely as part of a wider review of landlord and tenant relations being conducted by the Population Office for the Housing Minister, which includes the presently lodged Residential Tenancy (Jersey) Law 200-, a review of options for the protection of residential deposits, the New Migration Mechanisms currently published for consultation, and a review of the Lodging Houses (Registration) (Jersey) Law, 1962 (to also take place within the same 12 month timescale).  

For completeness, the present members of the Rent Control Tribunal are as follows:  

Mr Eric Le Ruez  

Former Chief Executive Officer of the Housing Department and Director of the Property Holdings Department before his retirement in September 2007. Mr Le Ruez has vast experience in property matters, knowledge of legal procedures and the background to be able to determine in a just manner the issues coming before the Tribunal. First appointed in 2008. 

Mr Jeremy James Robin Johnson  

Qualified as an English Solicitor in 1974 and was admitted as Notary Public in May 1982. Since 1977 he has been a partner in Galsworthy and Stones (now Hawksford International) English Solicitors and is Head of Wills and Probate Department and an examiner for Notary Public examinations. Amongst other voluntary bodies he serves as a Member of the Parish Rate Appeals Board. First appointed in 2006. 

Mr Edward Trevor MBE  

Qualified Chartered Surveyor and chaired as an elected member local government Committees in the UK at local, regional and national level over a 40 year period covering a comprehensive range of issues including Health, Housing and Planning. He was a civil servant for the last 19 years of his working life involved with the management of a large number of properties for government departments. Amongst a significant number of other voluntary bodies, he is founder and Chairman of Shopmobility, St Helier, a Rates Assessor for St Helier and Chairman of the Association of Jersey Rates Assessors. First appointed in 2008. 

Mrs Mary Gaiger  

Mrs Gaiger is a former Sales Director of the Jersey Evening Post. Now retired, she involves herself in charitable work. She was a committee member of the GOSH (Great Ormond Street Hospital) Jersey Appeal 2003 –2006 and also does volunteer work at the Hospice. She is a founding member and Hon. Treasurer of Holidays for Heroes Jersey and also Hon. Treasurer of the Jersey branch of Brooke Hospital for Animals. She was first appointed a member of the Tribunal in 2002 and has given notice to the Population Office that she will stand down at the conclusion of her current term of office. Her long standing membership of the Tribunal has been greatly appreciated.

 

As to the selection of the members, in 2006 and 2008 respectively, the positions were advertised in the Jersey Evening Post, as follows; 

Tribunal Members together hear and determine referrals for reconsideration of rent payable in accordance with the Dwelling Houses (Rent Control) (Jersey) Law, 1946, as amended. There are a maximum of four Members altogether.  

The role of a Member of the Rent Control Tribunal is an honorary one and attracts no remuneration.  

Applicants are not necessarily expected to be property experts; however an interest in property matters, knowledge of legal procedures and a general business or administrative background would all be helpful.  

In addition Tribunal Members should be independent, impartial and confident; possess common sense, integrity and patience; and be able to determine in a just manner the issues coming before the Tribunal. 

As a result of these public advertisements, applicants were short listed against key selection criteria and informally interviewed. In 2009, it was decided that the members could be reappointed, and confirmation that this was satisfactory sought from the Appointments Commission. This was received. Indeed, the Appointments Commission confirmed that its main concern in situations of re-appointments is that terms in post are not so long as to deprive the organization of talent refreshment, with the upper limit on total term normally being ten years.  

At the time of the next reappointment of the Tribunal, the above mentioned reviews will be nearing completion, and appropriate action can be taken, whether than be amendment to the existing regulation to extend the term, which is most likely, or reappointment for a further period having undertaken appropriate procedures and having reported to the House in full.  

 

Back to top
rating button