Annual Business Plan 2009 (P.113/2008): Twelfth Amendment.

Information about the publication of Ministerial Decisions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision
providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (16/09/2008) regarding: Annual Business Plan 2009 (P.113/2008): Twelfth Amendment.

Decision Reference: MD-C-2008-0021
Decision Summary Title :	Annual Business Plan 2009 (P.113/2008): Twelfth Amendment		Date of Decision Summary:	09/09/08
Decision Summary Author:	Tom Le Feuvre		Decision Summary: Public or Exempt? (State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)	Public
Type of Report: Oral or Written?	Written		Person Giving Oral Report:	N/A
Written Report Title :	Annual Business Plan 2009 (P.113/2008): Twelfth Amendment		Date of Written Report:	08/09/08
Written Report Author:	Sue Duhamel		Written Report : Public or Exempt? (State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)	Public
Subject: Chief Minister’s Amendment to the Annual Business Plan 2009 (P.113/2008)
Decision(s): Further to the meeting of the Council of Ministers held on 4th September 2008, the Chief Minister agreed to lodge the following Amendment to the Annual Business Plan 2009 (P.113/2008): PAGE 2, PARAGRAPH (a) – In paragraph (a)(viii) after the words “pages 29 to 30” insert the words – “except that after success criterion (iv) in Objective 4 on page 30 there shall be inserted the following success criterion – ‘(v) Minimum service level for processing changes of circumstances relating to Income Support households occupying rental accommodation established.’
Reason(s) for Decision: This Amendment has been lodged by the Chief Minister less than 14 days before the start of the debate in accordance with the provisions of Article 11(5) of the Public Finances (Jersey) Law 2005. Paragraphs (4) and (5) of Article 11 are in the following terms – A draft annual business plan is not capable of being amended during a debate in the States on the draft except in accordance with an amendment lodged at least 14 days before the start of the debate. Paragraph (4) does not apply to an amendment moved by the Chief Minister if the States agree that the amendment may be debated forthwith or at a time approved by the States. In accordance with the provisions of paragraph (5) the Chief Minister will seek the agreement of the States to debate this Amendment during the debate on the Annual Business Plan 2009. The rationale for lodging this Amendment is laid out in the attached report.
Resource Implications: Nil
Action required: Strategic Planning Manager to arrange for the Twelfth Amendment to the Annual Business Plan 2009 to be lodged au Greffe for debate by the States Assembly.
Signature:		Position: Senator Frank Walker, Chief Minister
Date Signed:		Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Annual Business Plan 2009 (P.113/2008): Twelfth Amendment.

Written Report

CHIEF MINISTER’S DEPARTMENT

Annual Business Plan 2009 (P.113/2008): Twelfth Amendment

(Public)

Introduction

The Amendment (P.113/2008/Amd.) proposed by Deputy Southern sought to place an additional commitment within the Housing Department’s Business Plan objectives.

The Chief Minister, with the support of the Minister for Social Security, is proposing this replacement Amendment, setting an additional objective against the Social Security Department.

Background

Income support is administered by the Social Security Department.

The Income Support system replaced rent abatement and rent rebate and the budget for those schemes held by the Housing Department has been transferred to the Social Security Department. Likewise the staff previously administering rent abatement and rent rebate have also been transferred to Social Security. The Housing Department has no role in the administration of Income Support.

Rent arrears cannot be incurred due to a delay in the processing of an Income Support claim. However, if a change of circumstance, such as an increase in income, is not notified to the Social Security Department in a timely fashion, then the Department has the power to recoup the overpayment of benefit paid during this time. This would be done by reducing the level of future benefit available for a period of time until the overpayment has been recovered.

The introduction of Income Support has led to a significant decrease in the number and value of Housing Department rental arrears. This is of benefit principally to the individual tenants, who no longer have the worry of being in debt.

The report set out by the Deputy refers to a specific case under the previous rent abatement scheme, at that time under the administration of the Housing Department.

Proposal

Whilst the original amendment was wholly unnecessary as the Social Security Department is already committed to the timely processing of applications, to oppose it might suggest that the Social Security Department is unwilling or unable to provide efficient administration. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Chief Minister has therefore lodged this amendment so that the intention of the Deputy can be included in the 2009 Annual Business Plan. This Amendment :-

Places the responsibility for the administration with the correct department
Refers to Income Support claims rather than the accommodation component, as it is impossible to process a single component in isolation from the whole claim
Identifies the claimants that occupy rental accommodation as this appears to be the area of concern for the Deputy
Removes the phrase “service level agreement” which is a term normally used to describe an agreement between organizations in which one organization provides a service on behalf of the other one, as opposed to a customer service target between the Department and many applicants

This Amendment will add an extra success criterion to the Social Security Department objective -

“Deliver benefits and high quality services now and in the future”

Financial or Manpower Implications

There are no manpower or financial implications to the amendment.

Written by:

Approved by:

S.Duhamel/09.09.08