Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Jersey Aircraft Registry: Financial Case for Establishment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 5 August 2014:

Decision Reference: MD-E-2014-0076

Decision Summary Title :

Financial Case for the Jersey Aircraft Registry

Date of Decision Summary:

31 July 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

Strategic Policy Manager

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Financial Case for Jersey Aircraft Registry July 2014

Date of Written Report:

31 July 2014

Written Report Author:

Strategic Policy Manager

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:

Financial Case for the Jersey Aircraft Registry.

Decision(s):

The Minister decided to present the ‘Financial Case for the Jersey Aircraft Registry’ to the States.

Reason(s) for Decision:

During the States debate on the Aviation Legislative Bundle on 8th July 2014, the Minister for Economic Development gave an assurance to the States Assembly, and particularly the Economic Affairs Scrutiny Panel, that he would present a financial case for the development of the Jersey Aircraft Registry to the States.

Resource Implications:

There are no financial or manpower implications for the States in the presentation to the States of this Report.

Action required:

Greffier of the States to be requested to arrange for the attached Report to be presented to the States for their information at the earliest opportunity.

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Minister for Economic Development

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Jersey Aircraft Registry: Financial Case for Establishment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Case for the Jersey Aircraft Registry

 

Economic Development Department

 

July 2014


1.      Introduction

During the States debate on the Aviation Legislative Bundle on 8th July 2014, the Minister for Economic Development gave an assurance to the States Assembly, and particularly the Economic Affairs Scrutiny Panel (‘the Panel’), that no further development would take place on the establishment of the Jersey Aircraft Registry until such time as the Panel were satisfied with the financial forecast for the proposed registry. Whilst the Panel has now agreed to the presentation of this particular financial report and therefore the continued development of the JAR, it will maintain an active interest and involvement in its establishment, including addressing its outstanding concerns regarding matters contained in supporting documentation due to be addressed within the operational business case.

This paper details the establishment costs for the JAR including costs incurred working with Guernsey on the abortive attempt a joint Channel Islands registry.  In addition, there are details of the proposed annual revenue costs and likely income that will be generated, on a ‘break even’ basis over the first five years.

Supporting background documentation includes details of the benefits, competition and potential market, an outline of the Jersey proposition as well as an assessment of the options for delivery.

2.      Budget

There are two distinct phases to the business model: the establishment costs and the ongoing revenue costs.

The following budget breakdown (Table 1) details the establishment costs for the JAR.  Whilst substantial, the Economic Development Department has budgeted to cover these costs.

The establishment costs include:

  1. A contribution towards the Strategic Outline Case for a joint Channel Islands Aircraft Registry,
  2. A report commissioned by Economic Development to consider a Jersey only aircraft registry
  3. Costs associated with seeking a legal opinion on the  joint venture with Guernsey
  4. Legal costs incurred contesting the registration of the name Channel Islands Aircraft Registry Limited and contesting the use of the branding of the Channel Islands Aircraft Registry.
  5. Professional Services in relation to the development of the aviation legislative bundle and establishment of the JAR
  6. IT costs for the online registration of aircraft and aircraft engines based on the IT solution being part of the well-established and highly regarded Security Interest Registry.
  7. Contractor Establishment Costs borne by the preferred Technical Services Provider but  will be passed onto Economic Development – this figure is based on the submissions from the Tenderers for preparing the requisite reports/manuals and training of staff.
  8. Civil Aviation Pre-audit - before the JAR can register its first aircraft, the UK authorities, for which JAR will be a sub-registry, the CAA must be satisfied that the JAR has the necessary governance, processes and procedures in place.

To date (July 2014), just over £130,000 has spent on the development of an aircraft registry.

Table 1 – One-off establishment Costs

* includes all costs, from 2011 onwards, associated with the concept of the establishment of an aircraft registry

 

The following table (Table 2) outlines the ongoing revenue costs for the next 5 years and the income required to cover these costs.  In compiling the financial forecast, the following assumptions have been made:

  1. Staff costs – the job description for the Registrar has been Hay Evaluated at a G12, and the individual will be recruited for the last 4 months of 2014.  Existing Economic Development staff will support the Registrar in the performing the functions. If registrations increase significantly, it will be necessary to recruit a Deputy Registrar. The Registrar will be tasked with the production of a business plan for the JAR.
  2. Property costs – office space required by the Registrar (C.500 sq ft) at £12 per sq ft, based on current market leasing opportunities.
  3. IT and Communications – having developed the online registration process, an annual service contract will be required.  For 2014, this has been calculated for the last 4 months of the year.
  4. Insurance – it will be necessary to take out an insurance policy.  The Cayman Islands and Guernsey have entered into a Group Policy that covers up to $30 million dollars for any one incident to cover investigations and recovery if required.  There is a joining fee to become part of the consortium of $10,000 (£5,800) plus a charge per aircraft on the register of £150, based at 01 January each year.  The Isle of Man have a similar policy and negotiations have not yet taken place with them to see if a better deal can be reached.
  5. AAIB charge – The Air Accidents Investigations Bureau is part of the Department for Transport and is responsible for the investigation of civil aircraft accidents and serious incidents within the UK and its overseas territories.  In addition to the insurance, and as a contribution towards the cost of these services in the event of an accident, a charge will be levied on each aircraft registered on the JAR at a cost of £50 for simple aircraft and £120 for complicated aircraft.  The charge will be levied on the number of aircraft as at 01 April of each year.  In the calculations it is assumed that in 2015, and thereafter that a quarter of the annual registrations will take place before 01 April.  For ease a charge of £90 has been assumed.
  6. Training & Promotion – the Registrar will be required to keep up-to-date on specific requirements with regard to aircraft registration.  In addition, it will be important to promote the JAR at exhibitions and conferences such as EBACE.
  7. CAA Audits – as part of good governance the CAA will audit the JAR on a regular basis.  After undertaking the initial pre-audit in 2014, it is assumed that a full blown audit will be undertaken in 2016 and thereafter on a triennial basis.
  8. Registrations – it is assumed that following initial registrations, aircraft will remain on the JAR for a minimum of 4 years and that there will be one new registration per month from 2015.
  9. Financial Benefits – the financial forecasts are based on the average net income that the Isle of Man Government receives for both the initial registration and annual ongoing Certificate of Airworthiness.  This figure, for initial registration, will vary from between £1,000 to over £30,000 for large ‘parked aircraft’.
  10. The financial forecast is based on an average total revenue cost of £126,000 for the full 4 years – 2015 – 2018 with an average total revenue income of £188,000 over the same period leaving a net average income of £62,000 per annum.
  11. No account has been taken for the costs of the Technical Service Provider as the charge will be passed directly onto the client with a Registry administrative charge.  A Scheme of Charges will be agreed between the Registrar and the Contractor.  A further Scheme of Charges will be published that will include the charges for the Technical Service Provider.  With the latter, a sum will be incorporated for the JAR administration fee.  For example the Technical Service Provider may charge £130 per hour for undertaking airworthiness surveyor work and the published charge would be £150 per hour to include the administration fee.
  12. No fee income has been calculated for the registering of commercial aircraft engine mortgages.  There is little work involved for the Registry, and the fee income is likely to be low in comparison to registering aircraft.

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 – Costs and Benefits (rounded figures)

* The initial Registration fee will be £8,000 and the Renewal fee £4,000 with 2.5% increase after the first year in line with States policy.

Back to top
rating button