Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Water (Jersey) Law 1972 - Duty to Monitor Water: Approval of Jersey Water programme for 2012

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 4 November 2011:

Decision Reference:  MD-PE-2011-0107 

Decision Summary Title :

Water (Jersey) Law 1972 - Duty to Monitor Water

Date of Decision Summary:

03/11/11

Decision Summary Author:

 

Head of Water Resources - Environmental Protection

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

Water (Jersey) Law 1972 - Duty to Monitor

Date of Written Report:

03/11/11

Written Report Author:

Head of Water Resources - Environmental Protection

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Subject:  Water (Jersey) Law 1972 - Duty to Monitor Water

 

Decision(s):

Approval by The Minister for Planning and Environment of the monitoring programme submitted by The Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited (Jersey Water) for the calendar year 2012.

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

Under Article 10(4) of the Water (Jersey) Law 1972 as Amended, Jersey Water is required to submit details of its monitoring programme each year to the Minister for Planning and Environment for his approval.

 

The monitoring programme has been reviewed by the Department, in consultation with Health Protection of Health and Social Services, and is deemed fit for purpose.

 

The monitoring programme is based on best practice in England and Wales.

 

Resource Implications:

Nil

Action required:

Notify Jersey Water confirming approval of the monitoring programme for 2012.

 

Signature:

 

 

Deputy R Duhamel

Position:

 

 

Minister

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Water (Jersey) Law 1972 - Duty to Monitor Water: Approval of Jersey Water programme for 2012

 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

 

ENVIRONMENT DIVISION

 

WATER (JERSEY) LAW 1972

ARTICLE 10 – DUTY TO MONITOR  
 

(Public)

 

 

 

Purpose of the Report

 

The Minister for Planning and Environment (The Minister) is requested to approve the proposed monitoring programme of treated water for 2012 that was submitted by The Jersey New Waterworks Company Limited (Jersey Water).

 

Background

Under Article 10(4) of the Water (Jersey) Law, 1972 as Amended, Jersey Water is required to submit its monitoring programme for treated water each year for the approval by The Minister.

Discussion

 

The monitoring programme submitted has been reviewed by the Department of the Environment in consultation with Health Protection of Health and Social Services and is deemed fit for purpose.

 

A copy of the proposed monitoring schedule for 2012 is attached to this report. 

 

The monitoring programme is based on best practice in England and Wales in accordance with The Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2000 (England and Wales).

 

Jersey Water proposes three changes to its 2011 monitoring schedule:

 

  1. The adoption of the standard monitoring frequency regime, as set out in the Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2000 (England and Wales);

 

  1. Ceasing to monitor for Organochlorine and Organophosphorous pesticides and;
     
  2. Ceasing to monitor for Dalapon.

 

Jersey Water is adopting a targeted and cost-effective risk-based approach to its monitoring programme; whereby the sampling frequency, location and the determinants sampled is based on a thorough examination of use (likely occurrence) and risk to the water supply.

 

 

 

 

With respect to the first proposed change, Jersey Water has several years’ worth of historic water quality data providing a scientifically robust justification to move to the standard monitoring frequency as set out in the Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2000 (England and Wales).

 

The cessation of monitoring for Organochlorine and Organophosphorous pesticides is deemed a reasonable risk based approach, given that these types of pesticides are not imported into the Island in any significant quantity and have not been detected within the water supply.

 

Whilst Dalapon is a pesticide, it can also be produced as a disinfection by-product during the chloramination water treatment process used by Jersey Water. The cessation of monitoring for Dalapon on the water supply side is reasonable as it has been demonstrated that the occasional detections of Dalapon within the water supply (at concentrations well below any health-based values) are associated with the disinfection process rather than any pesticide product present in raw waters. As an additional safeguard, Dalapon will continue to be monitored within raw waters prior to treatment

 

 

Recommendation

 

  1. The Minister approves the proposed monitoring programme submitted by Jersey Water for the calendar year 2012.

 

ii.               Notify Jersey Water confirming approval of the monitoring programme for 2012.

 

 

Written by: Head of Water Resources, Environment Department

 

Approved by:   

 

 

Attachments:

Proposed Regulatory Monitoring Schedule for the Year 2012- Jersey Water

 

[File Ref]

Ministerial Decision ref:

03 November 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proposed Regulatory Monitoring Schedule for the Year 2012

 

Water Supply Zones

 

The sampling frequencies set out in The Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2000 (England and Wales) are based on the population size of the zone. The population of the Island is 89,300 and the Company supplies approximately 90%; therefore the population supplied is approximately 80,000.

 

For the purposes of the setting the sampling frequencies, the population size will be taken as 100,000 and the Island taken as one supply zone.

 

Table 2 in schedule 3 of the Regulations sets out the frequency of sampling the water supply zones as listed below. The proposed sampling frequency per zone is highlighted in bold.

 

Table 2

 

Check monitoring

Parameter

Population size

Reduced

Standard

E.coli

<100

≥100

 

4

12 per 5,000 population ie 240

Coliform bacteria

Residual disinfectant

Aluminium

<100

100-4,999

5,000-9,999

10,000-29,999

30,000-49,999

50,000-79,999

80,000-100,000

1

2

6

12

18

26

38

2

4

12

24

36

52

76

Ammonium

Clostridium perfringens (including spores)

Colony counts

Colour

Conductivity

Hydrogen ion

Iron

Manganese

Nitrate

Nitrite

Odour

Taste

Turbidity

 


Table 2 (cont’d)

 

Audit monitoring

Parameter

Population size

Reduced

Standard

Aluminium

<100

100-4,999

5,000-100,000

 

1

4

8

Antimony

Arsenic

Benzene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Boron

Cadmium

Chromium

Copper

Cyanide

1,2 dichloroethane

Enterococci

Fluoride

Iron

Lead

Manganese

Mercury

Nickel

Nitrate

Nitrite

Pesticides and related products

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Selenium

Sodium

Trichloroethene

Tetrachloromethane

Trihalomethanes

Chloride

Sulphate

Total organic carbon

Tritium

Gross alpha

Gross beta

 

The Company uses aluminium sulphate as a flocculant in the primary treatment process, therefore the sample frequency for aluminium will be at the check monitoring frequency.

 

As the water the Company uses originates from, or is influenced by, surface waters, the sampling frequency for iron, manganese and Clostridium perfringens (including spores) will be at the check monitoring frequency.

 

The Company uses the chloramination disinfection process, therefore the sampling frequency for nitrate and nitrite will be at the check monitoring frequency.


Treatment Works and Supply Points

 

The Company has two water treatment works located at Augres WTW and Handois WTW. Both treatment works use clarifiers (chemical assisted sedimentation) for primary treatment, followed by rapid gravity filtration using dual media (anthracite and sand). During 2010 Augres WTW supplied an average of 10,160 m3/d and Handois WTW 9,617 m3/d.

 

The Company has a treated water service reservoirs (SR) at Westmount Road, St. Helier (9Ml capacity) and Les Platons, Trinity (9Ml capacity).

 

For the purpose of the monitoring regulations, Augres WTW and Handois WTW will be referred to as treatment works and all of the above sites (Augres WTW, Handois WTW, Westmount SR and Les Platons SR) will count as supply points.

 

Table 3 in schedule 3 of the Regulations sets out the frequency of sampling the treatment works or supply points as listed below. The proposed sampling frequencies are highlighted in bold.

 

Table 3

 

Item no

Substances and parameters

Volume of water supplied m3/d

Reduced

Standard

1

E.coli

<20

20-1,999

2,000-5,999

6,000-11,999

>12,000

 

12

52

104

104

4

52

104

208

365

2

Coliform bacteria

3

Colony counts

4

Nitrite

5

Residual disinfectant

6

Turbidity

Subject to check monitoring

7

Clostridium perfringens

10,000-15,999

16,000-32,999

26

52

52

104

8

Conductivity

Subject to audit monitoring

9

Benzene

<20

20-999

1,000-49,999

50,000-89,999

90,000-299,999

300,000-649,999

≥650,000

 

1

4

8

12

24

36

48

10

Boron

11

Bromate

12

Cyanide

13

1,2 dichloroethane

14

Fluoride

15

Mercury

16

Nitrite

17

Pesticides and related products

18

Trichloroethene     }

Tetrachloroethene }

19

Tetrachloromethane

20

Chloride

21

Sulphate

22

Total organic carbon

23

Tritium

24

Gross alpha

25

Gross beta

Parameters labelled as items 1 to 6 for sampling at the treatment works only.

 

Parameters labelled as items 7 to 25 are for sampling at supply points.

 

The Company uses the chloramination disinfection process, therefore the sampling frequency for nitrite will be at the check monitoring frequency as listed under item 4 in table 3.

 

As the water the Company uses originates from, or is influenced by, surface waters, Clostridium perfringens (including spores) will be sampled as part of the check monitoring in supply points.

 

The Company does not add sodium hypochlorite after the water has left the treatment works, therefore audit monitoring for bromate (a possible disinfection by-product) shall take place at the supply points.

 

All check monitoring will take place at the standard frequency as indicated in the above tables, with one exception if it is granted. The exception the Company would like to apply for the frequency of nitrite monitoring at treatment works to be at the reduced rate. Results for the last two years have been below the EU regulatory limit of 0.1 mg/l, the highest result being 0.009 mg/l.

 

It is proposed that analysis for the parameters given in the monitoring schedules will be undertaken by either the Company laboratory or their consulting analysts.

 

 

22nd June 2011

 

 

Pesticides analysed for at the supply points and in the supply zone

 

 

Phenoxyalkanoic Acid Herbicides    Oxynil Herbicides

 

Pentachlorophenol (PCP)  2,4-D.B.   Bromoxynil

M.C.P.A.    Chlorthal   Ioxynil

2,4-D     Triclopyr

Mecoprop    Dichlorprop   Triazole

2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid Dicamba

2,3,6-Trichlorobenzoic acid  M.C.P.B   Propiconazole

         Tebuconazole

 

Urea Herbicides      Triazines

 

Chlortoluron  Isoproturon    Atrazine  Simazine

Linuron   Diuron     Prometryn  Propazine

Carbetamide  Monolinuron    Trietazine  Terbutryn

Methabenzthiazuron      Terbuthylazine  Cyanazine

 

          

Carbamate     Others    

          

Chlorpropham     Glyphosate

Oxamyl      Bentazone

      1,3 Dicloropropene (cis)

      1,3 Dicloropropene (trans)

      Chlorthal-dimethyl

 

Back to top
rating button