Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Minister for Planning and Environment: Powers (P132/2010): Ministerial Comment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 25 October 2010 regarding a ministerial comment on the proposition: Minister for Planning and Environment: Powers (P132/2010)

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2010-110

Decision Summary Title:

P.132/2010 – Minister for Planning and Environment: Powers

Date of Decision Summary:

22 October 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Acting Assistant Director Performance and Operations

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title:

P.132/2010 – Minister for Planning and Environment: Powers

Date of Written Report:

22 October 2010

Written Report Author:

N/A

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

N/A

Subject: Comments by the Minister for Planning and Environment in relation to “P.132/2010 – Minister for Planning and Environment: Powers” as submitted by Deputy Le Herissier

Decision(s):

The Minister decided to present comments on P.132/2010 to the States

Reason(s) for Decision:

So as to respond to the proposition

Resource Implications:

None

Action required:

The Greffier of the States to be requested to arrange for the comments to be presented to the States

Signature:  

Senator T Le Sueur (in the absence of Senator Cohen)

Position:

Chief Minister

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Minister for Planning and Environment: Powers (P132/2010): Ministerial Comment

P.132/2010 – Minister for Planning and Environment: Powers

Deputy R. Le Herissier of St Saviour 

Comments of the Minister for Planning and Environment 

As Minister for Planning and Environment I welcome and support the Deputy’s proposition that ministerial powers and the manner in which planning decisions are made should be reviewed by the Policy and Procedures Committee.   

Early in my term of office as  Minister I identified that the Planning and Building Law conferred great responsibility on a single person and I pointed out the risks of single person decision making.  However the system of Ministerial government vests decision-making authority in individual ministers and PPC will no doubt consider whether Planning is different from any other portfolio. 

The number of decisions made by the Minister is relatively small but all decisions are made under the Minister’s delegated authority. The Planning Applications Panel deals with far more applications than the Minister, and was specifically established to replace the former Committee and Applications Sub-Committees. However the vast majority of planning applications continue to be determined by planning officers with little or no political involvement. 

I have introduced a number of processes to improve the transparency and accessibility of ministerial decision making. 

Firstly, I introduced the Public Ministerial hearing system of holding ministerial determinations in public to improve public access and increase transparency. 

Secondly, about a year ago I extended the system and the Minister now sits at Ministerial Public Hearings with the Assistant Minister and the Chairman of the Planning Applications Panel. They act as advisors but the effect is to widen the decision making process. 

Thirdly, a process review of the whole planning process is currently underway by external planning experts. this will cover the decision making processes and it’s findings will help in the process of improving decision making. 

In conclusion whist I have confidence in the mechanism of decision making it can undoubtedly be improved and I welcome this proposition. 
 

Senator F E Cohen

Minister for Planning and Environment

22 October 2010

 

Back to top
rating button