Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Tourism (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 1990: Amendment: Law drafting instructions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 15 April 2015:

Decision Reference:  MD-E-2015-0018

Decision Summary Title :

Amendment to the Tourism (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 1990 - Requirements to Register – Dining Accommodation Capacities

Date of Decision Summary:

 15 April 2015

Decision Summary Author:

Hospitality and Leisure Manager

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Amendment to the Tourism (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 1990 - Requirements to Register – Dining Accommodation Capacities

Date of Written Report:

15 April 2015

Written Report Author:

Hospitality and Leisure Manager

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:

Amendment to the Tourism (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 1990 - Requirements to Register – Dining Accommodation Capacities.

Decision(s):

The Minister agreed to the amendment of Article 4(1)(s) of the Tourism (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 1990 and to the submission of the necessary Law drafting instructions.  

Reason(s) for Decision:

Following an assessment of the floor plans for the proposed new hotel development at Charing Cross, St Helier, it was noted that the capacity of the proposed dining accommodation would have to be increased to meet the requirements of the Tourism (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 1990, ‘the Order’.

 

The indicated capacity of the dining accommodation falls below the requirement of the Order. This requirement stipulates that the dining accommodation must be furnished with sufficient separate tables for the efficient service of meals at one sitting to the total number of resident guests that can be accommodated on the premises, or where meals are served over a period of at least one hour, 75% of that number. 

 

It is felt that the requirement to demand seating capacities to accommodate all resident guests at one sitting should be amended. It is envisaged that this amendment would remove any delays with the proposed new development but also give existing establishments the opportunity to be more flexible with dining accommodation as these areas could be used in a more practical manner. Whilst removing this requirement would give establishments more flexibility and a better use of space it is not intended to remove the requirement for a dining room all together. This change has also highlights the need to review the Tourism Law and Order to identify possible unnecessary regulation.

 

Resource Implications:

There are no resource implications to the States.

Action required:

Hospitality and Leisure Manager to draw up the necessary law drafting instructions for Ministerial   approval and subsequent submission to the Law Draftsman.

Signature:  Connetable S.W.Pallett

Position:  Assistant Minister  

 

 

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Back to top
rating button