Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Transfer of funds associated with investigations undertaken by Wiltshire Constabulary and court case costs

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 2 December 2009 regarding: Transfer of funds associated with investigations undertaken by Wiltshire Constabulary and court case costs.

Decision Reference: MD-HA-2009-0108

Decision Summary Title:

Transfer of Funds  to the Home Affairs Department

Date of Decision Summary:

26 November 2009

Decision Summary Author:

Finance Director

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Transfer of Funds from the Economic Development and Social Security Departments to the Home Affairs Department

Date of Written Report:

25 November 2009

Written Report Author:

Finance Director

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Transfer of funds from the Economic Development and Social Security Departments to the Home Affairs Department to help address overspends within the Home Affairs Department as a result of investigations currently undertaken by the Wiltshire Constabulary and Court and Case Costs.

Decision(s): The Minister decided to accept a transfer of funds of £185,000 from the Economic Development Department and £606,000 from the Social Security Department.

Reason(s) for Decision: The Home Affairs Department Quarterly Financial Report (as at 30 September 2009) forecast a year end overspend of £1,410,000 on Court and Case Costs and £718,000 on investigations currently undertaken by the Wiltshire Constabulary. 

At its meeting on 12 November 2009 the Council of Ministers considered the consolidated quarterly financial report of all States funded bodies for the period ending 30th September 2009 and agreed that sums equivalent to the anticipated underspends of the Economic Development and Social Security Departments for 2009 would be made available to help address overspends elsewhere. 

The Council noted that after the above transfers further funds would need to be transferred to address the residual shortfall on the Court and Case Costs budget.

Resource Implications: As above

Action required:  The Minister to seek the approval of the Minister for Treasury and Resources in accordance with Financial Direction 3.6 – Variations to Heads of Expenditure.

Signature: 

Position:

Minister for Home Affairs

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Back to top
rating button