Government of Jersey

Propositions tabled by Deputy Jeremy Macon (FOI)

Produced by the Freedom of Information office
Authored by Government of Jersey on behalf of the States Greffe and published on 13 November 2017.
Prepared internally, no external costs.

Request

Since entering the States on 8 December 2008 I would like to know how many propositions Deputy Jeremy Martin Maçon has tabled and actually won or lost?

I would also like to know how many times this Deputy has applied for any Ministerial Position within the Council of Ministers since 8 December 2008 that have subsequently been rejected by the Assembly?

Response

Lodged Propositions

According to research we have undertaken, Deputy J.M. Maçon has lodged three propositions in his own name since he was elected in 2008. One proposition was adopted, one proposition was rejected and one proposition was withdrawn before debate by the States Assembly. Details of the propositions are listed in the table below. Further information can be obtained by conducting a search for individual propositions at the link below:

Propositions

Year	Proposition	Status
2010	P.102/2010 Le Clos Gosset: upgrade of heating system – petition	Withdrawn
2011	P.42/2011 Public Elections: extension of pre-poll voting arrangements	Adopted
2013	P.39/2013 Referendum on States reform: minimum turnout threshold	Rejected

Lodged Amendments
According to our research, in addition to the above propositions, Deputy Maçon has also lodged six amendments to propositions lodged by other States members or bodies of which one was adopted and five were rejected by the States Assembly.

Ministerial Positions

According to our research, Deputy Maçon has not been nominated for a ministerial position since his election in 2008.

This response has been issued on behalf of the States Greffe. The States Greffe is responsible for the information held by (and on behalf of) both itself and the States Assembly. Neither the States Assembly nor the States Greffe form part of the Government of Jersey and the Government was not involved either in the examination and retrieval of any information required for this response, nor in the drafting of the response itself.