Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

La Retraite Dairy Farm, St. Saviour. Request for reconsideration of refusal

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 27 November 2009 regarding: La Retraite Dairy Farm, St. Saviour. Request for reconsideration of refusal.

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2009 -0132

Application Number:  P/2008/1239

(If applicable)

Decision Summary Title :

La Retraite Dairy Farm, La Rue de la Retraite, St. Saviour

Date of Decision Summary:

19/10/09

Decision Summary Author:

Kelly Johnson

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Request for Reconsideration Report

Date of Written Report:

27/2/09

Written Report Author:

Kelly Johnson

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  La Retraite Dairy Farm, La Rue de la Retraite, St. Saviour 

Change of use to works depot. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION of refusal of planning permission.

Decision(s): 

At the Ministerial Meeting of 13th March 2009, the Minister considered a request for reconsideration of a refused decision for the change of use as a works depot at La Retraite Dairy Farm, La Rue de la Retraite, St. Saviour.  

The Minister recognised the economic implications and situation raised by the agent and applicant. The Minister’s predisposition at the Ministerial Meeting was to identify a means by which the existing use could be regularised however he did indicate that it would not be possible to determine the application at that time. The Minister decided to defer his decision pending a site visit.  

The Minister visited the site on 21st July 2009, accompanied by the Planning Applications Panel Chairman and officers from the Department. Only after visiting the site was the Minister able to make an appraisal of the impact of a works depot and its appropriateness in a countryside location.   

In light of all the evidence and material considerations, the Minister decided that the works depot, even with conditions imposed, was an inappropriate use for the location and therefore decided to maintain the refused decision. 

The Minister remains, however, sympathetic to the economic situation of the applicant and of the occupying company who is providing work for Islanders during an economic recession. In light of these considerations, the Minister will not take immediate enforcement action against the unauthorised use and will give the applicant 2 years to return the site to the approved dry storage use.

Reason(s) for Decision:

  1. The proposed development is an inappropriate use in the countryside, contrary to Policy C6 of the Island Plan 2002, which presumes against all forms of development for whatever purpose.

 

  1. The proposed development, by virtue of visual intrusion through the outside storage of materials, waste and vehicles and the number of vehicle movements per week, is harmful to the character of the countryside and contrary to Policy C6 and C19 of the Island Plan 2002.

 

  1. The proposed development does not provide adequate drainage facilities for surface water run-off contrary to Policy G2 and C19 of the Island Plan 2002.

Resource Implications:

None

Action required:

Notify Agent, Applicant and all other interested parties

Signature:

PLeg / PT Initials

Position:

Minister for Planning and Environment

Date Signed:

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

Back to top
rating button