Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Loss of reciprocal health agreement - transfer of funds from Treasury and Resources to Health and Social Services

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 18 January 2010 regarding: Loss of reciprocal health agreement - transfer of funds from Treasury and Resources to Health and Social Services.

Decision Reference:       MD-HSS-2010-0006

Decision Summary Title :

Reciprocal Health

Date of Decision Summary:

14h January 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Director of Finance & Information Services

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Loss of Reciprocal Health Agreement Income

Date of Written Report:

14th January 2010

Written Report Author:

Director of Finance & Information Services

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:

Loss of Reciprocal Health Income

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the transfer of £861,360 non-recurrently in 2009 to Health and Social Services to fund the removal of the Reciprocal Health Agreement income by the UK Department of Health with effect from 1st April 2009.

Reason(s) for Decision:

Funding is required to reimburse Health and Social Services for the removal of the Reciprocal Health Agreement income by the UK Department of Health for period October to December 2009.

Resource Implications:

Recurrent funding for this has been adjusted for in the 2010 cash limit.

Action required:

Request the Minister of Treasury and Resources to action this transfer as a non contentious transfer of funds from Treasury and Resources to Health and Social Services.

Signature: 

Position:

Minister for Health and Social Services

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Loss of reciprocal health agreement - transfer of funds from Treasury and Resources to Health and Social Services

HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES  

Summary Report re: Loss of Reciprocal Health Agreement Income  

The following analysis shows the income that has not been generated in the 4th quarter of 2009 as a result of the removal of the Reciprocal Health Agreement income by the UK Department of Health from 1st April 2009. 

Details

Period          Apr to Sep 2009

Period          Oct to Dec 2009

Total         Claim         2009

 

£

£

£

 

 

 

 

Income not received from DoH

1,950,000

975,000

2,925,000

Recurrent HSS income budget set for overseas visitors

15,100

7,550

22,650

Actual income received from  overseas visitors (less bad debts written off)

(248,070)

(132,210)

(380,280)

Cost of additional staff taken on to identify treatment costs and raise invoices for overseas visitors

20,150

11,020

31,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

1,737,180

861,360

2,598,540

 

As per the funding agreement the Accounting Officer confirms the following: 

  • The claim is necessary
  • That this loss of income can not be met from existing resources
  • That all possible measures (within current systems) had been taken to secure payment by visitors from the UK and their insurers.

 

Recovery of Overseas Patient Income 

Systems have been developed in H&SS that identify patients as UK/overseas visitors at the earliest opportunity, usually upon admission depending on the patient condition.  Once identified, they are met and interviewed by the Overseas Patients Officer who attempts to discover the exact circumstances and status of the patient.  During this initial discussion the Overseas Patients Officer explains how Jersey is not part of the UK NHS system and informs them of the likely costs that will be incurred.   

An important part of this discussion is that the Overseas Patients Officer attempts to obtain a consent signature that confirms they have had the situation explained to them and hence they are aware of the potential charges.   

At this point it is usually identified if the patient has appropriate insurance.  If they do then the Overseas Patients Officer liaises with the insurance company to confirm the level of cover and to gain the agreement that charges will be met.  Alternatively, if the patient is not insured for the specific circumstances or is not insured at all, then the patient is informed they are liable.  

This can be a highly emotive interview and is always approached with tact and respect for the patient’s condition.  Important to clarify is that no patient is ever refused essential emergency treatment, but it is made clear that if the patient is uninsured they are liable, regardless of their status or ability to pay. 

Once the patient episode is completed then the costs are fully identified and forwarded to the insurance company for payment.  For uninsured patients an invoice is issued to them personally.   

After an appropriate time period and after reminder letters have been issued etc., if the debt remains outstanding a UK debt collection agency is used to attempt to recover the outstanding income. 

 

Back to top
rating button