Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Medium Term Financial Plan 2013 - 2015 (P.69/2012): Ninth Amendment (P.69/2012 Amd. (9)) - Amendment (P.69/2012 Amd. (9) Amd.) - Amendment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 2 November 2012:

Decision Reference:  MD-C-2012-0111

Decision Summary Title :

Amendment to the amendment to P.69/2012 – Medium Term Financial Plan

Date of Decision Summary:

2nd November 2012

Decision Summary Author:

Project and Research Officer

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 N/A

Written Report

Title :

Medium Term Financial Plan 2013 – 2015 (P.69/2012): Ninth Amendment (P.69/2012 Amd.(9)) – Amendment (P.69/2012 Amd. (9) Amd.) – Amendment

Date of Written Report:

2nd November 2012

Written Report Author:

Chief Minister

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:  Amendment to the amendment to the ninth amendment to P.69/2012 – Medium Term Financial Plan.

Decision(s): The Chief Minister approved an amendment the amendment to the ninth amendment to P.69/2012 - Medium Term Financial Plan to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for debate.

Reason(s) for Decision: To enable the Minister’s amendment to the amendment to the ninth amendment to P.69/2012 - Medium Term Financial Plan to be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for debate by the States.

 

This amendment to an amendment is being proposed by the Chief Minister less than 7 days before the start of the debate in accordance with the provisions of Standing Order 80A(1)(a) which states –

 

(1) Notwithstanding standing order 26, the Chief Minister or Minister for Treasury and Resources may propose, without notice 

 

(a) an amendment to a draft medium term financial plan;

 

Standing Order 80A(2)(b) provides that an amendment of this nature shall be debated “either forthwith or at such other time or on such other day as the States decide”.

 

In accordance with the provisions of Standing Order 80A(2)(b) the Chief Minister will seek the agreement of the States to debate this amendment during the debate on the Medium Term Financial Plan 2013 - 2015.

 

Resource Implications:  The financial implications of the proposed amendment are neutral. There are no manpower implications.

Action required: The Greffier of the States is asked to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Amendment to the amendment to the ninth amendment to P.69/2012 – Medium Term Financial Plan, in time for the scheduled debate of the Medium Term Financial Plan on 6th November 2012

Signature:

 

Position: 

 

Senator I.J. Gorst, Chief Minister

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Medium Term Financial Plan 2013 - 2015 (P.69/2012): Ninth Amendment (P.69/2012 Amd. (9)) - Amendment (P.69/2012 Amd. (9) Amd.) - Amendment

MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN 2013  2015 (P.69/2012): NINTH AMENDMENT (P.69/2012 Amd.(9)) – AMENDMENT (P.69/2012 Amd.(9) Amd.) - AMENDMENT

 

1 PAGE 2, AMENDMENT 1 

In the table in the amendment to the amendment delete the sum “£2,000,000” in the substituted table in the column headed “2015” in the line “Transport and Technical Services”.

2 PAGE 2, AMENDMENT 2 

In the amendment to the amendment for the amount “£3,460,000” substitute the amount “£1,460,000”.

 

 

 

CHIEF MINISTER

 

Note. This amendment to an amendment is being proposed by the Chief Minister less than 7 days before the start of the debate in accordance with the provisions of Standing Order 80A(1)(a) which states –

 

(1) Notwithstanding standing order 26, the Chief Minister or Minister for Treasury and Resources may propose, without notice 

 

(a) an amendment to a draft medium term financial plan;

 

Standing Order 80A(2)(b) provides that an amendment of this nature shall be debated “either forthwith or at such other time or on such other day as the States decide”.

 

In accordance with the provisions of Standing Order 80A(2)(b) the Chief Minister will seek the agreement of the States to debate this amendment during the debate on the Medium Term Financial Plan 2013 - 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report

 

The Council of Ministers has proposed an amendment to the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel Amendment 9 (Parts 1 and 2). This would reduce the amount of growth being held centrally from the proposed £5,690,000 in 2013 and £7,730,000 in 2014 to the following:

 

Ministerial Departments

2014
£’000

2015
£’000

 

Chief Minister

410

410

 

Home Affairs

50

50

 

Social Security

750

1,000

 

Transport and Technical Services

1,000

2,000

 

 

Since the Council of Ministers lodged their amendment, further information has been received from Transport and Technical Services regarding the impact of holding the £2 million centrally for 2015. Having the flexibility of funding agreed for 2015 will allow Transport and Technical Services to begin contract negotiations for disposal/recycling solutions without being limited to one year. This will give long term supply chain benefits and will allow work to begin on a more environmentally sustainable solution. This is because this work requires a long term contract to allow third party capital investment.

 

The Chief Minister, therefore, is proposing an amendment to the Council of Ministers amendment to the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel Amendment 9 (Parts 1 and 2). This would revise the centrally held growth allocations to the departmental totals set out in the following table:

 

Ministerial Departments

2014
£’000

2015
£’000

Chief Minister

410

410

Home Affairs

50

50

Social Security

750

1,000

Transport and Technical Services

1,000

0

 

 

The total amounts held centrally for growth will be £2,210,000 for 2014 and £1,460,000 for 2015.

 

 

Financial and Manpower implications

 

The financial implications of the proposed amendment are neutral. There are no manpower implications.

Back to top
rating button