Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Refusal of request for reconsideration for planning permission for 71 Great Union Road, St. Helier

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (08.09.08) to maintain refusal for planning permission to demolish rear extension and construct new extension for 71 Great Union Road, St. Helier

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2008 - 0199

Application Number:  P/2007/2903

(If applicable)

Decision Summary Title :

71, Great Union Road, St. Helier

Date of Decision Summary:

4/9/08

Decision Summary Author:

 

Kelly Johnson

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

Kelly Johnson

Written Report

Title :

Request for Reconsideration Report

Date of Written Report:

23/6/08

Written Report Author:

Kelly Johnson

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  71, Great Union Road, St. Helier

 

Demolish rear extension and construct new extension.  Convert building into 1 No. dwelling. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION of refusal of planning permission.

 

Decision(s):

The Minister decided to Maintain Refusal of Planning Permission

 

The Minister considered the application at the Ministerial Meeting of 4 July 2008 and decided to defer the application pending further information regarding the demolition of the rear extension and front wall.

 

The Minister met with the agent on 2 September and heard further representation regarding the current state of the building. The Minister at this meeting made his decision to Maintain the Refusal of Planning Permission however also invited the agent to make an application for the extensive refurbishment of the property into one dwelling including the demolition of the rear extension and front wall and rebuilding in exact detail the front facade.

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Minister decided to maintain the refusal because the proposed development would result in the unacceptable (partial) demolition of a registered building and that insufficient information had been submitted to demonstrate that the proposed works would not be harmful to the special interest of the registered building, contrary to Policy HB13/ HB14, 1998 and G13 of the Island Plan 2002.

 

Resource Implications: None

 

Action required:

 

Notify Agent, Applicant and all other interested parties

 

Signature:

 

PLeg / PT Initials

Position:

Minister for Planning and Environment

 

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button