Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Income Tax (Amendment No.44) (Jersey) Law 201-: Lodging

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 17 July 2014:

Decision Reference: MD-TR-2014-0077

Decision Summary Title:

2015 Budget – Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Decision Summary:

15 July 2014

Decision Summary Author:

Director of Tax Policy

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

2015 Budget – lodging of Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201-

Date of Written Report:

15 July 2014

Written Report Author:

Director of Tax Policy

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:

2015 Budget – Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201-

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201-to be lodged “au Greffe” on Friday 18 July 2014.

 

The Minister further decided to lodge a draft Act of Declaration so that the Legislation may have immediate effect.

Reason(s) for Decision:

The proposed changes to the tax rules relating to pensions and pension schemes are to be lodged was part of the 2015 Budget.

Resource Implications:

There are no financial or manpower implications associated with proposed changes outlined in Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201-.

Action required:

The Greffier of the States is requested to lodge “au Greffe” the Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201-, as attached to this decision, on Friday 18 July 2014 with a request for debate on 22 September 2014.

Signature:

 

 

 

 

Position: Senator  P F C Ozouf, Minister for Treasury and Resources

 

                 

 

Date Signed:

Date of Decision:

 

Income Tax (Amendment No.44) (Jersey) Law 201-: Lodging

 - 1 -

Treasury and Resources

Ministerial Decision Report

 

 

 

Budget 2015 – lodging of Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201-

 

  1.               Purpose of Report

The purpose of this report is to obtain the permission of the Treasury and Resources Minister to lodge Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201- “au Greffe”.

 

  1.               Background

Alongside the 2014 Budget a consultation document was issued regarding proposed changes to the tax rules relating to pensions and pension schemes.  The changes outlined in the consultation document sought to achieve the following aims:

  • simplification of the tax rules;
  • modernisation of the tax rules – including, in particular, the introduction of flexible retirement in the context of occupational pension schemes; and
  • achieving greater consistency between the tax rules applying to occupational pension schemes and personal pension schemes, and between the tax rules applying to different forms of personal pension schemes, such that the tax incentives to transfer funds between pension schemes are minimised

The overwhelming majority of respondents to the consultation were supportive of the general aims of modernisation and simplification, but they also challenged the initial proposals and identified different options.  Having reviewed the consultation responses, a Report was presented to the States on 22 May 2014 which summarised the consultation responses and outlined the changes that would be made to the initial proposals.  The key changes to the initial proposals outlined in that Report were:

  • allowing pension schemes greater flexibility over the payment of tax-free lump sums;
  • allowing individuals to access the flexibility of approved drawdown contracts irrespective of whether they have already take a tax-free lump sum from their pension scheme; and
  • removal of the proposed caps on tax-free lump sum payments

The 2015 Budget contains the amendment to the Income Tax Law necessary to introduce the new tax rules.

 

  1.               Proposal

Income Tax (Amendment No. 44) (Jersey) Law 201- rewrites Part 19 of the Income Tax (Jersey) Law 1961 to create a modern and flexible set of tax rules for pensions and pension schemes.  The main changes proposed to the existing tax rules are outlined below:

  • members of occupational pension schemes will no longer be required to retire before being able to draw a pension from their pension scheme;
  • occupational pension schemes with members in Jersey and one or more other jurisdictions will be able to seek approval in Jersey for just the part of the scheme relating to the Jersey based members;
  • Retirement Annuity Trust Schemes (“RATS”) will be renamed as Retirement Trust Schemes;
  • non-residents individuals will be allowed to contribute into Retirement Trust Schemes;
  • pension schemes will be able to allow a person suffering from serious ill health to commute their pension fund at any time;
  • pension schemes will have much more flexibility over how they choose to pay out the 30% tax free lump sum available from approved Jersey schemes;
  • where a lump sum payment from an approved Jersey scheme is taxable (e.g. a lump sum paid following the death of the pension holder where the pension holder had already commencement benefits) it will be taxable at the rate of 10%, deducted by the scheme manager from the lump sum before it is paid;
  • a much wider range of international pension fund transfers, both to and from Jersey, will be permitted;
  • individuals will be able to access the flexibility of drawdown contracts where they have already taken a tax free lump sum from their pension scheme; and
  • the introduction of a potential benefit-in-kind for pension contributions made in the context of owner managers

 

  1.               Reason for Decision

With Jersey’s aging demographic, it is vitally important that the tax rules applying to pensions and pension schemes are fit for purpose.  However it has become apparent that our tax rules have not kept pace with modern society and are now lagging behind those applied in comparable jurisdictions.  In particular the existing rules can force individuals into making an all-or-nothing decision between continuing in employment and retirement; whereas the tax rules should not discourage individuals from remaining in the workforce for longer periods of time.

Furthermore the existing tax rules that apply to pension schemes are lengthy, complex and difficult to understand; they should be simplified and consolidated so that they are easier to understand.  Greater understanding should encourage more people to make sufficient savings for their retirement.

 

  1.               Resource Implications

Financial: it is anticipated that the proposed rule changes should have no financial implications.

Staffing: no implications.

 

 

Report author : Deputy Director of Tax Policy

Document date : 16/07/2014

Quality Assurance / Review : Business Manager

File name and path: L:\Treasury\Sections\Corporate Finance\Ministerial Decisions\DSs, WRs and SDs\2014-0077 - Income Tax Amendment No.44\WR - lodging Income Tax Amendment No.44 (16-07-14).docx

 

 

Back to top
rating button