Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Housing Development Fund Cost Benefit Analysis (P61/2010): Amendment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 17 June 2010 to lodge an amendment to P61/2010 (Housing Development Fund Cost Benefit Analysis)

Decision Reference:  MD-TR-2010-0096

Decision Summary Title:

P61/2010 Housing Development Fund Cost Benefit Analysis Amendment

Date of Decision Summary:

16 June 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Deputy Treasurer

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

P61/2010 Amendment

Date of Written Report:

16 June 2010

Written Report Author:

Deputy Treasurer

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:

P61/2010 Housing Development Fund Cost Benefit Analysis Amendment

Decision(s):

The Minister decided to lodge the attached amendment to P61/2010 Housing Development Fund Cost Benefit Analysis

Reason(s) for decision:

To amend P61/2010 – Housing Development Fund: Cost Benefit Analysis

Resource Implications:

Financial and manpower Implications are as detailed in the report.

Action required:

The Greffier of the States to be requested to arrange for the attached amendment to be lodged as soon as possible.

Signature: 
 

Position: Senator P. F.C. Ozouf, Minister for Treasury and Resources

Date Signed:

Date of Decision:

Housing Development Fund Cost Benefit Analysis (P61/2010): Amendment

P61/2010 Amendment  

Page 2- 

After the words “present to the States within” replace “3 months” with “6 months”. 
 
 
 
 

Report  

The Minister for Treasury and Resources agrees that a review of the Housing Development Fund would be helpful, particularly in light of issues facing the Housing Department in the future.  In order to integrate this review into the other issues being considered by departments and prioritise the workload involved, the Minister proposes a 6 month timescale as opposed to 3 months. 

The Housing Department is currently considering how it could achieve Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) savings of 10% by 2013.  The Minister for Housing is also considering the recommendations contained within the “Review of Social Housing in

Jersey” report published in 2009. 

Working with the new Minister for Housing the Treasury is reviewing the States medium to long term finances and funding arrangements, which include the Housing Development Fund and the possible establishment of a more independent housing entity. 

A review of the Housing Development Fund, its financials, and on-going obligations is an integral element of the work currently underway.  A six month timescale will enable this piece of work to be prioritised appropriately, integrated into the other pieces of work currently underway and completed ‘in house’ without incurring additional costs as suggested in the report accompanying P61/2010. 

 

Back to top
rating button