Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Mental Health Tribunal: Review of Scale Fees.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (15/02/2008) regarding: Mental Health Tribunal: Review of Scale Fees.

Decision Reference:        MD-HSS-2008-0005

Decision Summary Title :

Mental Health Tribunal: Review of Scale Fees

Date of Decision Summary:

January 9th 2008

Decision Summary Author:

R Pearson – Director of Finance & Information

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

Mental Health Tribunal: Review of Scale Fees

Date of Written Report:

January 9th 2008

Written Report Author:

G. Esnouf

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:

Increase in fees paid to members of the Mental Health Review Tribunal

Decision(s):

The Minister approved an Order increasing the fees payable to members of the Mental Health Review Tribunal as on the attached report.

Reason(s) for Decision:

The current fees have not been increased since 2002 and the proposal is to increase these approximately in line with the increase in the movement in the Jersey Cost of Living Index over the five year period.

Resource Implications:

Approximately £630 per annum based upon an average of seven Sittings a year.

Action required:

The Order requires publication by the States.

Signature:

Senator Ben Shenton

Position:

Minister for Health and Social Services

Date Signed:

15 February 2008

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Mental Health Tribunal: Review of Scale Fees.

HEALTH AND SOCIL SERVICES DEPARTMENT

MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW TRIBUNAL: REVIEW OF SCALE OF FEES  

  1. CURRENT FEES

The current fees payable for members of the Mental Health Tribunal are set out in R & O. 8/2002 and have been effective since 1st January, 2002: 

Type of Member

Initial Hearing

Resumed Hearing

 

 

 

Legal

£200

£60

Medical

£170

£60

Lay

£60

£60

 

  1. REQUIREMENT FOR A REVIEW

When the fees were last fixed by the then Health & Social Services Committee ,in its Act B5 of 7th December, 2001, the Committee decided that the fees should be reviewed again towards the end of 2006 to coincide with the appointment of new Tribunal members from 1st January, 2007. 

  1. COST OF LIVING INCREASE APPLIED TO PRESENT FEES PAYABLE

The Jersey Cost of Living Index increased by 20.69% over the five year period from September 2001 to September 2006.  If the 20.69% increase over the last five year period were applied to the present fees payable from 1st January, 2007, these would be increased as follows: 

Legal Member – increased by £41.38 to £241.38

Medical Member – increased by £35.17 to £205.17

Lay Member – increased by £12.41 to £72.41

Resumed Hearing – increased by £12.41 to £72.41

 

  1. RECCOMENDATIONS

The Chairman of the Mental Health Tribunal has proposed that the fees be increased as shown below following from 1st January, 2007: 

Legal Member – increased to £240

Medical Member – increased to £205

Lay Member – increased to £75

Resumed Hearing – increased to £75

 

Implementation of these increases will require the Minister to approve an order as follows: 

THE HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES MINISTER, in pursuance of Article 2 of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 1969, as amended, has made the following Order –

1. In Article 2 of the Mental Health (Review Tribunal) (Members Fees) (Jersey) Order 1973, as amended -

(a) for the words “who attends a sitting” there shall be substituted the words “who attends a sitting on or after 1st January 2007”;

(b) in sub-paragraph (a)(i) for the expression “£200” there shall be substituted the expression “£240”;

(c) in sub-paragraph (a)(ii) for the expression “£170” there shall be substituted the expression “£205”;

(d) in sub-paragraph (a)(iii) for the expression “£60” there shall be substituted the expression “£75”;

(e) in sub-paragraph (b) for the expression “£60” there shall be substituted the expression “£75”.

2. The Mental Health (Review Tribunal) (Members Fees) (Amendment No. 3) (Jersey) Order 2002 is revoked. 

Previous reviews were undertaken every five years. It is recommended that these fees should be reviewed again from 1st January, 2009 to ensure that they remain in line with other fees which are reviewed on a more regular basis. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

G.G. ESNOUF

9th.January 2008

 

Back to top
rating button