Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Comptroller and Auditor General Report on Financial Directions (R.121/2014): Response of the Minister for Treasury and Resources

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 13 October 2014:

Decision Reference:  MD-TR-2014-0117

Decision Summary Title:

Minister’s response to the Comptroller and Auditor General Report on Financial Directions (R.121/2014)

Date of Decision Summary:

7th October 2014

Decision Summary Author:

Interim Treasurer of the States

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title:

Minister’s response to the Comptroller and Auditor General Report on Financial Directions (R.121/2014)

Date of Written Report:

7th October 2014

Written Report Author:

Interim Treasurer of the States

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:

Minister’s response to the Comptroller and Auditor General Report on Financial Directions (R.121/2014).

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the response to the Comptroller and Auditor General Report on Financial Directions (R.121/2014) and requested that it be presented to the States.

Reason(s) for Decision:

The Minister wishes to ensure that all States Members are able to have access to his response to the Comptroller and Auditor General Report on Financial Directions (R.121/2014).

Resource Implications:

There are no financial or manpower implications as a direct result of this decision.

Action required:

Business Manager to request the Greffier of the States to arrange for the attached response to the Comptroller and Auditor General Report on Financial Directions (R.121/2014) to be presented to the States at the earliest opportunity.

Signature:

 

 

 

 

Position: Deputy E J Noel, Assistant Minister for Treasury and Resources

 

 

Date Signed:

Date of Decision:

 

Comptroller and Auditor General Report on Financial Directions (R.121/2014): Response of the Minister for Treasury and Resources

General Response:

 

The Treasury recognises the vital importance of an effective system of Financial Control, which is supported in the States through the issue of Financial Directions. The Treasury’s current project to review and update all Financial Directions, and issue new ones has made significant progress in developing a Financial Control Framework that supports robust financial control without causing unnecessary work for departments or the central function. However, we recognise that further work is required to embed Financial Directions within the culture of the States and welcomes the feedback provided by this report. The Treasury will look to incorporate the agreed recommendations of the report into its on-going work plan to further develop and strengthen existing procedures.

 


 

C&AG Recommendation

Response

Comment

R1 Following implementation of the detailed recommendations in this report, strengthen the States’ overall system of internal control by developing ‘Directions’ to cover other areas, such as information management and human resource management.

 

Agreed in principle

The scope of Finance Directions is specified by the Public Finances Law as the proper administration of that Law. However, the States also produces policies in the other key internal control areas mentioned.


HR Policies are issued by the HR department, and cover a range of Human Resource Management issues. It is proposed that a legislative change is taken to the States with the aim of replicating a similar process to that for FDs, whereby Codes of Practice would be introduced for core HR areas such as recruitment and training. These Codes would continue to be supported by policy documents.

 

IS policies are issued by the Information Services Department (ISD), and document how ISD manages the States Information Technology and Communications estate. They are used to ensure the States has a controlled environment upon which it can build applications and services for users.

 

R2 Review the mechanisms for engaging with departments to ensure that valuable insight into the practicality of existing and proposed Financial Directions is sought, demonstrably considered and, where appropriate, acted upon.

 

Agreed

The Treasury recognises that consultation with departments is vital to the successful implementation of Financial Directions and user feedback is a key mechanism to ensure that Directions produced are practical, and this is incorporated into the current programme.

 

An overall review of the current process for the production of Financial Directions will be carried out, including consideration of practice in other jurisdictions and sectors and the views of users. As part of this review, consultation and other engagement mechanisms will be considered.

 

R3 Review and amend the current standard format for Financial Directions to ensure that all Financial Directions contain:

  • a clear statement of the control risks being addressed;
  • a direct and accessible ‘house style’; and
  • a clear linkage of mandatory requirements to control risks.

 

Agreed

The format used for Financial Directions will be reviewed in line with the recommendation, and a plan to implement any changes in the format across the Financial Control Framework produced.

 

 

R4 Update quality assurance procedures for Financial Directions to ensure that revised corporate standards for drafting Financial Directions are complied with.

Agreed

An overall review of the current process for the production of Financial Directions will be carried out, including consideration of practice in other jurisdictions and sectors and the views of users.

 

As part of this review, the existing quality assurance procedures will be developed to ensure that Financial Directions are clear and unambiguous.

 

R5 Adopt an appropriate platform for Financial Directions, using readily available software, which facilitates effective updating, navigation, searching and cross referencing.

Agreed

Financial Directions are currently published on the States Intranet which is accessible to most States Employees.  They include cross-referencing as far as allowed by the format, including hyperlinks to related Financial Directions and other relevant documents.

 

The Treasury will continue to work with the Information Services Department to explore ways in which new solutions could be used to enhance the delivery of Financial Directions.

 

R6 Develop a communications and training plan to ensure that relevant staff are aware of the requirements of and changes to Financial Directions.

 

Agreed, current process to be further developed

The Treasury recognises the need to embed Financial Directions across the organisation, and the key role that effective training and communication will have in ensuring that this is the case. The Treasury already takes steps to communicate to key individuals such as Accounting Officers and Finance Directors, and places reliance on these individuals to put into place systems to communicate to their finance teams and operational staff.

 

On appointment, Accounting Officers sign a letter acknowledging their responsibilities, including those relating to Financial Directions. Accounting Officers, Finance Directors (through the Finance Advisory Board) and Finance Managers (through he Financial Management and Reporting Group) receive email notification of all new Directions, together with a summary of key control requirements (both new and changes to previous). Finance Managers attending the monthly meeting of FMRG also receive a verbal update on all new Financial Directions and ongoing work on the Framework.

 

In addition, delegates on the Modern Manager Programme (MMP) receive an overview of the Financial Direction Framework and associated assurance processes as part of the MMP Finance Module, and departments provide training to their budget holders on relevant Financial Directions.

 

However the Treasury recognises that there is more work to do in this area, and will seek ways in which to improve the communication to both finance and in particular non-finance staff.

R7 Include an explicit statement on compliance with Financial Directions in the Annual Governance Statement, linking issues of non-compliance to individual Financial Directions.

 

Agreed in Principle

The Annual Governance Statement in the published Financial Report and Accounts already includes a summary of the States of Jersey internal control environment and specific references to significant control weaknesses that have arisen during the year. These include those resulting from non-compliance with Financial Directions.  

 

The Annual Governance Statement also refers to the work of Internal Audit is in providing assurance on the financial controls and processes in the States.  

 

The Treasury will work with the C&AG to explore the reasons non-compliance identified in her review and decide on appropriate actions, including how to report any significant non-compliance with Financial Directions.

 

 

R8 Identify and implement systems-based controls now and in the future as systems are introduced or changed. The aim should be to automate controls where possible to assist in ensuring compliance with all Financial Directions efficiently.

Agreed

The Treasury recognises that system-based controls form an integral part of the overall system of financial control, and when drafting Financial Directions will continue to seek to reflect the systems in place where strong system controls exist.

 

 

R9 Undertake an annual review of Financial Directions following the preparation of the Annual Governance Statement to:

  • consider the coverage and content of Financial Directions;
  • balance the need to manage risk with the costs of compliance with Financial Directions; and
  • identify areas for corrective action.

 

 

Agreed, current practice to be developed

There is a detailed work plan for the development of the Financial Control Framework, which includes forward planning for the drafting of additional Financial Directions and the update and improvement of current Financial Directions (through a process of continuous improvement). This work plan will be reviewed in line with the recommendations of this report, and the outcomes of the planned review of the production of Financial Directions.

 

Feedback from the Public Accounts Committee, the Comptroller and Auditor General, Internal Audit and departments will be fed into this work plan in identifying the key areas on which to focus, adopting a risk-based approach.  Exemptions requests received and reported instances of non-compliance will also be assessed. A process by which departments can report non-compliance on an on-going basis is also currently being developed with Internal Audit allowing action to be taken on a continuing basis.

 

Internal Audit is currently undertaking a project to ensure management has taken action to carry out agreed audit recommendations. Once the project has been completed Internal Audit will present key themes on non-compliance to the Audit committee and Financial Advisory Board. These results will also be communicated to FACT to inform the ongoing work plan.

 

R10 Align requirements for record-keeping with mandatory requirements of Financial Directions so that it is possible to test compliance with all mandatory requirements of Financial Directions.

Agreed

How to align requirements for record-keeping to mandatory requirements will be considered as part of the review of the format of Financial Directions. This could include a general requirement to ensure that adequate documentation is retained to demonstrate compliance with Financial Directions in the planned Accountabilities Financial Direction. 

 

Whilst any particular documentation needed is referred to in a Direction, the Treasury would expect departments to exercise professional judgement in determining what level of evidence is appropriate. The Treasury is also mindful that more stringent requirements in this area could lead to an increased administrative burden on departments, and will seek to minimise this where possible.

 

R11 Minimise the volume of mandatory requirements when drafting Financial Directions.

 

Agreed

The Treasury accepts the principle of ensuring that mandatory requirements are clear and easy to understand, and that Mandatory Requirements and Guidance are clearly differentiated. Once the review of the format and drafting process is complete, existing directions will be assessed against the revised corporate standard.

 

R12 Clearly distinguish between mandatory requirements of Financial Directions and supporting guidance on implementation.

Agreed

The Treasury will review the format of the Financial Directions to ensure that Mandatory Requirements and Guidance are clearly differentiated, and the modified approached rolled out across Financial Directions as part of the updated work programme.

 

R13 Undertake a sense check of the practicality of all mandatory requirements of Financial Directions, including through engagement particularly of front line users, before Financial Directions are finalised.

 

Agreed, current process to be developed

An overall review of the current process for the production of Financial Directions will be carried out, including consideration of practice in other jurisdictions and sectors and the views of users.

 

As part of this review, consultation and quality assurance procedures will be developed to ensure that the requirements of Financial Directions are practical.

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button