Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Unfair dismissal qualifying period for employees working under short, fixed-term contracts: Employment Forum’s recommendation and Minister’s response

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 14 December 2015:

Decision Reference:  MD-S-2015-104

Decision Summary Title :

DS Two-thirds rule recommendation - Report to States

Date of Decision Summary:

14 December 2015

Decision Summary Author:

Policy Principal

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

WR Minister’s response to two-thirds rule recommendation

Date of Written Report:

14 December 2015

Written Report Author:

Policy Principal

Written Report:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: Short fixed-term contracts, unfair dismissal and the two-thirds rule – Report to the States

Decision(s): The Minister decided to present to the States the Employment Forum’s recommendation on short fixed-term contracts and the two-thirds rule, along with a record of her decision to accept that recommendation.

Reason(s) for Decision: The Minister directed the Employment Forum to consult on the unfair dismissal qualifying period for employees working under short fixed-term contracts, specifically on whether the ‘two-thirds rule’ should be removed from the Employment Law. Employees working under fixed-term contracts of 26 weeks or less qualify for protection against unfair dismissal after having served two-thirds of their contract and subject to having worked for at least 13 weeks. This means that an employee on a fixed-term contract of 26 weeks or less has the right to claim unfair dismissal much sooner than employees on other types of contracts. When the qualifying period for protection against unfair dismissal was increased from 26 weeks to 52 weeks on 1 January 2015, this inconsistency was exacerbated and so the Minister had directed the Forum to consult on the impact of removing the two-thirds rule. The Forum has consulted and presented its recommendation to the Minister, as required by Article 19 of the Employment Law, and the Minister has decided to lay a copy of that report before the States, along with a record of her decision to accept the recommendation.

Resource Implications: There are no financial or manpower implications.

 

Action required: Policy Principal to request the Greffier of the States to arrange for the Minister’s response (the written report) and the Forum’s recommendation (the supporting document) to be presented together as a Report to the States at the earliest opportunity (the Minister’s response to appear first). Policy Principal to arrange the media release and public circulation of the Forum’s recommendation on 15 December.

Signature:

 

 

Position:

 

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button