Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Maison Aleval, Rue du Petit Aleval, St. Peter - maintain refusal

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (26.07.07) to maintain refusal of planning permission for Maison Aleval, Rue du Aleval, St. Peter.

Subject:

Maison Aleval, La Rue de Petit Aleval, St. Peter, Jersey

Remove roofs to main house and east dower and replace with new pitched roofs to include dormers and roof lights.

Decision Reference:

MD-PE-2007-0157

Exempt clause(s):

n/a

Type of Report (oral or written):

Written

Person Giving Report (if oral):

n/a

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

n/a

Report

File ref:

P/2006/2778

Written Report

Title:

Request for Reconsideration of refusal of Planning Permission

Written report – Author:

Elizabeth Ashworth

Decision

The Minister maintained the decision to refuse consent for planning permission for the above application.

Reason for decision:

The proposal is contrary to Policy G13 of the Island Plan 2002.

Action required:

Advise agent and interested parties of the decision

Signature:

(Minister)

Date of Decision:

26.06.07

 

 

 

 

 

Maison Aleval, Rue du Petit Aleval, St. Peter - maintain refusal

Application Number: P/2006/2778

Request for Reconsideration Report

Site Address

Maison Aleval, La Rue de Petit Aleval, St. Peter.

 

 

Requested by

Mr. R WGreen

Agent

J S Livingston Architectural Services Ltd

 

 

Description

Remove roofs to main house and east dower and replace with new pitched roofs to include dormers and roof lights. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION of refusal of planning permission

 

 

Type

Planning

 

 

Original Decision

REFUSED

 

 

Conditions

 

Reasons

1. The proposed alterations are considered unsympathetic and detrimental to the character of this Building of Local Interest and are therefore contrary to Policy G 13 of the Island Plan 2002.

 

 

Determined by

Delegated Refused

 

 

Date

23/01/2007

 

 

Zones

Countryside Zone

Water Pollution Safeguard Area

Building Of Local Interest

 

 

Policies

G13

 

Recommendation

Maintain refusal

 

Comments on Case

The proposed raising of the roof in the manner shown in contrary to Policy G13. The Historic Buildings Officer in her report stated that the proposal pays no respect to the elegance and proportion of this house and produces a scheme which is wholly inappropriate to this protected building, contrary to Policy G13 (i) removal of roof (ii) extension which adversely affects architectural and historic interest and character (iii) dormers.

The Case Officer endorses this view and there are no grounds upon which to reverse the decision to refuse consent.

The quoted examples bear no relevance to this case.

 

 

Recommendation

Maintain refusal

 

 

Reasons

No grounds to change decision to refuse.

 

 

Background Papers

1:2500 Site Plan

Letter from agent

 

 

 

 

Endorsed by

 

Date

15 June 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to top
rating button