Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Comments on Draft Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200- (P.95/2008): amendment.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (14/07/2008) regarding: Comments on Draft Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200- (P.95/2008): amendment.

Decision Reference:  MD-T-2008-0061

Decision Summary Title :

Comments on Draft Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200- (P.95/2008):

amendment

Date of Decision Summary:

14th July 2008

Decision Summary Author:

John Richardson – Chief Officer

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

Comments on Draft Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200- (P.95/2008):

amendment

Date of Written Report:

14th July 2008

Written Report Author:

John Richardson – Chief Officer

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Comments on Draft Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 200- (P.95/2008): amendment

Decision(s):  The Minister approved the comments from the Department which outlined the reason why a two year period to move the Animal Carcass Incinerator as outlined by Deputy Gorst was not acceptable.

Reason(s) for Decision:  The two year period is insufficient time given the current uses at Bellozanne, the Liquid Waste Strategy and the Strategic Master planning exercise required for La Collette.

Resource Implications:  Additional consultancy costs if the project is to be accelerated.

Action required:  Formal comments to the Greffe for publication to States Members.

Signature: 

Position: 

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Back to top
rating button