Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 2008: Amendment: Law drafting instructions

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 8 October 2016:

Decision Reference: MD-PH-2016-0057

 

Decision Summary Title :

Howard Davis Farm, Trinity – “Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 2008” - Proposed Revisions and Instruction to the Law Draughtsman and the Law Officers’ Department

Date of Decision Summary:

06 October 2016

Decision Summary Author:

Principal Property Manager

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Howard Davis Farm, Trinity – “Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 2008” - Proposed Revisions and Instruction to the Law Draughtsman and the Law Officers’ Department

Date of Written Report:

06 October 2016

Written Report Author:

Principal Property Manager

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

 

Subject:   Howard Davis Farm, Trinity – “Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 2008” - Proposed Revisions and Instruction to the Law Draughtsman and the Law Officers’ Department

 (PBA 0840/0841/0845-01-001)

Decision(s):

 

The Minister decided, as recommended by Jersey Property Holdings, to instruct the Law Draftsman and the Law Officers’ Department to prepare a revised draft of the Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 2008”, to address:

 

a)     ‘Non-conforming’ land uses under the ‘principal’ and ‘ancillary’ land uses set-out in the Schedule of the Law

b)     The omission from the Law of two fields forming part of Howard Davis Farm – field n° 302 (also known as La Geonnière) and ‘Côtil at Egypt’

 

with a view to lodging ‘au Greffe’ the revised Law for debate by the States.

Reason(s) for Decision:

 

To draft certain revisions to the Law to seek to address ‘non-conforming’ land uses, and the omission from the Law of two fields, with a view to lodging ‘au Greffe’ the draft for debate by the States.

 

Resource Implications:

 

  1. There are no financial implications associated of this decision other than officer time and sundry disbursements.

 

  1.       There are no manpower implications in respect of this decision.

 

Action required:

 

  1. Jersey Property Holdings to issue an instruction to the Law Draftsman and the Law Officers’ Department to prepare a revised draft of the Howard Davis Farm (Abrogation of Covenant) (Jersey) Law 2008”.

 

  1. Upon receipt of the revised law, Jersey Property Holdings to arrange for the Minister to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Law for debate by the States.

 

Signature:

 

 

Position:

Deputy E J Noel

Minister for Infrastructure

        

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Back to top
rating button