Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme: Committee of Management: Membership: Employer Representative Appointment

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 31 August 2011:

Decision Reference:   MD-C-2011-0105

 

Decision Summary Title :

Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme Membership of the Committee of Management

Date of Decision Summary:

17th August 2011

Decision Summary Author:

Senior Human Resources Manager

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme Membership of the Committee of Management

Date of Written Report:

27th July 2011

Written Report Author:

Senior Human Resources Manager

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject:   Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme membership of the Committee of Management

Decision(s):   The Chief Minister agreed to recommend to the States Assembly the appointment of an Employer representative on the PECRS Committee of Management for the current term of office which ceases on 31st December 2012.

Reason(s) for Decision:   As a result of the resignation of Mr Rod Bryans from the Committee of Management, the Chief Minister has chosen to replace him with Mr Stuart Lusby.

Resource Implications: There are no financial or manpower implications.

Action required:  The Senior Human Resources Manager requests that the Report be lodged ‘au Greffe’ for consideration by the States Assembly at the earliest possible opportunity.

Signature:

 

 

Position:

 

Senator P.F.C. Ozouf, Deputy Chief Minister

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

Public Employees Contributory Retirement Scheme: Committee of Management: Membership: Employer Representative Appointment

 

PROPOSITION

 

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SCHEME

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT: MEMBERSHIP

 

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion -

 

in accordance with Regulation 3(5) of the Public Employees (Contributory Retirement Scheme) (General) (Jersey) Regulations 1989, as amended, to approve the appointment of Mr Stuart Alan Lusby, as an employer representative on the Committee of Management for the period ending 31st December 2012.

 

CHIEF MINISTER

SENATOR TERRY LE SUEUR

 

REPORT

 

The Regulations governing the Committee of Management of the Public Employees’ Contributory Retirement Scheme provide for the appointment of employer and employee representatives, who sit in an honorary capacity.

 

Of the seven employer representatives three are nominated by the Treasury and Resources Minister, the remainder by the Chief Minister.  With the resignation of Mr R G Bryans, the Chief Minister, in accordance with Regulation 3(5) of the Regulations has chosen Mr S A Lusby, to replace him for the term of office to expire on 31st December 2012.

 

The seven employee representatives are nominated by the Joint Negotiating Group of the Public Employees Pension Fund.

 

Please see appendix attached to this report for the relevant background of the nominee.

 

Membership remains the same for previously nominated employer and employee representatives but is included below for clarity.

 

Employer representatives    Employee representatives

Mr Mick Pinel      Mr Gary Birbeck

Mr Sachin Meeku Patidar    Mr John Lees

Mr John Rosser     Mr Mike Orbell

Mr Steven Warner     Mr Alan Tadier

Mr Scot Laing      Ms Barbara Ward

Mr John Mills      Ms Mark Johnson

       Mr Mark Richardson

 

Although the States agreed in principle on 2nd February 2010 to amend the procedure for appointments such as this one so that a debate would no longer be needed, that change requires amendments to the Public Employees (Contributory Retirement Scheme) (General) (Jersey) Regulations 1989 under which appointments to the Committee of Management are made. Those amendments are currently being drafted but until they are approved by the States it is necessary for the appointments to be made under the current procedures.

 

Financial and manpower implications

 

There are no financial or manpower implications for the States arising from this proposition.

 

 

Back to top
rating button