Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Committee of Inquiry : Planning issues surrounding the operation of Reg’s Skips Ltd.

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (06/04/2009) regarding: Committee of Inquiry : Planning issues surrounding the operation of Reg’s Skips Ltd.

Decision Ref:

MD-PE-2009-0068

Subject:

COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY : PLANNING ISSUES SURROUNDING THE OPERATION OF REG’S SKIPS LTD

Decision Summary Title :

DS – Reg’s Skips Committee of Inquiry

DS Author:

Andrew Scate, CEO Planning and Environment

DS Date:

3 April 2009

DS Status:

Public

Written Report Title :

PROPOSITION: COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY: REG’S SKIPS LTD. PLANNING APPLICATIONS.

WR Author:

Senator F E Cohen

WR Date

03/04/2009

WR Status:

Public

Oral Rapporteur:

 

Decision(s):

The Minister for Planning and Environment approved the report and proposition seeking to establish a Committee of Inquiry –

i) to establish whether the various planning applications were determined appropriately and to a standard expected of the Planning and Environment Department; and 

ii) to establish whether the legal fees accrued by Reg’s Skips Ltd totalling nearly £300,000 were as a result of any failings in the processes or actions of the Planning and Environment Department. 

Reason(s) for Decision:

Having reflected on various statements made during the course of the States debate of P.29/2009 (‘Ex Gratia Compensation Payment – Mr. and Mrs. Pinel’) that were critical of the Planning Department, the Minister considered that it was necessary to establish the facts of the matter.

Resource Implications:

A Committee of Inquiry is expected to cost no more than £15,000

Action required:

  1. To request the Greffier of the States to lodge the proposition forthwith and with a view to securing the earliest possible date for debate.

Signature:

 

Position:

Minister for Planning and Environment

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different to Date Signed):

 

Committee of Inquiry : Planning issues surrounding the operation of Reg’s Skips Ltd.

PROPOSITION  

COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY: REG’S SKIPS LTD. PLANNING APPLICATIONS.  

THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion –  

a) to agree that a Committee of Inquiry should be established in accordance with Standing Order 146 to inquire into a definite matter of public importance, namely to investigate all planning matters relating to the various relevant planning applications made by, or on behalf of, Reg’s Skips Ltd. in connection with the activities of the company as skip operators - 

i) to establish whether the various planning applications were determined appropriately and to a standard expected of the Planning and Environment Department; and 

ii) to establish whether the legal fees accrued by Reg’s Skips Ltd totalling nearly £300,000 were as a result of any failings in the processes or actions of the Planning and Environment Department. 

b) to request the Chief Minister to take the necessary steps to select a suitable Chairman and members to undertake the inquiry and to bring forward to the States for approval the necessary proposition relating to their appointment. 
 

MINISTER FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT 

Report  

During the recent States debate on the proposition lodged by Senator Shenton many statements were made by members criticising the Planning Department. The purpose of the Committee of Inquiry is to establish the accurate facts and to determine if the various planning applications made by Reg’s Skips were appropriately dealt with by the Planning Department. The Inquiry will also establish if the actions of the Planning Department were responsible for the legal bills totalling nearly £300,000 currently accrued by Reg’s Skips.  

It is essential that confidence is maintained in the Planning Department and this Inquiry will ensure that the facts are available to States members and the public. 

Financial and manpower implications  

The costs will depend upon the level of officer support required. A Committee of Inquiry normally requires the appointment or secondment of an officer on a part-time basis and I estimate that the total cost should not exceed £15,000. The Minister for Treasury and Resources is required, under Standing Order 150(c), to give directions on how the above expenses should be funded.

 

Back to top
rating button