Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Repeal of two orders made under the Weights and Measures (Jersey) Law 1967

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (09.08.06) to repeal two orders made under the Weights and Measures (Jersey) Law 1967

 

 

Subject:

Repeal of two Orders made under the Weights and Measures (Jersey) Law 1967

Decision Reference:

MD-E-2006-0135

Exempt clause(s):

 

Type of Report:

(oral or written)

Written

Person Giving Report (if oral):

 

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

n/a

Report

File ref:

 

Written report – Title

Repeal of two Orders made under the Weights and Measures (Jersey) Law 1967

Written report – Author

(name and job title)

Trevor Le Roux, Director – Consumer Affairs

Decision(s):

The Minister has approved the recommendation in the attached report.

Reason(s) for decision:

To remove outdated and unnecessary legislation as recommended in the “red tape” review.

Action required:

Trevor Le Roux to send appropriate instructions to the Law Draftsman.

Signature:

Senator Philip Ozouf

(Minister)

Date of Decision:

 

 

 

 

 

Repeal of two orders made under the Weights and Measures (Jersey) Law 1967

Minister For Economic Development

Repeal of two Orders made under the Weights and Measures ( Jersey ) Law 1967

1. The Issue

1.1. The “Red Tape” review of legislation which falls within the responsibility of the Economic Development Department made several recommendations, two of which referred to subordinate Weights and Measures legislation.

1.2. The two Orders referred to are the Weights and Measures (Person Weighing Machines) (Jersey) Order 1975 and the Weights and Measures (Ballast) (Jersey) Order 1968.

2. The Facts

2.1. The regulation of person weighing machines ceased in the UK some years ago which has made the Person Weighing Machines Order unenforceable. Therefore, it is appropriate that this redundant Order is revoked.

2.2. The Ballast Order makes provision for use for trade of cubic measures as a means of buying or selling ballast. It is known that all transactions for ballast in the island are carried out by reference to weight rather than volume. Therefore, the Ballast Order is no longer required.

3. Recommendation

3.1. It is recommended that the Minister authorises the Director, Consumer Affairs, to instruct the law draftsman to draft an appropriate revocation Order as soon as possible.

Trevor Le Roux

Director, Consumer Affairs & Trading Standards

Economic Development Department.

2nd August 2006.

 

Back to top
rating button