Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline Procedure) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 200-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (20.08.07) to approve the Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline Procedure (Amendment No. 2) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Subject:

Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline procedure) (Amendment No 2) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Decision Reference:

MD-HA-2007-0054

Exempt clause(s):

 

Type of Report (oral or written):

Oral

Person Giving Report (if oral):

Heidi Sydor

Executive Officer, Home Affairs

Telephone or

e-mail Meeting?

 

Report

File ref:

HAD/DPT 9

Written Report –

Title:

 

Written report – Author:

 

Decision(s):

The Minister approved the Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline procedure) (Amendment No 2) (Jersey) Regulations 200- and decided to lodge it ‘au Greffe’ for debate on October 23rd 2007.

Reason(s) for decision:

These Regulations amend the Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline Procedure) (Jersey) Regulations 2000 as a consequence of the Police (Complaints and Discipline) (Amendment) (Jersey) Law 200-. They will come into force on the same day as the Police (Complaints and Discipline) (Amendment) (Jersey) Law 200-.

Resource Implications:

There are no financial or manpower implications arising from this change.

Action required:

The Executive Officer, Home Affairs, to request the Greffier of the States to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Regulations at the earliest opportunity for debate on 23rd October 2007

Signature:

(Minister/ Assistant Minister)

Date of Decision:

 

 

 

 

 

Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline Procedure) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 200-

Report: Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline procedure) (Amendment No2) ( Jersey ) Regulations 200-

The purpose of these Regulations is to amend the Police (Honorary Police Complaints and Discipline Procedure) (Jersey) Regulations 2000 as a consequence of the Police (Complaints and Discipline) (Amendment) (Jersey) Law 2000, which deals with complaints against members of the Honorary Police.

Where the Attorney General is satisfied that the conduct complained of , even if proved, would not justify a criminal charge or disciplinary hearing, it would not be appropriate to require the States of Jersey Police to utilise valuable resources in investigating matters further.

The Law amendment removes the requirement in Article 21(5) for the Attorney General to direct the Connétable to request the Chief Officer to carry out an investigation where informal resolution of a complaint is impossible. This amendment brings the Regulations into line with the Law.

The provision whereby a Connétable must notify the Attorney General of the outcome of an attempt at informal resolution would be retained, thus providing a monitoring mechanism by which further steps may be taken if appropriate.

There is no requirement to inform the Police Complaints Authority in minor cases of complaints against members of the Honorary Police, and there is therefore no reason to require the Attorney General to notify the Authority where informal resolution has failed.

There are no financial or manpower implications arising from these Regulations.

The Regulations will come into force on the same day as the Police (Complaints and Discipline) (Amendment) (Jersey) Law 200-.

 

Back to top
rating button