Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Jersey Gas Site, Tunnell Street, St Helier: Planning Application

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 9 March 2015:

Decision Reference:   MD-PE-2015 -0017

Application Number:  PP/2014/1125

(If applicable)

Decision Summary Title :

Jersey Gas Co Site, Tunnell Street, St. Helier

Date of Decision Summary:

09 March 2015

Decision Summary Author:

 

Senior Planner

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Oral and Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

Senior Planner

Written Report

Title :

 Updated Department of the Environment Report for Ministerial Meeting

Date of Written Report:

23 January 2015

Written Report Author:

Senior Planner

 

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Jersey Gas Co Site, Tunnell Street, St. Helier, Jersey, JE2 4LU

 

OUTLINE APPLICATION: Demolition of existing gas works and associated office, showroom and staff accommodation. Construction of new residential development comprising 285 No.1, 2 and 3 bed dwellings and associated residential facilities, commercial units, semi-basement parking, ancillary areas, landscaping amenities and public realm improvements. All matters reserved excluding siting and massing. EIA submitted. 3D Digital Model Available.

 

Decision(s):

The planning application was first heard by the previous Minister for Planning and Environment in a Public Meeting on 25 September 2014. At this Ministerial Meeting the Minister received the first Department Report with a recommendation of approval and heard verbal representations for and against the application. At this meeting the application was deferred by the Minister for site visits to neighbouring properties and legal advice.

 

The planning application reverted back to a Ministerial Public Meeting on 06 February 2015 before the current Minister for Planning and Environment. At this Ministerial Meeting, the Minister received an Updated Department of the Environment Report dated 23 January 2015 and heard public comment in relation to the planning application. The Minister deferred his decision pending a site visit and to consider the application further expressing concerns regarding the public car parking provision amongst other matters.

 

Site visits to neighbouring properties (including viewing of the application site from the inside of the neighbouring properties) and the surrounding area were undertaken by the Minister and the Planning Case Officer on 10 February 2015.

 

Following the site visits the Minister expressed some concerns regarding the impact of the proposed development on neighbouring properties on Tunnell Street and regarding views and opening up of the gap between the Town Park and the public square in the development. The Minister then provided the applicant with the opportunity to reconsider the proposed scheme and consequently Planning Officers discussed amended plans with Jersey Gas and its architects in a series of meetings.

 

Subsequently amended plans were submitted by the Applicant on 27 February 2015 which changes the scheme to respond to the concerns expressed by objectors.

 

The changes included the following:

 

 The views between the Town Park and the main public square within the development have been opened up by doubling the size of the gap between the blocks facing the Town Park.

 

 The proposed apartment buildings on Tunnel Street have been set further back from the pavement (with additional landscaping) to increase the distance between the existing properties on the opposite side of Tunnell Street and the proposed development.

 

 The top floor of the proposed south/south-west block onto Tunnell Street has been removed and the floor below set back further from the main front elevation.

 

 The proposed development has been set back further from the roadside and reconfigured onto L’Avenue Et Dolmen du Pres des Lumieres and additional landscaping incorporated.

 

 The proposed apartment buildings on St Saviours Road have been set back further from the pavement with additional landscaping including trees to act as a buffer to the traffic.

 

The amended plans were available to view on the planning internet site and in the planning reception and letters were sent out to people who had made representations on the planning application informing them of the amended plans being submitted. Further letters of representation were subsequently received by the Department which the Minister duly considered in detail.

 

A further email consultation response from Transport and Technical Services was received on 06 March 2015 requesting that a commuted sum is proceeded with to provide public car parking elsewhere and not on site.

 

The Minister confirmed he has considered the amended plans and all representations received including letters received, representations at the public meeting and representations at the site visits as well as having seen the issues at first hand from certain neighbouring residential properties.

 

The application was received by the Department on 22 July 2014 and the Minister considers that due to this length of time since submission that the Applicant should quite rightly expect a decision and drawing out this situation further without a decision, is not good practice.

 

The decision therefore has to be one to approve or refuse the application as it currently stands.

 

Since the public Ministerial Meeting the officers have worked hard with the Applicant in an attempt to address the issues raised by the objectors and to address the reservations expressed by the Minister at that Ministerial Meeting.

 

The main issues that needed to be addressed in the Minister’s mind were parking, the potential overbearing effect of the proposals on the properties on Tunnell Street, the general massing of the proposals, the connectivity of the proposed scheme to the Town Park, and finally the density of the development. The Minister also considered this application strategically as one of four similar large schemes that will be constructed in this part of St Helier in the near future and considered it acceptable in this regard.

 

Taking each of these issues in turn:

 

Impact on Tunnell Street

 

The submitted architect plans with the application provide sections, floor plans and elevations as well as 3d visual plans showing the proposed development in its context. This is an outline planning application and thus the elevation design, landscaping and siting of balconies are to be considered at Reserved Matters stage. It is the scale and massing of the development that is being considered at this Outline stage.

 

Tunnell Street is a relatively narrow street with pavements to both sides with mainly commercial properties to the eastern part and largely 2 storey cottages to the western part opposite the application site. The proposed development would be predominantly 4 storeys in height onto Tunnell Street with semi-basement parking and the top floor set back further from the main elevation.

 

The North of St Helier Masterplan states that development across the application site should be predominantly 5.5 storeys and approximately 300 dwellings and will need to be sympathetic to the scale of neighbouring buildings.

 

The Development Brief for the Jersey Gas site states that there is considered potential for up to 6 storeys on the northern boundary and 4 storeys along the southern boundary of the site which should respect the existing street context.

 

Whilst it is acknowledged that there will be an impact from the proposed development on the neighbouring properties particularly in Tunnell Street, with the submission of the amended plans which set back the development further from the roadside and reduced the height and scale of the development onto Tunnell Street (by removing the top floor of the south-west/south block and setting back the floor below) and with the addition of Condition 22 on the Decision Notice setting back further (by a total of 4 m from the front face of the building) the top floor of Block C facing Tunnell Street, the Minister did not consider that the impact of the development would ‘unreasonably harm the amenities of neighbouring uses’ which is the test set by Policy GD1 of the 2011 Island Plan (as revised 2014).

 

Parking provision

 

The Minister considers it unacceptable that a commuted sum should be paid for public parking spaces that cannot be delivered. The idea of the commuted sum is to provide public parking. TTS have informed the Minister since the Ministerial Meeting that there is no obvious site for alternative public parking. Unless this situation changes, and TTS locate a site for additional public parking, it is clear to the Minister that the proposed level of public parking will have to be delivered on site. This public parking must be in addition to the provision for residents.

 

 The proposed parking level is for a total of 230 parking spaces, 30 of which would be public spaces. The calculation of 0.7 parking spaces per unit is a minimum level and should not be decreased. The final parking numbers and layout is to be considered at Reserved Matters stage, but it is considered that the proposed parking provision is acceptable given the site’s sustainable central location close to bus routes and the town centre.

 

Connectivity to the Town Park

 

The amended proposals for ‘connectivity’ to the Town Park give a much wider and easier access for the public to gain entry to the proposed public spaces within the development and to maximise views between the public square in the development and the Town Park. It is considered that the proposal in this respect is acceptable.

 

Massing and density of the development

 

The amended plans show the buildings set back from the pavement all around the development site particularly including St Saviour’s Road and Tunnell Street. The ability to screen the new buildings and provide a buffer to the road with natural foliage and trees will help the scheme and the set back is very much in keeping with the surrounding area.

The density is in line with the North of Town Masterplan and Development Brief for the site and with the amendments made it is considered that the density and massing is at an acceptable level.

 

In the context of all of the above, the Minister resolved to endorse the Department recommendation that the application be approved, subject to Planning Conditions as listed in the Decision Notice dated 09 March 2015 and the completion of the Planning Obligation Agreement to deliver a financial sum to provide a bus shelter in the vicinity of the site, a financial sum to the proposed cycle/pedestrian link from Tunnell Street to Belmont Road and to provide 30 public parking spaces in the semi-basement car park on the application site.

 

The decision is therefore to APPROVE

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

 

The reasoning behind the decision to approve the planning application is set out above and the Reason for Approval on the Decision Notice dated 09 March 2015 is as follows:

 

The proposed development is considered to be acceptable having due regard to the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (as revised 2014) and all of the other material considerations raised. In particular, the development has been assessed against Policies SP1, SP2, SP3, SP4, SP6, SP7, GD1, GD3, GD4, GD5, GD6, GD7, GD8, NE1, HE1, HE5, H4, H6, E1, ER4, TT4, TT8, TT9, TT10, NR7, NR8, WM1 and LWM2 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014)

 

 In addition, the development has been assessed against the North Town Masterplan as amended June 2011 and the Supplementary Planning Guidance Jersey Gas Site Development Brief (September 2013). In this case, the proposed development is regarded as acceptable having addressed the Aims of Development as set out in the Development Brief, and balanced the objectives of the various individual policies (particularly in relation to the amenities of neighbours, the protection of the historic environment, car parking and the delivery of housing units), within an economically viable development package necessary to secure the regeneration of this underutilised non-conforming hazardous use from the town.

 

 It is considered that the redevelopment of the site offers important benefits in the regeneration of the area by repairing the townscape, improving the vitality and viability of the town and removing a non-conforming hazardous use from the town whilst providing much needed housing and public realm and landscape improvements to the area.  In addition, the representations raised to the scheme have been carefully assessed.

 

The determination acknowledges the presented issues, particularly in relation to the highways and parking issues and regarding the amenities of neighbours by reference to the scale, form and nature of the proposals, and weighs them against the benefits delivered by the application. Taken as a package, it is considered that the application will be positive and beneficial, and that the potential impacts will not be unreasonable in all the circumstances.

 

Resource Implications: None

 

Action required:

 

Notify Agent, Applicant and all other interested parties

 

Signature:

 

Deputy S G Luce

PLeg / AS Initials

Position:

Minister for Planning and Environment

 

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Jersey Gas Site, Tunnell Street, St Helier: Planning Application

 

 

Department of the Environment

Planning and Building Services

South Hill

St Helier, Jersey, JE2 4US

Tel:  +44 (0)1534 445508

Fax: +44 (0)1534 445528

 

 

 

Updated Department of the Environment

Report for Ministerial Meeting

 

1. Application   Number

PP/2014/1125

 

2. Site Address

Jersey Gas Co Site, Tunnell Street, St. Helier, JE2 4LU.

 

 

3. Applicant

Jersey Gas Company Limited

 

 

4. Description

OUTLINE APPLICATION: Demolition of existing gas works and associated office, showroom and staff accommodation. Construction of new residential development comprising 297 No.1, 2 and 3 bed dwellings and associated residential facilities, commercial units, semi-basement parking, ancillary areas, landscaping amenities and public realm improvements. All matters reserved excluding siting, massing, means of access and landscape. EIA submitted. 3D Digital Model Available.

 

 

5. Type

Major Application

 

 

6. Date Validated

11/07/2014

 

 

7. Zones & Constraints

Town of St. Helier
Built-Up Area
Primary Route Network
Regeneration Zone
Safety Zone Hazardous Install

 

Summary

 

The planning application is an outline application to consider the principle of development, siting, massing, means of access, parking and landscape. The detailed elevation design and servicing is to be considered at the next Reserved Matters stage.

 

The application proposes the demolition of all buildings on the site including the gas storage holder.  The site would be redeveloped with 297 residential units and 2 commercial units in 4 main blocks of development varying between 3 storeys in the eastern part of the site to 6 storey’s in the north.

 

The North Town Masterplan adopted June 2011 proposes that the Jersey Gas site is suitable for significant new residential development of approx. 300 homes should it become surplus to the Gas Company’s requirements and if it can extend its site at La Collette onto States Land.

 

The proposed development is broadly in accord with the North Town Masterplan with 297 residential units proposed and Jersey Gas proposed to relocate to La Collette. In addition there would be enclosed public open space, pedestrian links through the site, commercial or community units within the site and a range of building heights from 3 to 6 storeys.

 

A Development Brief for the Jersey Gas Site was adopted and revised in September 2013. It is considered that the proposed development is in general accord with the Development Brief and meets the key principles and aims of the Brief.

 

The Development Brief makes reference to the biennial review of parking in St Helier that is undertaken to establish parking needs/demand. Following the last Biennial review in June 2013, the Development Brief was amended in September 2013 to reflect the Parking Review and amend the need to provide public parking on the application site and instead proposed replacing this with a negotiated commuted sum. TTS Highways have agreed a sum of £861,000 with the Applicant and it is considered that this commuted sum is acceptable and should be included in the Planning Obligation Agreement.

 

The density of the development is considered to be at the highest reasonable density, with concerns expressed regarding the impact on properties on Tunnell Street from the 5 storey residential block in the south-west part of the site. In the Department’s consideration this is a finely balanced argument.

 

As part of the original planning application, 4 listed buildings at Fauxbie Villas were proposed to be demolished. The Applicant submitted with the planning application an Architectural and Historical Appraisal of Fauxbie Villas which detailed that the buildings were built in 1933/34 and that the listing of these buildings was questionable as they have little intrinsic architectural or historical significance.

 

The previous Listed Building Schedule for Fauxbie Villas stated (incorrectly as it turns out) that these buildings were constructed in the 1920’s. Following the Applicant’s submissions the listing of Fauxhie Villas was reviewed by Jersey Heritage who revised their recommendation as they considered that the heritage value of the buildings does not warrant their designation when considered against the Minister’s published criteria for listing and the buildings have subsequently been de-listed.

 

It is considered that the redevelopment of this site offers important benefits in the regeneration of the area by repairing the townscape, improving the vitality and viability of the town and removing a non-conforming hazardous use from the town whilst providing much needed housing and public realm and landscape improvements to the area.

 

Department Recommendation

Approval

 

8. Site Description & Existing Use

The application site is situated on the east side of the town ring road, has a gross site area of approximately 2 ¼ acres (9,632 sq.m.) and is located in an area of the town consisting of commercial and residential uses.

 

The area formed part of the 19th century residential expansion of the town that over took and surrounded the gas works which had originally been on the perimeter of the town.

 

The site extends from the new town park through to St. Saviour’s Road (the town ring road) and has vehicular access directly onto L’Avenue et Dolmen du Pre des Lumieres and Tunnell Street.

 

The buildings and uses on the site comprise a gas holder, gas

compression plant, showrooms, offices and stores, together with car parking and hard standing. The eastern, and part of the southern perimeter, comprises two storey houses. In addition there is evidence of significant archaeology in the area: the Dolmen Du Pre Des Lumieres is located near the northern boundary of the site and its surroundings remain archaeologically sensitive and are designated accordingly.

 

The height of the existing development surrounding the site ranges

from five storey down to two storey. The Channel Islands Co-operative Society’s Grand Marché supermarket, situated to the north of the site on L’Avenue et Dolmen du Pre des Lumieres, is approximately five storeys in height. The properties to the south and east are predominantly residential two storey town houses and flats. The gas holder located in the centre of the site is approximately seven-eight storeys high.

 

 

9. Proposed Development

The planning application is an outline application to consider the principle of development, siting design, means of access, parking and landscape. The detailed elevation design and servicing is to be considered at the next Reserved Matters stage.

 

The application proposes the demolition of all buildings on the site including the gas storage holder.  The site would be redeveloped with 297 residential units and 2 commercial units in 4 main blocks of development varying between 3 storey’s in the eastern part of the site to 6 storey’s in the north.

 

Semi-basement parking in 2 separate underground parking areas would be provided with vehicle access from the north on L’Avenue et Dolmen du Pre des Lumieres and from the south on Tunnell Street. 237 car parking spaces are proposed at a ratio of 0.77 per residential unit and 308 bicycle bays are proposed.

 

Public access routes are proposed through the development with wide steps from the Town Park into the development and routes from the west to north-east with a central square and two routes from north to south through the site.

 

An Environmental Impact Assessment, Transport Assessment, Design Statement, Planning Statement, Architectural and Historical Appraisal, Historic Environment Assessment, Percentage for Art Assessment and 3D Digital Model have been submitted with this application.

 

 

10. Relevant Planning History

Planning Permit P/2000/1578 issued in 2000 for a change of use from external gas storage area into temporary car park for a period of 3 years. 

 

This Permit was extended in 2005 and again in 2011 (ref: RC/2011/0153) for a further 5 years until 21.04.2016.

 

11. Consultations

Parish Roads Committee in its letter dated 13 August 2014 can be summarised as follows:

 

1. Car Parking

No public car parking is provided on the site and a commuted sum proposed instead. No detail is provided on how this will be delivered and in what timescale.

 

The Parish reiterates its comments made in May 2012 to the Planning Department that the loss of 610 public car parking spaces from the Gas Works and Talman site must be replaced, in part, on the current application site. This sector of St Helier suffers a dearth of such facilities and the provision of short stay shoppers parking and long term residential space, the latter to serve the immediate residential area is a necessity. The Parish believe that this development should not be determined unless public parking as described is included or an alternative scheme within the timescale of this development can be delivered in the near vicinity.

 

The provision of private off-street parking for the residential units at a ratio of 0.77 per unit is acceptable to the Parish given the site’s proximity to local bus services and town centre. The proposal for one bicycle space in a secure store is welcomed.

 

2. Pedestrian facilities/footpath enhancement

The applicant has provided generous footways on the north of the site but the degree of improvement on St Saviours Road and Tunnell Street is considered insufficient.

 

The Parish will not support the new vehicle access on Tunnell Street to the basement parking area without major improvement to the road layout at this point. The existing footpath to the south of Tunnell Street is woefully inadequate at 0.63m wide in places and a carriageway width of 4m and northern footpath measuring 1.25m. Footpaths measuring a minimum of 1.5m to both sides with a carriageway of 5.4m must be provided.

 

3. Pedestrian and cycling permeability

The provision of pedestrian corridors both east/west and north/south is welcomed but the junction of the latter with Tunnell Street must be improved. If cycling is to be encouraged residents need to feel they can access their dwelling easily without the need to travel down to the car park area.

 

4. Vehicular access

Concerns regarding visibility at the entrance/exit to the northern car park to oncoming traffic from La Rue le Masurier. This distance should be improved or measures put in place to reduce speed.

Tunnell Street car park entrance need revising to meet statutory visibility distances.

 

5. Refuse/recycling

None of the 6 refuse stores have off street loading facilities. Of particular concern are the three stores on the north elevation. Serious consideration should be given to suitable pull in bays for the refuse lorry.

 

6. Servicing of development by vehicular traffic

The servicing and delivery needs of 297 units is considerable. No detail has been provided as to whether the basement car park can accommodate any of these activities. Adequate pull in bays must be provided at street level.

 

7. Commercial units

The inclusion of two commercial units is welcomed although no detail is provided as to what use they will be put to. To address this, a regime of delivery of goods needs to be set in place at an early stage to ensure the ring road is kept free.

 

8. Encroachments

Difficult to establish whether any element of the structure encroaches over the public highway.

 

9. Construction process

The construction process is to be discussed with the highway authority at an early stage. The Parish will not permit Tunnell Street to be used for the construction process without application to the Roads Committee’.

 

 

Highways section of TTS in its letter dated 22 August 2014 state:

Policy

‘The development of this site for housing is supported as it is consistent with the States sustainable transport policy, in that it provides housing at a location where the options to travel by means other than private car are good.

 

The North Town Master plan requirement for 138 public parking places at this site was amended by the St Helier Parking Needs Study.  The study recommended that the requirement for parking on the site, to compensate for the loss of public parking at the town park, should be changed into a commuted payment to assist the States in providing public parking in a more cost effective way.  That recommendation was approved jointly by the Ministers for Planning and Environment and Transport and Technical Services.   It is recommended that to meet that requirement the developer provides a sum of £861,000 to be paid to TTS car park trading account.

 

Traffic Generation

Because of the central town location, the low predicted trip rates in the Transport Assessment (TA) are considered reasonable.  Furthermore the TA doesn’t make any allowance for existing traffic generation which is likely to be at least that of the predicted housing development, hence the net impact on traffic generation in that area should be insignificant if not a reduction.  However in order to assist in achieving the low predicted trip rate it is important that a successful travel plan is put in place and we recommend that this is a condition of permission.

 

Public Transport

In accordance with Island Plan policy TT8 the development should provide appropriate infrastructure to support public transport and bus use. There are no suitable locations however within the site for a bus shelter to be incorporated into the development, assuming the current bus routes through the area do not alter.  It is therefore recommended that a payment is made of £7,500, in advance of commencement of development, to enable TTS to provide a bus shelter, elsewhere in the proximity of the site.

 

Parking Provision

236 residential parking spaces are proposed for 297 units (0.79 spaces per unit).  This ratio is considered appropriate given that 30% of households in St Helier do not have a car (2011 Jersey census).

 

Vehicular Access

The access from the basement car park onto Avenue es Dolmen du Pres de Lumieres provides inadequate visibility towards the junction with La Rue le Masurier.  The access will need to be moved further west to ensure visibility of at least 40m by 2.4m.  A plan at 1/200 is required to evidence the visibility splays.  Visibility must also be provided between vehicles and pedestrians on the footpath (as detailed in TTS document “Roads serving small housing developments technical guidance notes”).  Vehicle ramps to the basement car park need to be at a slope of less than 1:20(5%) for a distance of at least 5m from the edge of the Highway (for the avoidance of doubt the Highway includes the road side footpath).

 

There appear to be no unloading facilities and it is not clear what headroom is to be provided should vans wish to use the basement car park.  The bin store for block D is positioned on the bend of La Rue le Masurier, which is a busy part of the ring road and not a position where the refuse vehicle should stop to load refuse for 68 units of accommodation.  It is recommended that that bin store is relocated and that unloading facilities are included in the scheme (but not on La Rue Le Masurier).

 

The commercial units are also sited on the junction of La Rue le Masurier/Avenue es Dolmen du Pre des Lumieres.  It is not clear what commercial use is intended but given their proximity to a busy ring road junction it would be inadvisable to allow a use which encouraged short stay parking, such as a convenience grocers store.

 

Cycle parking

The proposed provision of 308 bike spaces is welcomed, though these appear to be double stacks of very narrow lockers with very limited manoeuvring space, which may prove to be inconvenient and inadequate. Allowance should also be made for some cycle parking at ground floor level conveniently located near entrances to the blocks for visitors and those residents who may not wish to access the basement parking for every cycle trip.

 

Footpaths

The proposals show a widening of the footpath on St Saviour’s road.  This will be a significant benefit for pedestrian movement and also aid visibility for vehicles emerging from Tunnel Street.  The footpath should be widened to 2m and the land ceded to the States to become part of the public highway.   The plans also indicate a widening of the footpath alongside Avenue es Dolmen du Pres de Lumieres from 1.8m to 2.4m.  This is also welcomed though not strictly necessary other than to guarantee visibility splays at the vehicular access.

 

The footpath links with the town park and adjacent road network are welcomed though the accesses through to the town park and to Avenue es Dolmen du Pres de Lumieres, both indicate steps.  Wheelchair ramps should be provided.

 

TTS – Parks and Gardens Section – Impact on adjacent Millennium Town Park

 

1. Proximity of the development to the boundary and proposal to demolish boundary wall 

 

The department considers that Blocks A and C are too close to the boundary of the Park.  It also does not support the proposal to demolish the wall that currently separates the east end of the park from the proposed site for development. 

 

Construction at the boundary of the park needs to be designed to avoid compromising the park residual contaminated soils containment liner system which is battened to the eastern boundary wall sub-structure (any construction on the adjoining site will need to be planned to avoid any damage to this system).

 

 

(a) Proximity of proposed buildings to boundary wall

 

Blocks A and C are considered to be too close to the boundary wall.  To avoid damage to the wall and its environs during construction we require that the development is set back from the boundary at a distance to be agreed with TTS engineers, to allow sufficient space for basement construction and erection of scaffolding. 

 

This set back will also allow for any future maintenance and repair of the new buildings.

 

(b)  Removal of boundary wall

 

This wall is owned by the Public and will provide an extremely important barrier/buffer between the proposed development and the park.  The plants growing on, and immediately in front of the wall, provide an important green back drop to the east end of the park and at the same time effectively enclose and delineate the eastern boundary.

 

The removal of the wall and the existing planting will adversely alter the character of the area.  In particular, as the replacement planting suggested by the designers consists of low planting and/or low formal hedges to allow ground floor residents to look out onto the Park.  It is the developers intention that this ‘low planting’ theme will extend into the existing planted areas found at the east end of the Park. Instead of low planting, height is required to try and lessen the impact of the buildings on the general ambience of the Park.  

 

As part of the Planning consent for the development of the Park and in accordance with the States of Jersey ‘Urban Habitat Statement’, the Park planting design provided as many opportunities as possible to provide areas rich in biodiversity.  This has been most successful at the east end of the park adjacent to the boundary wall.  The current proposed development design will see all of this planting removed and replaced, post construction, with low level and formal planting offering only limited biodiversity value.

 

The west façade of blocks A and C look directly over the park.  The design provides ground floor ‘verandas’ with balconies for upper story dwellings.  The removal of the boundary wall and the replacement of the existing planting with low planting and/or low formal hedges will enable ground floor residents to look directly out on to the park from their ground floor verandas and upper balconies.

 

This creates two significant problems:

 

  The verandas and balconies of Block A will look directly on to the ‘water jets’ at the east end of the Park which have been specifically designed to enable interactive play by young children.  There are concerns that some parents will be extremely uncomfortable that residents of the proposed development are able to watch their children playing in the water.

 

   The park provides a vibrant and often energetic communal area that is open 24 hours a day.  It is an extremely popular meeting place for young people and inevitably this will result in complaints from future residents about noise, loss of privacy and general antisocial behaviour.

 

 

2. New Access through Park boundary to internal landscaped areas of   proposed development

 

The department is generally supportive of this aspect of the design however it is the department’s opinion that it may, at some point be necessary to ‘gate’ this throughway if problems of antisocial behaviour become a problem’.

 

 

Drainage section of TTS in its letter dated 30 July 2014 state:

‘There is a public foul sewer available in Tunnell Street that will require removal, replacement and upgrading to facilitate the drainage from this proposal. The cost of this will be borne by the Owner of the site with full design agreed in advance and undertaken by a contractor to be agreed by the Department.

 

Existing foul connections shall be terminated to prevent debris entering the system during demolition and construction.

 

Surface water drainage from the developed site shall connect into the existing public surface water sewers and the cost borne by the owner of the site.

 

On the site lies Le Grand Douet, the old town brook, and the only open section left in St Helier. No foul or surface drainage from this proposal will be allowed to enter this system’.

 

Environmental Health of H&SS in its letter dated 07 August 2014 state: ‘I advise that 3 planning conditions are attached as follows:

  • Demolition/Construction Environmental Management Plan
  • Contaminated land-watching brief following Phase 1
  • Contaminated land- completion

 

Certain Informatives are recommended as listed in the letter’.

 

 

Land Controls and Agricultural Development Section of DoE in its letter dated 04 August 2014 state: ‘No comment’

 

 

Health and Safety Inspectorate in its letter dated 16 July 2014 state: ‘No comment’.

 

 

Environmental Protection Section of DoE in its letter dated 18 August 2014 state: ‘Recommend planning conditions as follows:

  • Contaminated land
  • Demolition/Construction Environmental Management plan
  • Waste Management Plan
  • Culverting of town brook

 

Informatives recommended for: Asbestos, Interceptors and Suds’.

 

 

Historic Environment Team of DoE in its memo dated 04 September 2014 state the following:

 

‘The proposals require the complete loss of all the potential Listed Buildings on the site and the destruction of all below ground archaeology and potential archaeology to accommodate basement car parking. This is contrary to Policy HE1 and as such we object in the strongest terms to the avoidable wholesale loss of these important heritage assets

 

EIA and Non-Technical Summary

The conclusion of the EIA is that whilst there is very strong evidence to suggest important archaeological remains are in situ indicated as probable 3.4 to 5.7m below ground level with potential for other interests the use of post decision evaluation will allow the loss to be minimised or mitigated. This runs contrary to the majority of the site being used for basement car parking, to retain any remains in situ would suggest that the car parking is omitted. Furthermore the proposed piling will destroy any underlying archaeology at the lower horizons. If car parking and indeed piles are omitted the terms of any future Permit will be compromised. In this situation it is most likely the historic environment will have to bear the loss. As such this mitigation proposed is not acceptable and does not meet the policy requirements of HE5.

 

The Desk Based Assessment at Appendix 6 clearly states that there is high potential for prehistoric archaeological as well as paleo-environmental and geo-archaeological remains within the site. The mitigation proposed includes borehole to assess the depth and nature of archaeological horizons and then use this to inform a field evaluation. A watching brief is also proposed. The major difficulty with this approach is that no retention in situ of any significant remains will be possible. As such we would not support these conclusions, but seek a better understanding of the site through borehole evaluation prior to determination. The site does of course also contain high potential for ground contamination which could further compromise archaeological assessment.

 

The loss of four pLB’s is predicated on a view that these have no or little intrinsic interest. The recent resurvey of these properties by an independent team reviewing the whole Island’s stock of protected buildings had a contrary view and as such the recommendation of full Listing is made to the Minister. The loss of any protected building is an exception and has to be properly justified. The arguments suggests they don’t fit the 19th century aesthetic of the area and are not of value in themselves does not outweigh the strong policy presumption for their retention.

 

We do not agree that the impact on cultural heritage is “minor adverse” this does seem to be a perverse conclusion given the existing designations on site.

 

The removal of a large gas holder to be replaced with equally large but greater mass of new development cannot in itself be deemed to be of benefit. The removal of the gas holder in itself could be argued to be such, but the replacement with a greater scale of development will have detrimental impacts on the settings of adjacent protected buildings. Thus we do not agree with the conclusions that this will be visually beneficial.

 

Design Statement

The Policy context under HE1 allows for a balance between the strong presumption to retain historic assets against wider community benefits. The DS sets out the wider scale community gains but this is not used to balance the proposed loss of historic assets. The DS is silent on the loss of heritage assets. As set out above the argument made in the EIA and Policy review statements is based on a view of the lack of heritage interest of buildings and a high risk strategy for the archaeological remains being acceptable. Neither approach is accepted.

 

We note the aerial view on page 10 which would be an informative addition the townscape assessment as would wider views from Fort Regent and Victoria Crescent.

 

The DS clearly illustrates the detrimental impact Blocks C and D have on localized historic buildings to the south, and the impact of Block A on the 19th century townscape to the north west of the site due to the mass, scale and proximity of the development to the smaller scale and townscape grain of this part of St Helier.

 

Conclusion

In conclusion HET strongly object to the Application as set out above, but in summary because of

 

 Demolition of HE0703, HE0751, HE0702 and HE1514 – potential Listed Buildings,

 Detrimental impact on the known archaeological assets and the potential archaeological assets as protected by the Listed Place HE0784 and Area of Archaeological Potential HE1857 and

 impact of new development on the setting of heritage assets and the lack of consideration of the mitigation of these impacts within the application.

 

Policy SP4 and Policy HE1 and HE5 of the 2011 Jersey Island Plan, which seek to preserve the special historic, architectural and archaeological interest of Listed Buildings and Places has been used to guide this assessment.

 

Furthermore the buildings are a potential Listed Buildings for which the consideration of the impact of works and development is a material consideration to be taken into account when assessing this application and specifically cited in any decision notice.

 

(Please note that since these consultation comments from Historic Environment have been received, the buildings at Fauxbie Villas have been de-listed)

 

Jersey Police in its letter dated 01 September state: no comment.

 

All consultations are attached with the background papers

 

 

12. Representations

7 letters of objection have been received which can be summarised as follows:

 

  • Overdevelopment and a monstrosity in an already built up densely populated area
  • Out of keeping with character of the area
  • Noise and light pollution
  • Unacceptable increase in traffic generation
  • Increased traffic on Tunnell Street which cannot be widened due to lack of stability due to the tunnel underneath
  • Tunnell Street not wide enough for 2 cars to pass
  • Problems of subsidence
  • Not enough parking
  • Unacceptable impact on neighbours by virtue of loss of privacy
  • Springfield and Rouge Bouillon schools already oversubscribed
  • Loss of listed buildings
  • Disruption during construction
  • Loss of open view

 

The Agent on behalf of the Applicant has responded in letters dated 18 August and 09 September 2014 as follows:

 

  • The proposed heights of the buildings are in accordance with the Development Brief. Elevations on Tunnell Street are 5 storeys in the south-west corner, but generally 4 storeys above a semi-basement car park of approx. 1.2m for the remainder of the street
  • Proposed distances window to window on Tunnell Street range from 8.2m to 14.7m and this relationship is typical of the streetscape in this part of St Helier.
  • The submitted Transport Assessment concludes that the development will generate a modest number of vehicle trips and have an insignificant effect on the local highway network
  • The current site includes parking for 93 vehicles with access from Tunnell Street, this compares to 51 proposed parking spaces with direct access from Tunnell Street
  • The construction process will be undertaken by a team of experienced competent contractors and will be carefully monitored by the Health and Safety Executive and the construction works are temporary and the contractors will work with the local community to minimise noise and disturbance
  • Commuted parking payment in line with the Development Brief
  • Substantial public realm improvements
  • The lifts to the basement parking will be large enough to accommodate bicycles as well as via the car park ramps. Could also include external bicycle storage at the detailed design phase
  • The final detailed design, layout and geometry of the vehicle entrances will be agreed as part of Reserved Matters stage.
  • The refuse/recycling storage and servicing will be developed as part of the detailed design phase at Reserved Matters.
  • Is envisaged that the 2 commercial units will be used for service type retail or community use.

 

All letters of representation and responses are attached with the background papers

 

13. Planning

Assessment

 

 

 

 

a) Overarching policy constraints

The application falls to be considered in the context of the policies within the Jersey Island Plan 2011 as amended. The key policies which are particularly relevant to this application are set out below, with a short assessment of whether the scheme is considered to comply.

 

Policy SP1 – Spatial Strategy – sets out that development will be concentrated in the Island’s Built-Up Area, as defined on the Proposals Map.

 

This application is within the Built-Up Area.

 

Policy SP2 – Efficient Use of Resources – sets out that development should make the most efficient and effective use of land, energy, water resources and buildings to help deliver a more sustainable form and patters of sustainable development. In particular the proposed spatial distribution of new development should be designed to limit carbon emissions.

 

This proposal is considered to be an appropriate location for new residential development.

 

Policy SP3 – Sequential Approach to Development – establishes a hierarchy of priorities for development in favour of sustainable development patterns.

 

The application clearly accords with this priority.

 

Policy SP4 – Protecting the Natural and Historic Environment – provides for a high level of protection for the Island’s natural and historic environment which contributes to and defines its unique character and identity.

 

The proposed development subject to planning conditions on archaeology is considered to be in accordance with Policy SP4. This matter is considered in more detail later in this Report.

 

Policy SP6 – Reducing Dependence on the Car – applications must be able to demonstrate that they will reduce dependence on the private car by providing for more environmentally friendly modes of transport.

 

The site is well located to facilitate walking into central St Helier, and the submitted Transport Statement is endorsed by TTS Highways.

 

Policy SP7 – Better by Design – this confirms that all development must be of a high quality design that maintains and enhances the character and appearance of the area in which it is located.

 

This issue is discussed in more detail in the later sections of this Report.

 

Policy GD1 - General Development Considerations - states that development proposals will not be permitted unless the proposal contributes towards a more sustainable form and pattern of development, does not seriously harm the natural and historic environment, does not unreasonably harm the amenities of neighbouring uses, contributes or does not detract from the Island’s economy, contributes to reducing the dependence on the car, and is of a high quality of design.

 

The key considerations from this Policy will be reviewed in the later sections of this Report.

 

Policy GD3 – Density of development – Seeks to contribute towards a more sustainable approach to the development and redevelopment of land and will require that the highest reasonable density is achieved for all developments, commensurate with good design, adequate amenity space and parking.

 

The proposed density of the proposed development is 289 habitable rooms per acre, which compares with 230 habitable rooms per acre at the recent residential redevelopment at Jersey College for Girls site (P/2013/0337) for example and compares with Department Guidance which suggests a figure of 100 – 120 hr/a in central St Helier.

 

Policy GD4 – Planning obligations – Where as a direct consequence of a development, additional infrastructure or amenities are required a planning obligation may be used where it is necessary and appropriate to do so.

 

Policy GD5 – Skyline, Views and Vistas – this policy seeks to protect or enhance the skyline, strategic views, important vistas and the setting of landmark buildings and places.

 

These issues are reviewed in more detail later in this Report.

 

Policy GD6 – Contaminated Land – Proposals will be permitted on contaminated land provided satisfactory investigations have been undertaken and an acceptable programme of treatment identified.

 

The advice of consultees is that standard conditions can satisfactorily deal with these issues.

 

Policy GD7 - Design Quality - requires that a high quality of design that respects, conserves and contributes positively to the diversity and distinctiveness of the landscape and built context will be sought in all developments.

 

The issues relevant to this assessment are considered in the later sections of this Report.

 

Policy GD8 - Percentage for Art - states that the Minister will encourage the contribution of a percentage of design and development costs to the provision of public art.

 

A contribution of approximately £375,000 is proposed for the percentage for art. This contribution would be spent on 4 main aspects:

  • A contemporary interpretation of the geological history of the site,
  •  A sculpture interpreting the nearby megalithic cyst and avenue,
  •  A contemporary interpretation of La Grande Douet stream using lighting systems and stonemasonry and poetry running the entire length of the site from  north to south,
  • Corten steel sculptures and lighting structures showing the history of the Jersey Gas Company.

 

Policy NE1 – Conservation and Enhancement of Biodiversity – there is a presumption in favour of applications which deliver these objectives.

 

The submission includes an acknowledgement that protected species might be present and the responses from consultees propose conditions to manage such work and mitigate any impacts.

 

Objectives BE1- Built environment objectives and BE2 – Regeneration of St Helier objectives

 

These objectives seek the regeneration and enhancement of the built environment and St Helier including creating public realm and access improvements, to maintain the role and support the development and regeneration of St Helier and to develop a vision and overarching strategy for St Helier.

 

These objectives are the precursor to a programme of SPG’s (which have not yet been prepared) to focus on the Regeneration Zones identified within the Island Plan.

 

Policy HE1 – Protecting Listed Buildings and Places – establishes a presumption in favour of preserving and enhancing the special interest of Listed buildings and places and their setting.

 

These matters are considered in detail later in this Report.

 

Policy HE5 – Preservation of Archaeological Resources – planning applications which may impact on archaeological resources should include the necessary assessment.

 

The application includes baseline investigations and the conclusions are considered later in this Report.

 

Policy H4 – Housing Mix – developments are expected to contribute a variety of sizes of homes.

 

The application includes a reasonable mix of units, including 1, 2 and 3-bed accommodation.

 

Policy H6 – Housing Development within the Built-Up Area – proposals for new dwellings will be permitted, provided developments accord with the Standards for housing as set out in Supplementary Planning Guidance.

 

The development is in the Built-Up Area, and the unit sizes are in accordance with the required standards.

 

The proposed amenity space for the development is as follows:

a.       The area of ground level shared amenity space as shown hatched in red on the Ground Floor Plan extends to 2,503 m2

b.      The total amount of private residential amenity space provided within the development including ground level private patios/terraces, upper floor balconies and roof level shared amenity areas extends to 4,312 m2

c.       Typical private balconies for 1 bed units vary from 5.1 m2 to 13 m2 and for 2 bed apartments from 8.3 m2 to 17 m2. 3 bed townhouse units have 35 m2 roof terraces + additional 5.1 m2 balconies at lower levels.

d.      The average level of private amenity space per unit is 14.5 m2.

 

The Planning Department have the following on site amenity standards for apartments (as specified in the ‘Minimum Specification For New Housing Developments document 1994’:

30m2 per family flat of 2 bedrooms and above

20m2 per non-family flat under 2 bedrooms

 

It is considered that taking into account both the private and public amenity areas within the site as set out above and its location adjacent to the Town Park that the proposed amenity space provision  is acceptable

 

With regard to car parking provision, 236 residential parking spaces are proposed for 297 units (which equates to 0.79 spaces per unit).  This proposed provision is considered acceptable taking into account its central sustainable location within walking distance of the town centre and close to public transport. Note is also taken of TTS Highways support for the proposed level of parking provision and who comment that the ratio is considered appropriate given that 30% of households in St Helier do not have a car (2011 Jersey census).

 

Policy E1 – Protection of employment land – states that there will be a presumption against development which results in the loss of land for employment use unless 1 of the 4 listed criteria are met.

 

Criteria 3 of Policy E1 states that: ‘the overall benefit to the community of the proposal outweighs any adverse effect on employment opportunities and the range of available employment land and premises’.

 

Criteria 4 states: ‘the existing use is generating environmental problems such as noise, pollution or unacceptable levels of traffic and any alternative employment use would continue to generate similar environmental problems.

 

It is considered that the proposed development is in accord with Criteria 3 of Policy E1 in that there would be an overriding environmental and community benefit for the regeneration of the area as detailed in the North of Town Masterplan and the Jersey Gas Development Brief.

 

The development would involve the relocation of a potentially hazardous use from this part of town, would provide a contribution to the provision of public car parking and would provide wider public realm and pedestrian enhancements in the area.

 

Jersey Gas would be relocated to La Collette as a result of this development and therefore the employment use would not be entirely lost to the Island just relocated. It is considered that the aforementioned benefits outweigh any loss of employment on the site.

 

Policy ER4 – Development of local shops – Proposals for new small local shops of 100 sqm will be permitted within the Built up Area provided that they will not unreasonably affect the character and amenity of the area.

 

The proposed retail units are limited in scale, would provide a valuable service to residents and within the wider context of the development and neighbourhood would not unreasonably affect the character and amenity of the area.

 

Policy TT4 - Cycle Parking - requires cycle parking provision in all new developments.

 

One cycle bay per residential unit is proposed which is considered to accord with Policy TT4.

 

Policy TT8 – Access to Public Transport – seeks to ensure that where bus services are low or infrequent in relation to the scale or nature of development proposals, that the developer will be expected to support the provision of an appropriate service.

 

The proposal is well located in relation to access to bus services.

 

Policy TT9 – Travel Plans – proposals which would generate significant amounts of traffic will be required to submit travel plans to reduce the reliance on the private car.

 

A condition is recommended to ensure a Travel Plan is submitted.

 

Policy NR7 – Renewable Energy in New Developments – requires large developments to incorporate on-site low carbon or renewable energy production equipment to off-set predicted carbon emissions by at least 10%, except where it is demonstrated that such provision would make the development unviable or where it would have an adverse visual or amenity impact.

 

The application is accompanied by a Design and Access Statement which sets out in the Sustainability section how the 10% requirement can be delivered by lower-energy usage, thermal insulation and energy efficient lighting amongst other measures.

 

Policy WM1 - Waste Minimisation and New Development - states that the Minister will encourage the minimisation of waste generated as part of construction activity and an increase in recycling, re-use and recovery of resources. Major developments will only be permitted where measures are taken to minimise the waste arising and to recycle, re-use and recover as much as possible of generated waste materials, and opportunities are taken to maximise on-site management of waste. Where inert waste generated cannot be re-used on site, it should be diverted for recycling with a licensed contractor.

 

A comprehensive Waste Management Plan has been included with the revised application. A critique has already been provided by the technical consultees.

 

Policy LWM2 - Foul Sewerage Facilities - provides that development which results in the discharge of sewerage effluent will not be permitted unless it provides a system of foul drainage that connects to the mains foul sewer.

 

The development will connect to the mains foul sewer network and there is a detailed response from TTS Drainage as the relevant technical consultee.

______________________

 

North St Helier Masterplan adopted by States in proposition P.73/2011 - as amended June 2011

 

The Masterplan identifies 9 Key intervention sites which have specific proposals developed within the Masterplan. One of these 9 sites is the Jersey Gas Site subject to this current planning application.

 

The Masterplan proposes that the Jersey Gas site is suitable for significant new residential development should it become surplus to the Gas Company’s requirements and if it can extend its site at La Collette onto States Land.

 

The Revised Masterplan proposes 24,000 sq metres of housing development providing approx. 300 dwellings, with enclosing public open space and underground car parking for residents and commuters. In addition it is stated that the scheme could also include community or commercial uses and a new link through to Belmont Road.

 

The Masterplan states that any new buildings should be predominantly 5.5 storey’s (including a lower ground floor) and will need to be sympathetic to the scale of surrounding buildings. Indicative elevations of the type of development that may be expected on the site were provided within the Masterplan.  A review of the Listed Buildings on St Saviour’s Road will also be undertaken to see if they merit their listing.

 

With regard car parking it is stated there would be 180 below ground residential parking spaces and 138 car parking spaces for long stay public use.

 

The proposed development is broadly in accord with the North Town Masterplan with 297 residential units proposed and Jersey Gas proposed to relocate to La Collette. In addition there would be enclosed public open space, pedestrian links through the site, commercial or community units within the site and a range of building heights from 3 to 6 storeys.

 

The Masterplan sets out a need to provide a pedestrian/cycle link from Tunnell Street through to Belmont Road and on to cycle routes. The Parish of St Helier have confirmed that they have purchased the land to provide a pedestrian/cycle link from Tunnell Street through to Belmont Road and this gained Parish Assembly approval on 21 November 2012 with planning permission being subsequently granted for this link. Therefore there is no need to include the need for a pedestrian link in the Planning Obligation Agreement.

 

With regard to car parking, there is some divergence from the Masterplan in that whilst underground car parking for residents will be provided; public car parking will not be provided on site. Instead a commuted sum of £861,000 has been agreed between TTS Highways and the Applicant to provide public car parking elsewhere in St Helier. The reason this option has been taken is that by providing public car parking on the application site itself it would result in a huge escalation in build cost by the need for a much larger basement car park on 2 levels and resultant impact on archaeology, contaminated land issues, waste disposal and very importantly huge traffic implications from and to the site with cars coming and going throughout the day leading to traffic congestion and potential traffic problems on surrounding streets such as Tunnell Street.

 

Bearing these issues in mind it is considered that the commuted sum to provide public car parking off site is acceptable.

 

Supplementary Planning Guidance: Development Brief: Jersey Gas Site September 2013 (Revision A)

 

The Development Brief has been reviewed and amended in response to the findings of a public consultation and adopted in June 2012 by the Minister for Planning and Environment It has subsequently been revised, in September 2013, to reflect changes related to the delivery of affordable homes and the provision of car parking. The new guidance was intended to provide the framework for the assessment and determination of any subsequent planning application.

 

The key principles of the development are listed in the Development Brief as follows:

 

‘The redevelopment of this area offers a significant opportunity to repair the townscape and remove a non-conforming hazardous use from the town and elsewhere.

 

It provides an opportunity to create a predominantly residential

development, which contributes to the Island’s specific housing needs, within walking distance to schools and the town centre.

 

There is also the potential to secure a contribution to the provision of nearby shortstay public car parking, of benefit to local business and residents replacing some of that lost to the provision of the Town Park, as well as public realm enhancements, in accord with the objectives provided by the North of Town Masterplan’.

 

Having established the key principles, the Brief then includes the “Aims of development” which are identified as:

 

  • to secure a positive environmental and social improvement

for the Town Park area by the removal of a potentially hazardous uses from the Jersey Gas site in Tunnell Street, St. Helier, and to create the potential for the relocation of the LPG storage site at Les Ruettes, St. John, to more appropriate locations;

  • to assist in the regeneration of the area and breathe new life

into the town;

  • to provide a predominantly residential development that

contributes to the provision of affordable homes;

  • to incorporate some limited small-scale commercial, retail

use/or a community use to serve local needs;

  • to secure a contribution towards the provision of alternative

public and residents’ car parking and to contribute towards the enhancement of the public realm in the immediate locality and also the North of Town area;

  • to create a design that makes a positive contribution and

improvement to the physical context of the neighbourhood, and which provides a focal point, enclosure and physical connection with the new Town Park;

  • to deliver a form of development that responds to the heritage value of the site and its context;
  • to provide a well-designed development that is efficient in

terms of space and energy consumption, making best use of the area of land available;

  • to provide the people who will live there with the best level

of amenity, in all its aspects, given the site’s location on the town ring road and proximity to the new Town Park’.

 

The Development Brief then sets out more detailed issues, but states that these are not meant to be prescriptive and a degree of flexibility may be applied. Amongst the detailed issues listed are:

 

  1. The density of the new development must emerge from a design led solution and be the highest consistent with maintaining reasonable standards of design, space about buildings and privacy, appropriate to the type of accommodation provided and the general surroundings.

 

  1. The Minister for Planning and Environment will apply a balanced approach, in accordance with his obligations under the law and internationally, in weighing up any negative impact of change on the integrity of the Listed buildings and archaeology against the need to secure the long-term future of heritage assets and the wider regenerative benefits of any proposed scheme.

 

  1. The North Town Masterplan originally required on-site public parking to be provided to replace the parking lost as a result of the development of the Town Park and, on this basis, the development was to provide 138 public spaces, to be made available for shopper short-stay and local residents’ parking at prevailing public parking rates.

 

However, the Masterplan also made provision for a biennial review of parking needs to be undertaken and following an independent review of parking needs in St Helier the provision of public parking will no longer be required on the site, instead it is replaced by a negotiated commuted sum which will be used to support the initiatives of the Sustainable Transport Policy. Accordingly, the sum will be advised by the Minister for Transport and Technical Services and secured by a planning obligation agreement with the Minister for Planning and Environment.

 

  1. There is considered to be potential for a scheme ranging from six storeys along the northern boundary of the site to up to four storeys along the southern boundary. The southern side should respect the existing street context and care must be taken to ensure that the residential amenity the existing dwellings along Tunnell Street is not compromised in terms of outlook and privacy, and specific attention is given to how the development ‘turns the corners’ to avoid any unduly large blank gables and overbearing impact to the street.

 

  1. The development should make provision for amenity space within the boundaries of the site some of which may contribute to the public realm and be genuinely publicly accessible: the potential to provide public routes through the site should be explored. The private amenity space created must form an integral element of the overall design and layout of the development, and serve a useful purpose to people living there, to ensure that it is convenient and safe to use and also provides visual amenity.

 

It is considered that the proposed development is in general accord with the Development Brief and meets the key principles and aims of the Brief.

 

With regard to the more detailed factors to take into account as set out in the Brief, again it is considered that these are largely met.

 

 The density of the development is considered to be at the highest reasonable density without unacceptable negative impact on the surrounding area whilst maintaining space and light around/to the buildings. A Mixture of between 3 storeys to the east of the site and 6 storeys to the north and centre are proposed which largely accords with the Brief which proposed six storeys to the north and 4 storeys to the south.

 

The Development Brief makes reference to the biennial review of parking in St Helier that is undertaken to establish parking needs/demand. Following the last Biennial review in June 2013, the Development Brief was amended in September 2013 to reflect the Parking Review and amend the need to provide public parking on the application site and instead proposed replacing this with a negotiated commuted sum. TTS Highways have agreed a sum of £861,000 with the Applicant and it is considered that this commuted sum is acceptable and should be included in the Planning Obligation Agreement.

 

 

 

b) Scale

Form, Siting & Design

 

The principle of the demolition of the existing buildings/structures on the application site is considered acceptable. The Masterplan which was adopted by the States Assembly and Development Brief adopted by the Minister for Planning and Environment both highlight that the redevelopment of this site for residential purposes and the demolition of the existing structures was acceptable as it offers a significant opportunity to repair the townscape and remove a non-conforming hazardous use from the town and elsewhere. The redevelopment depends on Jersey Gas relocating to another site which is proposed to be at La Collette.

 

The Revised Masterplan proposes 24,000 sq metres of housing development providing approx. 300 dwellings and further states that there should be a range of building heights from 3 to 6 storeys.

 

The Development Brief states that there is considered to be potential for a scheme ranging from six storeys along the northern boundary of the site to up to four storeys along the southern boundary.

 

The proposed development is for 297 units of accommodation ranging between 3 storeys to the east of the site and 6 storeys to the north and centre. The proposed scale and massing of the scheme is considered acceptable and in line with the Masterplan and Development Brief. The density of the development is considered to be at the highest reasonable density without unacceptable negative impact on the surrounding area although there is some concern regarding the 5 storey block in the south-west part of the site (which is discussed in more detail below).

 

The proposals have been considered three times by the Jersey Architecture Commission (JAC) at the pre-application stage and the submitted scheme seeks to respond to the advice from the JAC (included with the background papers to this Report).

 

At the  JAC Meeting on 12 May 2014 the JAC expressed concerns regarding the relationship between the proposed development on the south side and the existing development on Tunnell Street particularly the hard edge and height of this side of the development needs to be considered further, as well as a greater transition between the Town Park and the development.

 

As a result of these JAC concerns, the proposed development was amended further to soften the development along Tunnell Street with more breaks in the elevational detail and varying the height of the elevation, the extent of the car park basement level wall was reduced and steps and planters introduced. With regard the transition from the Town Park, wide steps were introduced leading between them to allow greater pedestrian permeability into the scheme.

 

The detailed elevational design is to be considered at Reserved Matters stage, but in terms of the general design ethos and architecture, the proposed development is considered to be of a good quality, with interest created through the site with a series of differently articulated buildings and public courtyards/squares and pedestrian thoroughfares. The proposed development responds to the design and form of development set out in the Development Brief and by the JAC.

 

 

c) Impact on the Landscape/Street

The character of the area is of a mixed nature with a variety of residential and commercial uses. The height of the existing development surrounding the site ranges from five storey down to two storey. The Channel Islands Co-operative Society’s Grand Marché supermarket, situated to the north of the site on L’Avenue et Dolmen du Pre des Lumieres, is approximately five storeys in height. The properties to the south and east are predominantly residential two storey town houses and flats. The gas holder located in the centre of the site is approximately seven-eight storeys high.

 

The proposed development would be predominantly residential of varying height although the impression will be of a high density development. It is considered that the application site can take this high density and is in line with the North of Town Masterplan and Development Brief adopted principles, aims and details.

 

 

d) Impact on

Neighbours

To the north/north-west of the site is the Co-op Grande Marche with residential properties on the opposite side of the road to the north-east of the site. The proposed development in this north-east part of the site would be mainly 3 storey in form with a 6 storey block in the centre of the site edging onto the northern boundary of the site.

 

To the east of the site are the Animal Shelter buildings and car park and a two lane main road and pavements, with the proposed development being 4 storey in this location. To the west of the site is the Town Park.

 

To the south is Tunnell Street and it will be this street which will be particularly impacted by the development as the proposed residential blocks in this location will be 3 to 4 storeys in the main part, but also with a 5 storey block to the south-west part of the site.

 

 

A judgement needs to be made on whether this impact on Tunnel Street is acceptable with particular reference to the 5 storey block taking into account the wider benefits of the regeneration of the site, the provision of much needed housing, environmental improvements of decontaminating the site and public realm improvements. In the Departments consideration this is a finely balanced argument.

 

e) Access, Car

Parking & Highways

Considerations

Much of the highways situation has been detailed earlier. In broad terms:

 

Parking

 

Blocks A, B and C are served by an access and egress to the north of the site at Avenue es Dolmen du Pres de Lumieres, providing 185 parking spaces.

 

Block D is served from an access and egress from the south-east part of the site at Tunnell Street with 51 parking spaces.

 

With regard to car parking provision, 236 residential parking spaces are proposed for 297 units (which equates to 0.79 spaces per unit).  This proposed provision is considered acceptable taking into account its central sustainable location within walking distance of the town centre and close to public transport. Note is also taken of TTS Highways and the Parish of St Helier’s support for the proposed level of parking and bicycle provision.

 

308 bike spaces would be provided at a ratio of 1 per unit and is considered acceptable.

 

Public Car parking

 

The Development Brief makes reference to the biennial review of parking in St Helier that is undertaken to establish parking needs/demand. Following the last Biennial review in June 2013, the Development Brief was amended in September 2013 to reflect the Parking Review and amend the need to provide public parking on the application site and instead proposed replacing this with a negotiated commuted sum. TTS Highways have agreed a sum of £861,000 with the Applicant and it is considered that this commuted sum is acceptable and should be included in the Planning Obligation Agreement.

 

The Parish comment that this development should not be determined unless public parking is included or an alternative scheme within the timescale of this development can be delivered in the near vicinity.

 

At present an alternative site for public parking has not been identified, but the Planning Obligation Agreement would be framed in such a way to ensure that this would be achieved to the satisfaction of the Minister.

 

Traffic generation

 

TTS Highways comments that: ‘Because of the central town location, the low predicted trip rates in the Transport Assessment (TA) are considered reasonable.  Furthermore the TA doesn’t make any allowance for existing traffic generation which is likely to be at least that of the predicted housing development, hence the net impact on traffic generation in that area should be insignificant if not a reduction.  However in order to assist in achieving the low predicted trip rate it is important that a successful travel plan is put in place and we recommend that this is a condition of permission’.

 

It is considered that taking into account the Transport Assessment and TTS comments, that the level of traffic generation would be acceptable particularly when taking into account the existing car parking and deliveries to the site.

 

The main access would be from the north on to the main ring road and is considered acceptable.

 

The access on to Tunnell Street is currently used to access 93 parking spaces as well as deliveries to the site. The proposed new access to Tunnell Street would provide access to 51 parking spaces. It is considered that the traffic generation to this access would be reduced from this proposed development and is acceptable.

 

Public realm and footpaths

 

As part of the proposed development, certain public realm improvements will be made including new pedestrian routes through the site, new public spaces and the improvement and extension of footpaths around the site. These improvements are all welcomed and significantly improve the existing permeability and accessibility of the site and environs.

 

TTS Highways are in support of the proposals and comment as follows: ‘The proposals show a widening of the footpath on St Saviour’s road.  This will be a significant benefit for pedestrian movement and also aid visibility for vehicles emerging from Tunnel Street.  The footpath should be widened to 2m and the land ceded to the States to become part of the public highway.   The plans also indicate a widening of the footpath alongside Avenue es Dolmen du Pres de Lumieres from 1.8m to 2.4m.  This is also welcomed though not strictly necessary other than to guarantee visibility splays at the vehicular access’.

 

The Parish of St Helier meanwhile comment that: ‘the applicant has provided generous footways on the north of the site but the degree of improvement on St Saviours Road and Tunnell Street is considered insufficient’.

 

In response to these consultation comments, the footpath in Tunnell Street will be widened and improved in the narrow parts of the existing footpath alongside the gas holder which will link in with the new pedestrian access through the centre of the site from north to south as well as the widened footpath on the west side of St Saviour’s Road. To the north of the site the footpath and public realm will be significantly improved.

 

Vehicle access visibility

TTS Highways state concerns regarding the northern access point as follows: ‘The access from the basement car park onto Avenue es Dolmen du Pres de Lumieres provides inadequate visibility towards the junction with La Rue le Masurier.  The access will need to be moved further west to ensure visibility of at least 40m by 2.4m’. 

 

With regard the southern access point to the car park, the Parish state that they ‘will not support the new vehicle access on Tunnell Street to the basement parking area without major improvement to the road layout at this point’.

 

These vehicle access issues are to be considered in more detail at the Reserved Matters stage to ensure this improved access visibility is achieved.

 

Servicing

TTS Highways express concern that ‘there appear to be no unloading facilities and it is not clear what headroom is to be provided should vans wish to use the basement car park.  The bin store for block D is positioned on the bend of La Rue le Masurier, which is a busy part of the ring road and not a position where the refuse vehicle should stop to load refuse for 68 units of accommodation.  It is recommended that that bin store is relocated and that unloading facilities are included in the scheme (but not on La Rue Le Masurier)’.

 

The Parish comment similarly that: ‘The servicing and delivery needs of 297 units is considerable. No detail has been provided as to whether the basement car park can accommodate any of these activities. Adequate pull in bays must be provided at street level … Serious consideration should be given to suitable pull in bays for the refuse lorry’.

 

It is agreed that the servicing of the development is not currently satisfactory and needs to be improved and is to be considered in more detail at the Reserved Matters stage to ensure this is achieved.

 

 

f) Foul Sewage &

Surface Water

Disposal

The consultation response from TTS Drainage confirms the existing infrastructure is capable of dealing with the new development subject to upgrading. Conditions are recommended to ensure this is done.

 

 

 

g) Landscaping

A landscape plan has been submitted and is considered acceptable. Conditions are recommended to ensure its timely implementation.

 

h) Planning Obligations

If the application is approved there will need to be a Planning Obligation Agreement to secure:

1. £861,000 to secure public car parking elsewhere in St Helier; and

2. the TTS Highways request to fund a bus shelter in the vicinity by way of a £7,500 financial contribution.

 

 

 

i) Other Matters

Historic Environment

 

The Historic Environment section of the Department of the Environment have raised strong objections to proposed development in terms of ‘the destruction of all below ground archaeology and potential archaeology to accommodate basement car parking on site’ and the demolition of the 4 listed buildings at Fauxbie Villas which would be contrary to Policy HE1 of the Island Plan 2011 (Please note these buildings at Fauxbie Villas have since been de-listed)

 

Archaeology

 

As part of the Applicants’ submission, a desk-based archaeological assessment of the application site and a further archaeological report on recommendations for the site dated 23 September 2014 has been submitted by the Museum of London Archaeology (MOLA), which sets out the likely archaeological implications arising from the development and makes recommendations for the mitigation of any impacts.

 

The archaeological assessment sets out that the western third of the site lies within an ‘Area of Archaeological Priority’ and the site contains the ‘Dolmen du Pre des Lumieres’ which is listed as a Site of Special Interest. The site also has a high potential for prehistoric remains.

 

In 1952 excavations were undertaken in the area which revealed two groups of stones dating from the Neolithic period, one forming a dolmen located 10 metres to the north of the site and one an avenue made up of 2 rows of upright stones, this avenue cuts through from the north of the site to the northern boundary of the site.

 

The Assessment goes on to state that development proposals incorporating the basement and piling are likely to have an impact upon prehistoric remains and localised excavations for foundations and drainage channels may have an impact upon medieval and post-medieval remains if present.

 

The Assessment then recommends certain mitigation measures if approval was granted including:

  • The archaeological monitoring of any geotechnical boreholes if proposed;
  • A Watching Brief on works for the guide walls for the secant piling be undertaken and followed by a targeted trenching evaluation of areas considered to be of greater archaeological survival;
  • The results of the Watching Brief and evaluation to enable a mitigation strategy to be implemented.

 

The Historic Environment section state in response to the Archaeological Assessment findings that ‘The conclusions run contrary to the majority of the site being used for basement car parking and to retain any remains in situ would suggest that the car parking is omitted. Furthermore the proposed piling will destroy any underlying archaeology at the lower horizons. If car parking and indeed piles are omitted the terms of any future Permit will be compromised. In this situation it is most likely the historic environment will have to bear the loss. As such this mitigation proposed is not acceptable and does not meet the policy requirements of HE5’.

 

The Historic Environment section also state that ‘A Watching Brief is also proposed. The major difficulty with this approach is that no retention in situ of any significant remains will be possible. As such we would not support these conclusions, but seek a better understanding of the site through borehole evaluation prior to determination. The site does of course also contain high potential for ground contamination which could further compromise archaeological assessment’.

 

It is considered that semi-basement parking for the development is essential to provide the car parking for the development and which cannot be practicably provided above ground without a negative impact on the public realm and the development and neighbouring properties as a whole. A condition is recommended as per the recommendations set out in the archaeological assessment starting with the archaeological monitoring of any geotechnical boreholes and a Watching Brief to first establish the parameters before implementing mitigation measures as necessary.

 

Listed Buildings

The Development Brief sets out on the subject of the Historic Environment issues that ‘The Minister for Planning and Environment will apply a balanced approach, in accordance with his obligations under the law and internationally, in weighing up any negative impact of change on the integrity of the Listed buildings and archaeology against the need to secure the long-term future of heritage assets and the wider regenerative benefits of any proposed scheme’.

 

Policy HE1 of the Island Plan 2011 states that there will be a general presumption in favour of the preservation of the architectural and historic character and integrity of Listed Buildings and Places and states that permission will not be granted for ‘the total or partial demolition of a Listed Building’.

 

As part of the original planning application, 4 listed buildings at Fauxbie Villas were proposed to be demolished. The Applicant submitted with the planning application an Architectural and Historical Appraisal of Fauxbie Villas which detailed that the buildings were built in 1933/34 and that the listing of these buildings was questionable as they have little intrinsic architectural or historical significance.

 

The previous Listed Building Schedule for Fauxbie Villas stated (incorrectly as it turns out) that these buildings were constructed in the 1920’s. Following the Applicant’s submissions the listing of Fauxhie Villas was reviewed by Jersey Heritage who revised their recommendation as they considered that the heritage value of the buildings does not warrant their designation when considered against the Minister’s published criteria for listing and the buildings have subsequently been de-listed.

 

It is considered that the redevelopment of this site offers important benefits in the regeneration of the area by repairing the townscape, improving the vitality and viability of the town and removing a non-conforming hazardous use from the town whilst providing much needed housing and public realm and landscape improvements to the area.

 

14. Conclusion

The North Town Masterplan adopted June 2011 proposes that the Jersey Gas site is suitable for significant new residential development of approx. 300 homes should it become surplus to the Gas Company’s requirements and if it can extend its site at La Collette onto States Land.

 

The proposed development is broadly in accord with the North Town Masterplan with 297 residential units proposed and Jersey Gas proposed to relocate to La Collette. In addition there would be enclosed public open space, pedestrian links through the site, commercial or community units within the site and a range of building heights from 3 to 6 storeys.

 

A Development Brief for the  Jersey Gas Site was adopted and revised in September 2013 It is considered that the proposed development is in general accord with the Development Brief and meets the key principles and aims of the Brief.

 

The Development Brief makes reference to the biennial review of parking in St Helier that is undertaken to establish parking needs/demand. Following the last Biennial review in June 2013, the Development Brief was amended in September 2013 to reflect the Parking Review and amend the need to provide public parking on the application site and instead proposed replacing this with a negotiated commuted sum. TTS Highways have agreed a sum of £861,000 with the Applicant and it is considered that this commuted sum is acceptable and should be included in the Planning Obligation Agreement.

 

The density of the development is considered to be at the highest reasonable density, with concerns expressed regarding the impact on properties on Tunnell Street from the 5 storey residential block in the south-west part of the site. In the Departments consideration this is a finely balanced argument.

 

As part of the original planning application, 4 listed buildings at Fauxbie Villas were proposed to be demolished. The Applicant submitted with the planning application an Architectural and Historical Appraisal of Fauxbie Villas which detailed that the buildings were built in 1933/34 and that the listing of these buildings was questionable as they have little intrinsic architectural or historical significance.

 

The previous Listed Building Schedule for Fauxbie Villas stated (incorrectly as it turns out) that these buildings were constructed in the 1920’s. Following the Applicant’s submissions the listing of Fauxhie Villas was reviewed by Jersey Heritage who revised their recommendation as they considered that the heritage value of the buildings does not warrant their designation when considered against the Minister’s published criteria for listing and the buildings have subsequently been de-listed.

 

It is considered that the redevelopment of this area offers important benefits in the regeneration of the area by repairing the townscape, improving the vitality and viability of the town and removing a non-conforming hazardous use from the town whilst providing much needed housing and public realm and landscape improvements to the area.

 

 

 

 

 

15. Department Recommendation

Approval

 

It is recommended that the Minister endorse the APPROVAL of the application, subject to the applicant’s entering into a suitable planning obligation agreement, pursuant to Article 25 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law, 2002 (as amended), in respect of the following matters;

 

1. £861,000 to secure public car parking elsewhere in St Helier; and

 

2. the TTS Highways request to fund a bus shelter in the vicinity by way of a £7,500 financial contribution.

 

It is recommended that the Director (Development Control) be authorised to GRANT planning permission under powers delegated to him subject to conditions and reasons set out below and also subject to the completion of the planning obligation agreement referred to above.

 

Alternatively, in the event that a suitable planning obligation is not agreed within six months of his being authorised in accordance with this recommendation, the Director (Development Control) be authorised to REFUSE the grant of planning permission.

 

16. Conditions

 Condition 1.

A. If the development hereby permitted has not commenced within five years of the decision date, this permission shall cease to be valid.

 

Reason: The Minister for Planning and Environment reserves the right to reconsider this proposal consequent on any future change of circumstances or policy.

 

B. Application for the approval of Reserved Matters, as detailed in condition C, shall be made before the expiration of three years from the date of this decision.

 

Reason: To accord with Article 19(4) of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002. 

 

C. Approval of the details of the elevation design, landscaping, open space (including the interface between the Town Park and the application site), footpaths, public art, the vehicular accesses (including visibility) onto the Highway, servicing, loading bays and refuse servicing details - hereinafter called the Reserved Matters - shall be obtained by application to the Minister for Planning and Environment prior to any development commencing.

 

Reason: To accord with Article 19(4) of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002. 

 

2. The development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment, a Phasing Plan which shall include the timetable for the delivery of: each of the Blocks A to D; car parking, the public realm and landscape works. The development shall thereafter be implemented only in accordance with the approved Phasing Plan.

 

Reason: To ensure that the approved works to the public realm are not unnecessarily delayed that its importance is given sufficient priority in the phasing of the development, in accordance with Policy GD1 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

 

3. A Percentage for Art contribution must be delivered in accordance with the Percentage for Art Statement submitted to, and approved by, the Minister for Planning and Environment. The approved work of art must be installed prior to the first use/occupation of any part of the development hereby approved.

 

Reason: To accord with the provisions of Policy GD8 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

4. The development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment a Demolition / Construction Environmental Management Plan. The Plan shall include an implementation programme of mitigation measures to minimise any adverse effects of the proposal, and shall include:

i) A demonstration of best practice in relation to noise and vibration control; and control of dust and emissions;

ii) Details of a publicised complaints procedure, including office hours and out-of-hours contact numbers;

iii) Specified hours of working (to include that work resulting in noise being heard outside the application boundary occurs only between 8am and 6pm Monday to Friday, and 8am to 1pm on Saturdays, with no noisy working outside these times, and no noisy work on Bank or Public Holidays).

iv) Details of any proposed crushing / sorting of waste material on site;

v) Details of the proposed management of traffic and pedestrians (to include for vehicle wheel washing)

vi) Measures taken to detect and manage any asbestos.

 

The approved details shall thereafter be implemented in full prior to first occupation, and retained in perpetuity thereafter.

 

Reason: In the interests of protecting the amenities of the area generally and to accord with Policy GD1 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011.

The approved details shall thereafter be implemented in full prior, and retained until completion of the development.

 

5. Notwithstanding the submitted information, the development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment a scheme setting out the allocation of the car parking spaces and cycle storage spaces to individual apartments. For the avoidance of doubt, there shall be no car parking by commuters or non-residents other than persons visiting residents. Car parking shall not to be sub-let or reassigned to non-residents of the development. The approved details shall thereafter be implemented in full prior to first occupation, and retained in perpetuity thereafter.

 

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and to ensure adequate car parking in accordance with Policy GD1 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

6. Notwithstanding the submitted information, the development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment a Green Travel Plan covering the management of travel movements to and from the application site. The Methodology for the Green Travel Plan shall cover a period of at least 10-years and shall first have been agreed with the Minister for Planning and Environment, and shall include provision for management initiatives to manage demand for car trips and car parking. No accommodation shall be occupied until a Travel Plan coordinator has been appointed and their details forwarded to the Minister for Planning and Environment. The approved details shall thereafter be implemented in full prior to first occupation, and retained in perpetuity thereafter.

 

Reason: In the interests of promoting sustainable patterns of development, and to accord with Policies TT9, BE2 and SP6 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

7. The development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment, a scheme of service infrastructure, which shall include details of:

i) separated waste facilities and waste collection arrangements;

ii) details of the communal satellite television reception system (or other communications infrastructure);

iii) Confirmation of the location and number of electric car charging points; and

iv) proposed SUDS / rainwater harvesting, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment, to be thereafter implemented prior to first occupation and maintained in perpetuity.

 

The approved details shall thereafter be implemented in full prior to first occupation, and retained in perpetuity thereafter.

 

Reason: In the interests of providing adequate service infrastructure in accordance with Policy GD1 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011(Revised 2014)

 

8. The development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment, a scheme of external lighting. The approved details shall thereafter be implemented in full prior to first occupation, and retained in perpetuity thereafter.

 

Reason: In the interests of the amenities of the area and in accordance with the requirements of Policy GD1 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

9. The development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment an Ecological Report. The methodology for the Report shall first have been agreed in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment, and shall include survey for protected species to include amphibians and reptiles, mammals, bats and birds, to include consideration of habitat and potential mitigation works. The approved recommendations shall thereafter be implemented in full prior to commencement of development, and retained in perpetuity thereafter.

 

Reason: In the interests of biodiversity and ecology, in accordance with Policies SP4, NE1, NE2 and NE3 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

10. Notwithstanding the submitted information, the development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment a revised Waste Management Plan to include monitoring and reporting arrangements for the actual waste streams arising in relation to excavation and the demolition of existing structures. Prior to first occupation a Waste Management Completion Report shall be submitted to the Minister for Planning and Environment to demonstrate compliance with the approved revised Waste Management Plan.

 

Reason: In the interests of securing waste minimisation, and to accord with Policy WM1 and BE2 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

11. Notwithstanding the conclusions reached within the Phase 1 Desktop Study, should any contamination be found during the course of development hereby approved, work shall cease and the Department of the Environment contacted immediately. If contamination is identified, the levels of potential contaminants in the ground shall be investigated and any risks to human health or the wider environment assessed and mitigation measures proposed in a scheme, to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment. The approved scheme shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Minister and in accordance with the requirements of Supplementary Planning Guidance Planning Advice Note 2 - Development of Potentially Contaminated Land as amended.

 

Reason: To ensure the development does not have an unreasonable impact on public health or the wider environment and to accord with Policy GD6 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

13.   All planting and other operations comprised in the landscaping scheme approved under this permission, shall be carried out and completed in the first planting season following the first occupation of the development.

 

Reason: To ensure that the benefits of the approved landscaping scheme are not delayed and consequently make an early contribution to the amenity of the site in the interest of sustaining and enhancing landscape quality, in accordance with Policy NE 4 and GD1 of the Island Plan, 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

14.       Prior to the commencement of any development on site, an archaeological Project Design shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment. The Project Design shall comprise an archaeological watching brief for the duration of the works hereby approved, with provision to record significant remains, post evaluation reporting and removal of finds, if deemed appropriate. Once approved in writing, the Project Design shall be implemented at the applicant's expense. Should there be any unexpected significant finds during the excavation and other ground works, work shall cease on site and the Minister for Planning and Environment shall be notified immediately to allow for proper evaluation and removal of such finds.

 

Reason: To secure and safeguard the provision for inspection and recording of matters of archaeological importance associated with the application site.

 

15.      Notwithstanding the information on the submitted plans, prior to the commencement of the development of the above-basement superstructure for any of the Blocks, details of the proposed foul and surface water drainage shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment, in consultation with TTS Drainage, to be thereafter implemented in full prior to first occupation and maintained in perpetuity thereafter

 

Reason: In the interests of providing adequate drainage arrangements, in accordance with Policy GD1 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

16.       Prior to the commencement of development of the above basement superstructure a package of environmental enhancements shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment, to be thereafter implemented prior to first occupation and retained in perpetuity. The package shall include: the use of solar powered lighting for external areas; smart meters for water and electricity consumption visible within the kitchens of every residential unit; in-sink food waste disposal units to produce communally collected compostable food waste; rainwater harvesting for the irrigation and watering of landscaped areas; and, separated communal waste collection facilities, to include food compost, glass and cardboard.

 

Reason: In the interests of sustainable development, the reduction of waste and the delivery of adequate environmental infrastructure, in accordance with Policies SP2, GD1, NR2, NR7 and , WM1 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

17.   Prior to the commencement of development hereby permitted, a report setting out the arrangements for the management of the landscaped areas shall be submitted to and approved by the Minister for Planning and Environment, to include that any trees or plant(s) planted in accordance with the approved landscape scheme, which within a period of five years from the planting taking place; die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased, shall be replaced in the next planting season, unless the Minister for Planning and Environment gives written consent for a variation of the scheme.

 

Reason: To mitigate against the potential failure of trees and plants, and the extent to which that might threaten the success of the approved landscape scheme and in accordance with the requirements of Policies SP7 and GD7 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

18.      The development hereby permitted shall not be commenced until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment, a Method Statement to demonstrate how any risks to the aquatic environment during the construction of the culvert for the town brook on the application site will be minimised. The approved recommendations shall thereafter be implemented in full prior to commencement of development, and retained in perpetuity thereafter.

 

Reason: In the interests of biodiversity and ecology, in accordance with Policies SP4, NE1, NE2 and NE3 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

19.         Prior to occupation of any part of the development hereby approved, a completion report and contaminated land completion certificate demonstrating completion of the works and the effectiveness of any remediation set out in the approved scheme shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Minister for Planning and Environment. The completion report shall include a plan for longer term monitoring of pollutant linkages, maintenance and arrangements for contingency action and the reporting of this to the Minister for Planning and Environment.

 

Reason: To ensure the development does not have an unreasonable impact on public health or the wider environment and to accord with Policy GD6 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

 

17. Reason for

Approval

The proposed development is considered to be acceptable having due regard to the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (as revised in 2014) and all of the other material considerations raised. In particular, the development has been assessed against Policies SP1, SP2, SP3, SP4, SP6, SP7, GD1, GD3, GD4, GD5, GD6, GD7, GD8, NE1, HE1, HE5, H4, H6, E1, ER4, TT4, TT8, TT9, NR7, WM1 and LWM2 of the Jersey Island Plan 2011 (Revised 2014).

 

In addition, the development has been assessed against the North Town Masterplan as amended June 2011 and the Supplementary Planning Guidance Jersey Gas Site Development Brief (September 2013). In this case, the proposed development is regarded as acceptable having addressed the Aims of Development as set out in the Development Brief, and balanced the objectives of the various individual policies (particularly in relation to the amenities of neighbours, the protection of the historic environment and the delivery of housing units), within an economically viable development package necessary to secure the regeneration of this underutilised non-conforming hazardous use from the town.

 

It is considered that the proposed development offers important benefits in the regeneration of the area by repairing the townscape, improving the vitality and viability of the town and removing a non-conforming hazardous use from the town whilst providing much needed housing and public realm and landscape improvements to the area.

 

In addition, the representations raised to the scheme have been carefully assessed. The determination acknowledges the presented issues, particularly in relation to the highways and parking issues and regarding the amenities of neighbours by reference to the scale, form and nature of the proposals, and weighs them against the benefits delivered by the application. Taken as a package, it is considered that the application will be positive and beneficial, and that the potential impacts will not be unreasonable in all the circumstances.

 

 

18. Background

Papers   

1:2500 Location Plan

Consultation responses

Letters of objection

Responses from agent/ applicant

Jersey Architecture Commission notes

Original Department Report for Ministerial Meeting of 23 September 2014

Minutes of Ministerial Meeting 23 September 2014

 


 

Back to top
rating button