Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (Actions for Damages) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made (10.10.08) to approve the Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (Actions for Damages) (Jersey) Regulations 200- for lodging

Decision Reference:  MD-E-2008-0192  

Decision Summary Title :

Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (Actions for Damages) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Date of Decision Summary:

03 October 2008

Decision Summary Author:

 

James Mews

Finance Industry Development

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (Actions for Damages) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

Date of Written Report:

03 October 2008

Written Report Author:

James Mews

Finance Industry Development

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  

 

Approval of the draft Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (Actions for Damages) (Jersey) Regulations 200- for lodging.

 

Decision(s):

 

The Minister approved the draft Regulations and the attached report and for the documents to be lodged au Greffe for debate at the earliest possible opportunity. 

 

Reason(s) for Decision:

 

The current Regulations, made in 1988, that give effect to Article 35 of the Collective Investment Funds Law 1988 in relation to Recognized Funds refer to the Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (General provisions) (Jersey) Order 1988, which has been superseded and replaced by the Collective Investment (Recognized Funds) (Rules) (Jersey) Order 2003.  The Regulations therefore require updating.

 

 

 

Resource Implications:

 

There are no measurable financial or manpower costs for the States.

 

Action required:

 

To approve the draft Regulations and the attached report and for the documents to be lodged au Greffe for debate at the earliest possible opportunity. 

 

Signature:  Senator P.F.C.Ozouf

 

 

Position:

Minister for Economic Development

 

Date Signed:

 

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (Actions for Damages) (Jersey) Regulations 200-

 

DRAFT COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS (RECOGNIZED FUNDS) (ACTIONS FOR DAMAGES) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 200-

(“THE REGULATIONS”)

 

1          THE ISSUE AND RECOMMENDATION

 

1.1             It is recommended that the Minister for Economic Development (“the Minister”) should approve the draft Regulations and the attached report, sign the Decision Summary and that the documents should be lodged au Greffe for debate at the earliest possible opportunity.

 

2                    SUMMARY

 

2.1             The Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (Actions for Damages) (Jersey) Regulations 1988 (“the 1988 Regulations) give effect to Article 35 of the Collective Investment Funds Law 1988 (“the Law”) in relation to Recognized Funds.  The 1988 Regulations are now out of date because they refer to the Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 1988 (“The 1988 Order”), which was superseded and replaced in 2003.

2.2             The Regulations form part of the subordinate legislation that relates to Recognized Funds class and which collectively is the basis for Jersey's Designated Territory status under Section 270 of the FSMA.  Failure to keep the Regulations up to date could therefore threaten Jersey’s Designated Territory status.

3                    BACKGROUND

 

3.1             Article 35 of the “Law, provides that, to the extent specified by the States in Regulations, a failure to comply with any statutory requirement under that law shall be actionable at the suit of a person who suffers loss as a result of that failure, subject to the defences and other incidents applying to actions for breach of statutory duty. 

 

3.2             The 1988 Regulations had the effect of making Article 35 applicable to any failure by certain operators of funds of the Recognized Funds class to comply with the Law or either of two Orders made under it that related to funds of that class.

 

3.3             The 1988 Order was recently superseded and replaced by the Collective Investment Funds (Recognized Funds) (Rules) (Jersey) Order 2003. It is therefore necessary to update the Regulations to ensure that the applicability of Article 35 continues to be relevant. 

 

3.4             Owing to differences between the terminology employed in the new Order and that of the original Order, it was simpler to re-draft the Regulations in their entirety, rather than amend them.

3.5             The Regulations form part of a suite of legislation made under the Law that together defines the Recognized Funds class of collective investment funds and sets the regulatory requirements applicable to funds of that class. One of the objectives of the legislation is to ensure that the investor protection arrangements are equivalent to those available to participants in authorised collective investment funds in the UK. 

 

3.6             On the basis of such equivalence having been demonstrated, the Secretary of State for the Treasury made an Order designating Jersey for the purposes of Section 270 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.  As a result of this Designated Territory status, Recognized Funds in Jersey are permitted to market directly to members of the public in the UK.  As at 30 June 2008, there were 9 Recognized Funds in Jersey that were permitted to market directly into the UK.  They had an aggregate sterling equivalent value of approximately £2.5 billion.

 

3.7             It is important to ensure the continued applicability of Article 35 of the Law to Recognized Funds in order to maintain Jersey’s Designated Territory status. 

 

  1. RECOMMENDATION

 

4.1 It is recommended that the Minister for Economic Development should approve the draft Regulations and the attached report, sign the Decision Summary and that the documents should be lodged au Greffe for debate at the earliest possible opportunity.

 

 

 

 

JAMES MEWS

Finance Industry Development Executive

3 October 2008

 

Back to top
rating button