Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Agreement between United Kingdom and Jersey on International Tax Compliance: Ratification

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 1 May 2014:

Decision Reference: MD-C-2014-0090

Decision Summary Title :

Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of Jersey to Improve International Tax Compliance

Date of Decision Summary:

30 April 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

External Relations

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of Jersey to Improve International Tax Compliance

Date of Written Report:

30 April 2014

Written Report Author:

Adviser – International Affairs  

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:  Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of Jersey to Improve International Tax Compliance

Decision(s):  The Chief Minister decided to lodge ‘au Greffe’ a Report and Proposition entitled ‘Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of Jersey to Improve International Tax Compliance for States debate at the earliest opportunity.’  

Reason(s) for Decision: An Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of Jersey to improve international tax compliance was signed in London by the Chief Minister on the 22nd October 2013. This Agreement is commonly referred to as an intergovernmental agreement or IGA. Also signed by the Chief Minister was an amendment to the 2009 Agreement between the United Kingdom and Jersey for the exchange of information relating to tax matters.

 

This Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) is based on the requirements of the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) enacted in 2010 whereby foreign financial institutions are required to report financial account information in respect of specified persons. The purpose of these requirements is to reduce tax evasion, which the Jersey authorities are committed to support through their active engagement in a number of current international initiatives

Resource Implications: The resource implications are detailed in the main Report.

 

It is difficult at this stage to quantify the financial or manpower implications.  However, given the commitments entered into with the G20 and the international community generally, and the specific commitments to join in the fight against tax evasion to which the IGA relates, it is considered that the financial and manpower costs to be incurred are unavoidable.

Action required: The Greffier of the States to be asked to arrange to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the Report and Proposition for debate at the same time as the Taxation (Implementation) (International Tax Compliance) (United Kingdom) (Jersey) Regulations 201- (MD-C-2014-0091).

Signature:

 

Position: 

 

Chief Minister of Jersey  

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Back to top
rating button