Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Income Support (Special Payments) (Child Personal Care) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 28 July 2014:

Decision Reference:  MD-S-2014-0094

Decision Summary Title :

DS - Income Support (Special Payments)(Child Personal Care)(Jersey) Regulations 201-

Date of Decision Summary:

25 July 2014

Decision Summary Author:

 

Policy Principal

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

 

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

WR - Income Support (Special Payments)(Child Personal Care)(Jersey) Regulations 201-

Date of Written Report:

25 July 2014

Written Report Author:

Policy Principal

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

 

N/A

Subject:  Income Support (Special Payments)(Child Personal Care)(Jersey) Regulations 201-

Decision(s):  The Minister decided to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the draft Income Support (Special Payments)(Child Personal Care) Regulations 201-

Reason(s) for Decision: 

 

The proposed Income Support (Special Payments)(Child Personal Care)(Jersey) Regulations 2014 create a mechanism whereby the parents of children that meet the requirements for the highest levels of the impairment award (Personal Care levels 2 and 3) can always receive a payment in respect of the child, independent of parental income.   The Regulations are supported by amendments to the Income Support (Jersey) Regulations 2007 and a related Order that makes changes to the Income Support (General Provisions) Order 2008. 

 

The Income Support (Special Payments)(Cold Weather Payments)(Jersey) Regulations 2008 are also subject to a separate amendment that allows an Income Support household with a child qualifying for PC3 to continue to qualify for the cold weather payments made under Income Support legislation.

Resource Implications:  The Department has £22,000  (full year cost) of funding available to meet the additional cost of providing PC3 on a consistent basis to all children that qualify for this highest level of support.  This funding has been identified as part of the overall project to create £3 million savings within the income support budget in 2014.

 

The Department will submit a growth bid to MTFP2  in respect of funding for a PC2 benefit and associated administration from 2016 onwards.  The estimated cost of this is £470,000 per annum.

Funding for 2015 lies outside the current MTFP budget and will need to be identified from departmental underspends or from the use of a contingency budget.  In addition to the ongoing annual cost of £470,000  for 2015 an estimated £100,000 of additional implementation costs will need to be met, a total of £570,000.

One additional FTE will be required to maintain these claims.

 

Action required:  Policy Principal to request the Greffier of the States to lodge ‘au Greffe’ the draft legislation and to request a States debate on the sitting commencing 9th September 2014

Signature:

 

Position:

 

Date Signed:

 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed):

 

Income Support (Special Payments) (Child Personal Care) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

 

Income Support (Special Payments) (Child Personal Care) (Jersey) Regulations 201-

1.    Introduction of Child Disability Allowances
 

During the States debate on Deputy Martin’s amendment  to the income support regulations (P.90/2014) in respect of components payable to children with disabilities and long-term health conditions, the States strongly supported a move to make payments to children with severe or very severe disabilities irrespective of the income or means of the family.

The debate also supported the concept of a disability strategy and the need for coordination between States departments in this area. However, Members confirmed that they wished to see  financial support  extended to all families bringing up a child with a significant level of disability, regardless of household income,  in advance of the disability strategy being completed. 

As identified by the Minister for Social Security  both prior to and during the debate, acceptance of the amendment carried with it significant  implications in terms of both funding and administration and the Minister deferred the remainder of the debate on P.90  to allow these implications to be properly considered.

Following the debate, two detailed and positive meetings have been held with Deputy Martin and relevant ministers.  The outcome of those two meetings was summarised  in an oral answer given by the Minister for Social Security on 14 July.

In summary,

  • the formal provision of the highest level of personal care component (PC3) to any family that includes a child with a very severe disability, regardless of income, will proceed  in September
  • The new provision of the second level of personal care component (PC2) to any family that includes a child with a severe disability, regardless of income, will be available from January 2015.
  • Additional research will be undertaken to identify the most appropriate means of supporting families that include a child with a lower level of disability (PC1).

This timetable is subject to States approval of the revised regulations now proposed .

Low income families  receiving income support will continue to receive these components (PC1, PC2, PC3)  in respect of children with disabilities whilst these changes are taking place.

2.    Proposal – Income support regulations and new legislation

The main purpose of the income support system is to provide household benefits which depend on the level of income and assets of the household.   The support proposed for children with a severe or very severe level of disability will take  no  account of household income, but it is possible  to use the special payment mechanism included within the income support law to make these payments.    Given the desire of the States to address this issue without delay, the regulations  previously drawn up in respect of personal care level 3  have now been extended to personal care level 2  as explained below.  The report accompanying P 90 set out details of the mechanism of the new regulations which remain broadly unchanged.

The regulations now proposed take children with personal care levels 2 and 3 outside of the means test for income support.  If approved, the regulations will take effect seven days after the debate in respect of PC3, and from 1 January 2015 for PC2.  The staggered dates are necessary to give the Social Security Department time to prepare for the assessment and administration of the additional claims.

These special payment regulations provide an interim solution.   A new  child disability allowance law would specifically establish a benefit to be paid to the parent of a child with a given level of disability.  The new law should be developed as part of the ongoing development of a disability strategy   and should  provide for future flexibility in terms of introducing  different assessment tests and providing benefits through different payment mechanisms.

3.    Impact of proposals:  PC3
 

The transfer of personal care level 3 was included in  the regulations originally lodged  by the Minister.  These families are already receiving  assistance outside the main means tested system, the children have already received assessments and budget is  already available.  The regulations  will have  effect seven days after the date of the debate. 

The transfer to the regulations  will simplify the application process and provide a formal right to appeal a decision.  Existing families  with a child assessed at PC3 will be automatically transferred to the new regulations  - they will not need to re-apply.   There is some limited internal administration required to ensure all claims are paid using the same mechanism.  This is a one off task which, on its own,  would  be accommodated within existing resources.

4.    Financial and manpower implications – PC3
 

The cost of implementation of the original proposals to extend PC3 to the parents of all children with very severe disabilities is estimated at £22,000 per annum  in respect of a small number of claims which are currently paid at less than the full PC3 rate.   This sum has been provided for  within the overall project to create savings of £3 million from the income support budget in 2014. There is no requirement for additional manpower.

5.    Impact of proposals:  PC2
 

The ability of parents with incomes above the income support level  to claim a cash benefit in respect of a child with a severe disability was the focus of the States debate.  These children have a level of disability which qualifies them for PC2, but is below the level  to qualify for PC3.

Extending this support to  higher income families will create a substantial additional demand.  Analysis undertaken since the first debate suggests that there might be up to  80 additional children eligible  for this level of benefit, compared with 20 existing claims.

In addition to the number of children who will qualify for PC2, the Department is also likely to receive  many queries from parents  in respect of other children whose needs fall below this level, but who will need to be advised and may need assessments  to determine their exact score.   Additional assessors  will need to be recruited on a temporary basis to deal with this volume of assessment work. 

It is proposed that the new benefit  will be available from 1 January 2015.  However, it is unlikely that applications can start to  be assessed before the beginning of next year.   As each child is assessed, a backdated payment will be made, to ensure that families are treated fairly and are all able to receive  payments  from the same date.

Children  already receiving PC2 through income support  will see no difference to their weekly benefit and will be transferred to the new system on 1 January 2015.  These children have already received an assessment and the budget for their payments already exists.  These children live in low income families who would be more vulnerable to any disruption in benefit payment. During 2015, any new family that is likely to require income support will be prioritised within the assessment process for PC2, to avoid any delay in providing a payment. 

6.    Financial and manpower considerations – PC2
 

The benefit cost of extending PC2 to an additional 80 children would be £420,000  in 2015   (£5,260 pa  x 80 children = £420,800).  In addition to the cost of the benefit itself, there is a substantial cost to be met in the initial assessment of these children, which will need to take place as quickly as possible at the beginning of 2015.  It is likely that the Department will need to use specialist healthcare professionals brought in from the UK for this process. The increased number of ongoing claims  will also require additional permanent staff to administer new claims, and review children at each developmental milestone.  Additional work will be undertaken to clarify the cost of this assistance, which is currently estimated at £100,000  to deal with set up costs for the new benefit and to undertake the initial assessments  and £50,000 per annum for the ongoing administration  of claims.

The total cost to be met in 2014/2015 is therefore estimated at £570,000. This cost is not provided for in the current Medium Term Financial Plan.  The Social Security Department will seek to provide funding in 2015 through the allocation of underspends. In the event that this is not sufficient, the Minister for Treasury and Resources has confirmed that approval will be sought to use contingency budgets to meet this cost.

A growth bid will be made in respect of MTFP2, to provide funding of approximately £470,000 pa  from 2016 onwards.  This bid has not previously been included in the preliminary planning of MTFP2, and savings will need to be made in other areas of government spending to accommodate this additional cost.

These are preliminary costings and may be subject to change.

One additional FTE will be required to maintain these claims.

7.    Personal care level 1
 

Prior to income support, a child with a significant disability could be supported through attendance allowance (children with very severe disabilities) or child disability allowance (children with severe disabilities).  In broad  terms, these benefits have been replaced by personal care level 3 and personal care level 2.

There was no previous equivalent to personal care level 1.  This component was introduced as part of the income support system to provide a small additional weekly sum to an adult or to a low income parent bringing up a child, with a low level of disability or other medical condition.

Constructive discussions with Deputy Martin have  identified the disproportionate administrative cost of undertaking full assessments in respect of a large number of children, with a wide range of less severe medical conditions, who might qualify for PC1.   In light of these high administration costs, Deputy Martin has agreed to support the current proposed regulations which do not make any changes to the eligibility for personal care level 1, on the understanding that the Social Security Department will investigate if there are more appropriate ways to provide targeted support to children who have low levels of disability, in non-income support households, as part of the wider discussions on a disability strategy for Jersey.

 

8.    Other regulations
 

As with the Minister’s previous proposals (P. 90) these regulations, which set up a new form of special payment to make the payments in respect of children with severe or very severe disabilities, are supported by two additional sets of regulations which make minor amendments to existing income support regulations.  In addition, a ministerial order will make consequential changes to the Income Support (General Provisions) Order.

9.    Financial and manpower considerations – summary
 

The Department has £22,000  (full year cost) of funding available to meet the additional cost of providing PC3 on a consistent basis to all children that qualify for this highest level of support.  This funding has been identified as part of the overall project to create £3 million savings within the income support budget in 2014.

The Department will submit a growth bid to MTFP2  in respect of funding for a PC2 benefit and associated administration from 2016 onwards.  The estimated cost of this is £470,000 per annum.

Funding for 2015 lies outside the current MTFP budget and will need to be identified from departmental underspends or from the use of a contingency budget.  In addition to the ongoing annual cost of £470,000  for 2015 an estimated £100,000 of implementation and one-off costs will need to be met, a total of £570,000 required in 2014/2015.

One additional FTE will be required to maintain these claims.

 

 

Back to top
rating button