Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200- Amd (2) and Amd (3): Comments

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made on 9 November 2009 to approve the comments on Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) (Jersey) Law 200- Amd (2) and Amd (3) (P111/2009)

Decision Reference:    MD-E-2009-0194

Decision Summary Title :

Comments on P.111/2009 ‘Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200-‘ Amd (2) and Amd (3)

Date of Decision Summary:

30th October 2009

Decision Summary Author:

Strategy Manager, Economic Development

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

N/A

Written Report

Title :

Comments on P.111/2009 ‘Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200-‘ Amd (2) and Amd (3)

Date of Written Report:

29th October 2009

Written Report Author:

Strategy Manager, Economic Development

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

(State clauses from Code of Practice booklet)

Public

Subject:

Comments on P.111/2009 ‘Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200-‘ Amd (2) and Amd (3)

Decision(s):

The Minister approves the report to be presented as comments on the specified amendments to P.111/2009 at the earliest opportunity. 

Reason(s) for Decision:

To respond to the proposed amendments to the Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200-, with which the Minister is not in full agreement. 

Resource Implications:

None 

Action required:

The Minister approved the comments on the specified amendments to P.111/2009 and requested the Greffier to arrange for these comments to be presented to the States as soon as possible. 

Signature:  Senator A.J.H.Maclean

Position:  Minister  

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200- Amd (2) and Amd (3): Comments

Date of Report:  29th October 2009  

Report for the Economic Development Minister  

Comments on amendments to Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200-

P.111/2009 Amd (2) and P.111/2009 Amd (3) 
 
 

Purpose of the Report  

To request that the Economic Development Minister approve the following comments on amendments to the Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200-, and that he direct officers to pass these to the States Greffe for presentation to the States Assembly as soon as possible- 
 

P.111/2009 Amd (2) - Deputy Gorst  

Part (a)  

If Part (a) of this amendment is adopted, Christmas Day will remain a ‘Sunday’ under the law, but there will be no power for Connétables to grant permits for shops to trade. Virtually all shops will be closed - even those with Sunday trading permits. Pubs, restaurants and cafes will be permitted to open if they wish - as these are regulated by other laws, as would shops exempt under the law. 

There tends to be very limited opening on Christmas Day, most of it catering to shoppers obtaining household essentials in the morning. Some small convenience stores historically trade on Christmas Day, usually for a few hours in the morning. These are primarily family-run shops and some of the Spar chain. These will be forced to close. 

Economic Development does not feel that it would be appropriate to limit the operation of small local shops on this day, as there is little demand and it is anecdotally understood that the shops that do open would be unable to do so without the agreement of the staff (often family members). These shops would not open without some demand from the public, who are often looking for essential or overlooked Christmas necessities.  

In any event regulations can be made under the law to restrict the size or type of shop which might be allowed to open on Christmas Day. 

Accordingly, Economic Development considers that this Part of the amendment should be rejected.  

Part (b)  

If Part (b) of this amendment is adopted Good Friday and Liberation Day could not be designated by the Economic Development Minister as special occasions under the law, so there would be no opportunity for Connétables to grant a blanket permit to allow shops without Sunday trading permits to trade on those days. 

Economic Development has no fundamental objection to this Part of the amendment, as such a situation is highly unlikely to occur. 

 

P.111/2009 Amd (3) - Deputy Green  

Part (a)  

If Part (a) of this amendment is adopted, 26th December will become a ‘Sunday’ under the Law, increasing the ‘additional’ Sundays (Good Friday, Liberation Day and Christmas Day being the others) under the law from three to four. Sunday trading permits will still apply - so many shops will still be open. This additional restriction will affect retailers who wish to begin their post-Christmas sales on 26th December, as well as consumers who wish to ‘stock up’ after Christmas. 

Deputy Green makes two points in the report accompanying his amendment - firstly that there needs to be additional protection on this day to uphold family life and secondly about the negative effects of the substitution of the Boxing Day holiday to 28th December as a result of the Chief Minister ’s Department’s proposition P.151/2009 (which is not connected to the Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200-). 

The Deputy also refers to a lack of consultation about trading on 26th December (albeit in connection with the aforementioned P.151/2009). From 2006-2007 Economic Development conducted exhaustive consultation on the general principles of a Sunday trading law, and received responses from all interested parties. A survey was conducted by the Statistics Unit on behalf of the Department, an analysis of the responses of those most potentially affected by proximity to large stores was conducted, and a questionnaire was returned by interested parties.  

Churches (Evangelical, Baptist, Methodist and Church of England) replied to the questionnaire, as did all types of business, the Parishes, tourist attractions, and individuals. Members may note that 16 pages of public response data have been included as an appendix to the report accompanying the proposition. While it would have been impossible to fully satisfy the requirements of all respondents, Economic Development has taken the views of the majority on board when developing the Law, and will do so when finalising the subordinate legislation. 

It does not appear that any of these respondents recommended the introduction of Sunday trading on 26th December. This raises the concern that all of the aforementioned consultation has been carried out in respect of a law that was generally as restrictive as the 1960 law in terms of trading days. Stakeholders have at no point received an indication that there might be an intention to impose additional restrictions in this manner. 

In respect of staff being compelled to work on 26th December, statements from retailers indicate that there is generally a waiting list for staff wishing to work on Sundays and bank holidays.  

This argument might not be applicable in relation to 26th December 2009, as this is no longer a bank holiday, however, it is not appropriate to permanently change the finalised and widely-publicised form of the Shops (Regulation of Opening and Deliveries) Law 200- in order to resolve a perceived issue resulting from another proposition which will occur on one day (on average) every seven years.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Accordingly, Economic Development considers that this Part of the amendment should be rejected.  

Part (b)  

If Part (b) of this amendment is adopted 26th December could not be designated by the Economic Development Minister as special occasions under the law, so there would be no opportunity for Connétables to grant a blanket permit to allow shops without Sunday trading permits to trade on that day.  

Economic Development has no fundamental objection to this Part of the amendment, as such a situation is highly unlikely to occur.  

Recommendation  

That the Minister approves the Comments and directs officers as above. 

Report prepared by Strategy Manager, Economic Development

 

Back to top
rating button