The Department recommended approval for the original scheme in the knowledge that the existing access met with the technical guidance of the Transport and Technical Services (as detailed below). The Panel, having viewed that access on-site, were concerned that the traffic generated by the three additional houses may lead to queuing on the private Broadlands Estate road. This, it was considered, would inconvenience the residents (two parking areas are adjacent) to a degree that it would be harmful to the amenity of the area and also raise highway safety concerns. The Panel agreed to two dwellings using the existing access but stipulated that the access would need to be widened if a third dwelling was to be constructed. This was agreed by the applicant. The residents of Broadlands estate maintained strong objection to the entire development but also specifically to the width of the access. This objection has continued on the grounds of highway safety and the built-up nature of La Rue du Hocq. However, it is not considered that the traffic generated by three dwellings would increase traffic levels to such a degree as to harm the amenity of the existing residents or would result in an unreasonable degradation of highway safety. This conclusion is reached on the basis of the provision of the passing area and because the area of road that would be used by the three new dwellings is already passed by the traffic of 17 units. Therefore, the proportional increase in traffic is only limited. Whether the access is 3.66m wide or 4.8m wide, it is not considered that the houses opposite would suffer such inconvenience, or concerns regarding safety, to prevent approval. Technical Guidance “Roads Serving Small Housing Development” The agent is correct to state that the Broadlands Estate road is essentially a Class C road, two way and capable of serving 25 dwellings. In this regard it is reasonable to argue that it is capable of sustaining the additional 3 dwellings (making a total of 24 using the road). Whilst parking by the existing residents does occur on the private road, the site is served by adequate car parking and it would not be reasonable to deny the access of 3.66m in width on the basis of this parking. The agent is correct to state that a minimum width of only 3m is required (Road type A) to serve a development of 4 or less dwellings given that the access road is less than 50m long. Furthermore, the scheme includes a passing place immediately inside the entrance which is not required to serve a development of this size. It should be noted that the private ownership and the costs of maintenance of the Broadlands Estate Road was not a material consideration of the determination of the application. In conclusion, it is considered unreasonable to maintain Condition 3 on the basis of the guidance of Transport and Technical Services and on the limited increase in the traffic on the effected part of the Broadlands estate road. |