Skip to main content Skip to accessibility
This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser. If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099.
Government of Jerseygov.je

Information and public services for the Island of Jersey

L'înformâtion et les sèrvices publyis pouor I'Île dé Jèrri

P.39/2010 Reciprocal Health Agreement with the UK - negotiations - comment by the Minister for Health and Social Services

A formal published “Ministerial Decision” is required as a record of the decision of a Minister (or an Assistant Minister where they have delegated authority) as they exercise their responsibilities and powers.

Ministers are elected by the States Assembly and have legal responsibilities and powers as “corporation sole” under the States of Jersey Law 2005 by virtue of their office and in their areas of responsibility, including entering into agreements, and under any legislation conferring on them powers.

An accurate record of “Ministerial Decisions” is vital to effective governance, including:

  • demonstrating that good governance, and clear lines of accountability and authority, are in place around decisions-making – including the reasons and basis on which a decision is made, and the action required to implement a decision

  • providing a record of decisions and actions that will be available for examination by States Members, and Panels and Committees of the States Assembly; the public, organisations, and the media; and as a historical record and point of reference for the conduct of public affairs

Ministers are individually accountable to the States Assembly, including for the actions of the departments and agencies which discharge their responsibilities.

The Freedom of Information Law (Jersey) Law 2011 is used as a guide when determining what information is be published. While there is a presumption toward publication to support of transparency and accountability, detailed information may not be published if, for example, it would constitute a breach of data protection, or disclosure would prejudice commercial interest.

A decision made 7 May 2010 regarding: P.39/2010 Reciprocal Health Agreement with the UK - negotiations - comment by the Minister for Health and Social Services.

Decision Reference:        MD-HSS-2010-0030

Decision Summary Title :

P39/2010 Reciprocal Health Agreement with the UK: Negotiations

Date of Decision Summary:

7 May 2010

Decision Summary Author:

Assistant Director Corporate Planning, Performance Management

Decision Summary:

Public or Exempt?

Public

Type of Report:

Oral or Written?

Written

Person Giving

Oral Report:

 

Written Report

Title :

P39/2010 Reciprocal Health Agreement with the UK: Negotiations- Comment

Date of Written Report:

6 May 2010

Written Report Author:

Acting Deputy Chief Officer

Written Report :

Public or Exempt?

Public

Subject: P39/2010 Reciprocal Health Agreement with the UK: Negotiations - Comment by the Minister for Health and Social Services

Decision(s):  The Minister approved the comment

Reason(s) for decision: The Minister wishes to accept the proposition

Resource Implications: None in relation to the comment

Action required: Request the Greffier of the States to arrange for the comment to be presented to the States

Signature: 

Position:

Minister for Health and Social Services

Date Signed: 

Date of Decision (If different from Date Signed): 

P.39/2010 Reciprocal Health Agreement with the UK - negotiations - comment by the Minister for Health and Social Services

P39/2010- A Reciprocal Health Agreement with the United Kingdom: Negotiations  

I am delighted to support this proposition as it will ensure that a collective resource is brought to future negotiations with Her Majesty’s Government in relation to the Reciprocal Health Agreement with Jersey. 

The discontinuation of the long-standing agreement has been a particular concern of mine from the outset of my time as Minister of Health as Social Services. I recognise the considerable anxiety and confusion that changes introduced unilaterally by the UK Government have caused, particularly for the elderly or for those with pre-existing conditions who have often found it hard to obtain health insurance when wishing to visit friends and relatives on the mainland. 

These points were discussed at a recent meeting with the Right Honourable Alain Beith, MP, in his role as Chair of the Justice Committee within the House of Commons. This was in relation to that committee’s review of the handling by the UK of constitutional arrangements with the Crown Dependencies.  The final report of the Committee concluded that: “the lack of consultation and discussion of possible options, with each Crown Dependency was a failing in the UK Government’s approach to its responsibilities in deciding the future of the Reciprocal Health Agreements” 

In seeking to negotiate a new agreement a number of steps have been taken. My Acting Chief Officer, together with the Director of International Affairs, now have a meeting scheduled in early June with representatives of the UK Department of Health as part of a new, more collaborative approach already being undertaken in seeking to negotiate revised arrangements.  The extension of the Isle of Man agreement until September on the basis of reciprocal care but without an exchange of money between the UK and the Isle of Man is providing a useful model for the future, and the Director International Affairs is liaising closely with both the Isle of Man and the UK Department of Health as they work to conclude the terms of this extended arrangement. 

As I have said previously, I am committed to ensuring maximum benefit and value for money for the people of Jersey seeking access to appropriate treatment in the UK and welcome this proposition as an opportunity to fulfil that commitment. 

Deputy Anne Pryke, Minister for Health and Social Services

6 May 2010

 

Back to top
rating button